Izražavanje nezadovoljstva zbog međunarodnih normi: predstavljanje kineske međunarodne diskurzivne strategije za suprotstavljanje SAD u Južnom kineskom moru
Sažetak
U radu se ova pitanja istražuju iz perspektive zvaničnog kineskog diskursa u vezi sa sporom u Južnom kineskom moru. Polazeći od ključne pretpostavke da za razumevanje načina na koji kineski zvaničnici posmatraju međunarodni poredak nije važno ono što oni kažu već kako to kažu, ovaj rad primenjuje kombinovani metodološki pristup u kritičkoj analizi diskursa da bi se objasnila implicitna značenja zvaničnih kineskih narativa. Kvantitativna analiza zvaničnih govora otkriva da su važne emocije (poniženje, bes i nadmoćnost), kao i politička upotreba istorije da bi se stvorili narativi čiji je cilj legitimizacija želje Kine da udalji Sjedinjene Američke Države iz upravljanja azijsko-pacifičkim pitanjima. Iako je kineski diskurs nepromenjen tokom svih administracija u SAD, ovaj rad će takođe pokazati da se pravni diskurs menja u skladu sa razvojem spora. Ovi nalazi omogućavaju bolje shvatanje kineske političke komunikacije o međunarodnom pravu i o sadašnjem međunarodnom poretku.
Reference
Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Allison, G. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucpdides’ Trap?, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Anghie, A. (2014). Towards a postcolonial international law. In: P. Singh, B. Mayer (eds.). Critical International Law: Postrealism, Postcolonialism and Transnationalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123-142.
An-Na’im, A. A. (1995). Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: A Quest for Consensus, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Blum, Y. (1965). Historic Titles in International Law, Martinus Nijhoff.
Boon, K. (2014). International arbitration in highly political situations: The South China Sea dispute and international law, Washington University global studies law review, 13 (3), 487-514.
Brook, T. (2019). Great State: China and the World, London: Profile Books.
Buszynski, L. (2017). Law and realpolitik: The arbitral tribunal’s ruling and the South China Sea, Asian yearbook of international law, 21, 121-140.
Buzan, B., Lawson, G. (2014). Rethinking benchmark dates in international relations, European Journal of International Relations, 20 (2), 437-462.
Callahan, W. A., Barabantseva, E. (2012). China Orders the World: Normative Soft Power and Foreign Policy, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Chang, Y.-C. (2016). China’s non-participation approach toward the South China Sea arbitration, Chinese Taiwan yearbook of international law and affairs, 34, 56-72.
Chen, Z. (2018). Le retour de la Chine sur le devant de la scene: Vers un nouveau leadership facilitateur?, Revue defense nationale, 811, 39-54.
Chimni, B. S. (2006). Third World approaches to international law: A manifesto, International Community Law Review, 8 (1), 3-27.
Chiozza, G., Goemens, H. E. (2011). Leaders and International Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christensen, T. J. (2006). Fostering stability or creating a monster? The rise of China and U.S. policy toward East Asia, International Security, 31 (1), 81-126.
Clark, I. (2014). International society and China: The power of norms and norms of power, Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7 (3), 315-340.
Clement, M., Lindemann, T., Sangar, E. (2017). The ’hero-protector narrative’: Manufacturing emotional consent for the use of force, Political Psychology, 38 (6), 991-1008.
Coicaud, J.-M. (2016). The question of emotions and passions in mainstream international relations, and beyond. In: Ariffin Y., Coicaud, J.-M., Popovski, V. (eds.). Emotions in International Politics: Beyond Mainstream International Relations, New York, Cambridge: University Press, 23-47.
Cronon, W. (1992). A place for stories: Nature, history, and narrative, The Journal of American History, 78 (4), 1347-1376.
Cunningham-Cross, L., Callahan, W. (2011). Ancient Chinese power, modern Chinese thought, The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 4 (4), 349-374.
DeLisle, J. (2012). Troubled Waters: China’s claims and the South China Sea. ORBIS, 56 (4), 608-642.
Deron, L. (2021). Les enjeux de la nouvelle puissance normative chinoise, Diplomatie, 62.
Dutton, M. (2002). Lead us not to translation, Nepantla: Views from South, 3 (3), 495-537.
Dixon, J. (2017). Rhetorical Adaptation and Resistance to International Norms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dupuy, F., Dupuy, P M. (2013). A legal analysis of China’s historic rights claim in the South China Sea. American Journal of International Law, 107 (1), 124-141.
Dyson, S. B. (2009). The Blair Identity. Leadership and Foreign Policy, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis, London: Routledge.
Fels, E., Vu, T.-M. (eds.) (2016). Power Politics in Asias Contested Waters Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea, Springer.
Fierke, K. M. (2013). Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foot, R. (2020). China, the UN and Human Protection. Beliefs, Power, Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ford, C. A. (2015). The Mind of Empire. Chinas History and Modern Foreign Relations, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Fry, J. D., Loja, M. H. (2014). The roots of historic title: Non-western pre-colonial normative systems and legal resolution of territorial disputes, Leiden Journal of International Law, 27, 727-754.
Friedberg, A. L. (2005). The Future of U.S.-China Relations. Is Conflict Inevitable?, International Security, 30 (2), 7-45.
Fung, C. (2019). China and Intervention at the UN Security Council: Reconciling Status, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, A. (2020). China’s grand strategy under Xi Jinping: Reassurance, reform and Resistance, International Security, 45 (1), 164-201.
Grandpierron, M. (2024). Nostalgic Virility as a Cause of War: How Leaders of Great Powers Cope with Status Decline, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Grandpierron, M., Pomes, E. (2024). Chinese discursive strategies during the Syrian civil war: Communicating opposition to Western understanding of human rights and R2P. In: M. Zreik (ed.). Soft Power and Diplomatic Strategies in Asia and the Middle East, Hershey, Igi Global. 75-87.
Grydehoj, A., Su, P. (2022). China and the Pursuit of Harmony in WorldPolitics: Understanding Chinese International Relations Theory, Abingdon: Routledge.
Halperin, S., Heath, O. (2017). Political Research: Methods and Practical Skills, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayton, B. (2017). When good lawyers write bad history: Unreliable evidence and the South China Sea territorial dispute, Ocean Development and International Law, 48 (1), 17-34.
Heilman, S., Schmidt, D. (2014). Chinas Foreign Political and Economic Relations: An Unconventional Global Power, New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Hermann, M. G. (2001). How decision units shape foreign policy: A theoretical framework, International Studies Review, 3 (2), 47-81.
Heritage, A., Lee, P. K. (2020). Order, contestation and ontological security-seeking in the South China Sea. Palgrave Macmillan.
Horowitz, M. C., Stam, A. C., Ellis, C. M. (2016). Why Leaders Fight, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Houlden, G., Hong, N. (eds.) (2018). Maritime Order and the Law in East Asia, London: Routledge.
Hsiung, J. C. (2015). Utility vs. Inadequacy of realist theory: Assessing China’s rise, International Studies Review, 17 (2), 132-137.
Hurd, I. (2019). How to Do Things with International Law. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Huters, T. (2005). Bringing the world home: appropriating the West in late Qing and early Republican China, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Hwang, Y-J., Frettingham, E. (eds.) (2021). Maritime and Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea Faces of Power and Law in the Age of China’s Rise. London: Routledge. In the matter of the South China Sea arbitration, PCA Case no. 2013-19 (PCA 12 July 2016).
Jervis, R. (2017). How Statesmen Think. The Psychology of International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Johnston, A. I. (2019). ‘China in a World of Orders’, International Security, 44 (2), 9-60.
Johnston, R. (2021). US Foreign Policy. Domestic Roots and International Impact, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Jorgensen, M. (2018). Equilibrium and fragmentation in the international rule of law: The rising Chinese geolegal order, KFG Working Paper Series, 21 Berlin Potsdam Research Group. The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline.
Keohane, R. (2021). The Global Politics Paradigm: Guide to the Future or Only the Recent Past?’. International Theory, 13 (1), 112-121.
Khong, Y. F. (1992). Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kliem, F. (2022). Great Power Competition and Order Building in the Indo-Pacific. Towards a new Indo-Pacific Equilibrium, London: Routledge.
Klotz, A., Prakash, D. (eds.) (2008). Qualitative Methods in International Relations. A Pluralist Guide, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Ku, J. (2016). The significance of China’s rejection of the South China Sea arbitration for its approach to international dispute settlement and international law, Chinese Taiwan yearbook of International Law and Affairs, 34, 73-103.
Kwak, J.-H. (2021). Global justice without self-centrism: Tianxia in dialogue on mount Uisan. Dao, 20, 289-307.
Lakoff, G. (2009). The Political Mind. A Cognitive Scientists Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics, London: Penguin Books.
Langer, L. (2018). The South China Sea as a challenge to International Law and to international legal scholarship, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 36 (3), 383-417.
Lebow, R. N. (2010). Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lindemann, T. (2010). Causes of War: The Strugglefor Recognition, Colchester: ECPR Press.
Lindemann, T. (2023). Theorising danger or dangerous theories? Positivist data and the making of the China threat, Political Anthropological Research on International Social Science, 4, 142-172.
Loja, M. H. (2018). A critical legal approach to the South China Sea territorial dispute. Journal of the History of International Law, 20 (2), 198-216.
Lowenheim, O. & Heimann, G. (2008). Revenge in international politics, Security Studies, 17 (4), 685-724.
McCourt, D. M. (2014). Britain and World Power since 1945. Constructing a Nations Role in International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). The Tragedy of GreatPower Politics, New York: Norton & Company.
Murray, M. (2018). The Structure for Recognition in International Relations. Status, Recognition, and Rising Powers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nguyen, T. H. (2018). Les conflits frontaliers sino-vietnamiens de 1885 а nos jours, Demopolis.
Nolan, C. (2006). Great powers and international society. In: W. Bain (ed.). The Empire of Security and the Safety of the People, London: Routledge, 71-93.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paul, T. V., Welch Larson, D., Wolhforth, W. C. (eds.) (2014). Status in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paul, T. V. (2016). Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present and Future, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, A. (2021). How the East Was Won: Barbarian Conquerors, Universal Conquest and the Making of Modern Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomes, E., Coicaud, J.-M. (2021). The emotional backdrop of legal discourses in the South China Sea Disputes, Polish Political Science Yearbook, 50 (1), 25-42.
Pomes, E., Grandpierron, M. (2024). ‘Unpacking the discursive strategies and drivers of Chinese visions of an alternative world order: History and emotions in the South China Sea dispute’. In: M, Sahakyan (ed.). Routledge Handbook of Chinese and Eurasian International Relations, New York: Routledge, 291-305.
Popovski, V. (2016). Emotions and international law. In: Ariffin, Y., Coicaud, J.-M., Popovski V. (eds.). Emotions in International Politics: Beyond Mainstream International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184-203.
Propp, V. I. (1968). Morphology of Folktale, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Raine, S., Le Miere, C. (2013). RegionalDisorder. The South China Sea Disputes, New York: Routledge.
Rees, M. (2022). Ideas and the Use of Force in American Foreign Policy. Presidential Decision- Making in a Post-Cold War World, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Renshon, J. (2017). Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Roberts, K., Bano, S. (2023). The Ascendency of Regional Powers in Contemporary US-China Relations. Rethinking the Great Power Rivalry, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ruhlig, T. (2018). How China Approaches International Law: Implications for Europe, Bruxelles.
Sahakyan, M. (ed.) (2023). China and Eurasian Powers in a Multipolar World Order 2.0: Security, Diplomacy, Economy and Cyberspace, New York: Routledge.
Sahakyan, M. (2024). Routledge Handbook od Chinese and Eurasian International Relations, New York: Routledge.
Saurette, P. (2008). ‘You dissin me? Humiliation and post 9/11 global politics’, Review of International Studies, 32 (3), 495-522.
Serfaty, S. (2022). America and the World from Truman to Biden. Play it again, Sam, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shen, J. (2002). China’s sovereignty over the South China Sea Islands: A historical Perspective, Chinese Journal of International Law, 1 (1), 94-157.
Sloss, D. L., Dickinson, L. A. (2022). The Russia-Ukraine War and the Seeds of a New Liberal Plurilateral Order, American Journal of International Law, 116 (4), 798-809.
Tully, J. (1988). Meaningand Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Van Evera, S. (1998). Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War, International Security, 22 (4), 5-43.
Walt, S. M. (1996). Revolution and War, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ward, S. (2020). Status and the Challenge of RisingPowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, J. (2019). A world safe for autocracy? China’s rise and the future of global politics, Foreign Affairs, 98 (13), 1-145.
Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (eds.) (2016). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, London: Sage.
Yan, X. (2019). Leadership and the Rise of GreatPowers, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yahri-Milo, K. (2018). Who Fights for Reputation. The Psychology of Leaders in International Conflict, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zarakol, A. (2022). Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, F., Lebow, R. N. (2022). Justice and International Order: East and West, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhao, S. (2015). Rethinking the Chinese world order: The imperial cycle and the rise of China, Journal of Contemporary China, 24 (96), 961-982.
Zhao, T., Harroff, J. E., Westad, O. A. (2021). All Under Heaven: The Tianxia System for a Possible World Order, Oakland: University of California Press.
Zou, K., Wu, S., Ye, Q. (eds.) (2020). The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Challenges and Opportunities for Asia and Europe, London: Routledge.
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2025 Sociološki pregled
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.