Uticaj veštačke inteligencije na obavljanje profesija u pravosuđu
Sažetak
Veštačka inteligencija (VI) transformiše razne sektore, pa ni pravosudni sistem nije izuzetak. Autorka ovog rada istražuje uticaj VI na obavljanje profesija u pravosuđu. Integracija VI u pravosudne sisteme pruža značajnu korist u smislu efikasnosti, dostupnosti pravde i tačnosti u donošenju odluka. Međutim, ona takođe predstavlja izazove kojima se moramo pozabaviti putem pažljivog sprovođenja VI, etičkih razmatranja i stalnog prilagođavanja. Iako je upotreba VI u pravosuđu u porastu i razlikuje se u zavisnosti od zemlje, ona donosi potencijalne rizike u vezi sa osnovnim pravima. U ovom tekstu autorka procenjuje da li upotreba VI od strane stručnjaka u pravosuđu ugrožava pravo na pravično suđenje, uključujući i pravo na nezavisne i nepristrasne sudove, ravnopravnost strana u postupku itd. Autorka takođe procenjuje da li neke od uvedenih alatki, naročito one koje predviđaju sudske odluke i povratništvo, krše osnovna prava. Na kraju, autorka procenjuje opcije daljeg razvoja i upotrebe VI u pravosudnim profesijama.
Reference
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L. (2022). Machine Bias. In: Martin, K. (ed.). Ethics of Data and Analytics, Auerbach Publications, 264–275.
Avramović, D. (2018). Analysis of the Predictability of Judges’ Acting – Return to Mechanical Jurisprudence, CRIMEN, 9 (2), 155–167. [In Serbian]
Avramović, D., Jovanov, I. (2023). Judicial (im)partiality and artificial intelligence, Strani pravni život, 67 (2), 166–177. [In Serbian]
Bennett Moses, L., Chan, J. (2018). Algorithmic Prediction in Policing Assumptions, Evaluation, and Accountability, Policing and Society, 28 (7), 806–822.
Bouchagiar, G. (2024). Is Europe prepared for Risk Assessment Technologies in criminal justice? Lessons from the US experience, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 15 (1), 72–98.
Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., Ehret, B. (2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS Risk and Needs Assessment System, Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36 (1), 2009, 21–40.
Contini, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings, Law, Technology and Humans, 2(1), 4–18.
Contini, F., Lanzara, G. F. (2018). The elusive mediation between law and technology – Undetectable Errors in ICT-Based Judicial Proceedings. In: Branco, P., Hosen, N., Leone, M., Mohr, R. (eds.). Tools of Meaning: Representation, Objects, and Agency in the Technologies of Law and Religion, 39–66.
Cvetković, V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Development and the Future of Society. Sociološki pregled, vol. LVII, no. 1, pp. 23–31.
Đorđević, M. (2022). Between the Judiciary and Advocacy: Professional Preferences of Law Students in Serbia. Sociološki pregled, 56 (2), 680–780.
Forrest, K. (2021). When Machines Can be Judge, Jury and Executioner: Justice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, World Scientific Publishing Company.
Grace, J. (2021). ‘Algorithmic impropriety’ in UK policing contexts: a developing narrative?, In: McDaniel, J. L. M., Pease, K. G. (eds.). Predictive Policing and Artificial Intelligence, Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice, Routledge, 237–253.
Kissinger, H. A., Schmidt, E., Huttenlocher, D. (2021). The Age of AI – And Our Human Future, John Murray, 2021.
Matić Bošković, M., Nenadić, S. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Criminal Justice Systems Across Europe, EU and Comparative Law issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), vol. 5, 263–290. EU 2021 – The Future of the EU in and After the Pandemic, Faculty of Law. Osijek: University of Osijek.
Matić Bošković, M. (2022). EU Criminal Procedural Law. Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja. [In Serbian]
Matić Bošković, M. (2020a). Role of Court of Justice of the European Union in Establishment of EU Standards on Independence of Judiciary, EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC), 4, 329–335.
Matić Bošković, M. (2020b). Human Dignity in the Criminal Proceedings – Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights, Yearbook – Human Rights Protection – Right to Dignity, Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
Naziris, Y. (2022). Algorithmizing Criminal Law: What is Left to Human Judgement. In: Kostić, J., Matić Bošković, M. (eds.). Digitalization in Penal Law and Judiciary, Institute of Comparative Law. Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, 365–384.
Nenadić, S., Miljuš, I. (2022). Criminal Justice in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. In: Kostić, J., Matić Bošković, M. (eds.). Digitalization in Penal Law and Judiciary. Institute of Comparative Law, Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, 291–315.
Reiling, D. (2010). Technology for Justice: How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform, Leiden University Press.
Siau, K., Wang, W. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and Ethical AI, Journal of Database Management, 31 (2), 74–87.
Smith, R. (2021). The Future of Law: Technology, Innovation and Access to Justice in Legal Services Around the World. In: De Suza, S. P., Spohr, M. (eds.). Technology, Innovation and Access to Justice, Edinburgh University Press, 69–87.
Terzidou, K. (2022). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary and its Compliance with the Right to a Fair Trial, Journal of Judicial Administration, 31 (3), 154–168, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4495715
Terzidou, K. (2023). The Evolution of the Perception of Artificial Intelligence in the EU: the Case of Judicial Administration, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC), 14 (3), 2023, 365–374.
Toskic Cvetinovic, A., Tosic, M. (2022). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Judiciary – Perspectives and Challenges. In: J. Kostić, M. Matić Bošković (eds.). Digitalization in Penal Law and Judiciary, Institute of Comparative Law, Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research,. 317–341.
Ulenaers, J. (2020). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Right to a Fair Trial: Towards a Robot Judge, Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 11 (2), DOI:10.1515/ajle-2020-0008.
Vuković, I., Čisar, P., Kuk, K., Popović, B. (2021). Challenges of Contemporary Predictive Policing, vol. 11, Thematic Conference Proceedings of International Significance – Archibald Reiss Days, University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, 513–526.
Završnik, A. (2020). Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights, ERA Forum, 20, 567–583.
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2024 Sociološki pregled
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.