(Još jednom) O konceptu bezbednosti i skica modifikovane teorije sekuritizacije

Dejan Petrović

doi:10.5937/socpreg59-59781

Dejan D. Petrović Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet bezbednosti, Beograd (Srbija) https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6843-7050

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg59-59781

Ključne reči: pojam bezbednosti, sekuritizacija, ideologija, državni ideološki aparati, država

Sažetak

Glavni predmet istraživanja ovog rada jeste pojam bezbednosti. No, konceptualna analiza je obavljena na specifičan način, to jest kroz izlaganje grubog nacrta modifikacije popularne teorije sekuritizacije. Bezbednost se posmatra kao vrednost čije je postojanje povezano sa očuvanjem etabliranog vrednosnog sistema određenog društva, što se koristi kao osnova za dalje promišljanje prirode odnosa bezbednosti i ideologije. Stanovište da bezbednost kao vrednost može biti bez poteškoća uključena u postojeće ideološke sisteme, omogućava da ona bude predmet Altiserovih državnih ideoloških aparata. Korišćenjem teorija države i ideologije francuskog filozofa prevazilaze se glavni nedostaci teorije sekuritizacije, odnosno slaba vidljivost strukturalnih faktora koji omogućavaju realizaciju pomenutog procesa.

Reference

Althusser, L. (2009). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Beograd: Karpos. [In Serbian]

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.

Baldwin, A. D. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23 (1), 5–26. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097464.

Barnet, R. J. (1985). The Ideology of the National Security State. The Massachusetts Review, 26 (4), 483–500. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25089685.

Booth, K. (2005). Critical Explorations. In: K. Booth (ed.) Critical Security Studies and World Politics, 1–21. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O., De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.

Buzan, B. (1983). People, States, and Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

Foucault, M. (2014). Security, Territory, Population. Novi Sad: Mediterran Publishing. [In Serbian]

Heywood, A. (2005). Political Ideologies. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]

Jacob, E. D. (2017). Security Matters: Reflections on the Power of Prudence. In: E. D. Jacob (ed.). Rethinking Security in the Twenty-First Century, 17–33. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52542-0.

Johnson, D. (1993). Introduction: Louis Althusser 1918–1990. In: L. Althusser. The Future Lasts Forever: A Memoir, vi–xviii. New York: The New Press.

Petrović, D. (2022). From Race to Mass – The Influence of Political and Economic Transformation of Austro–Hungarian Society on The Changes in Ludwig Gumplowicz’s Social Theory. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu (Doctoral Dissertation). Available at: https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/21441 [In Serbian]

Rothschild, E. (1995). What Is Security? Daedalus, 124 (3), 53–98. Available at: https:// www.jstor.org/stable/20027310.

Stępka, M. (2022). Identifying Security Logics in the EU Policy Discourse. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93035-6.

Ugilt, R. (2017). Security and Ideology. Jacob, E. D. (ed.). Rethinking Security in the Twenty-First Century, 3–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-52542-0_1.

Wæver, O. (2012). Aberystwyth, Paris, Copenhagen: the Europeanness of new “schools” of security theory in an American field. In: A. B. Tickner and D. L. Blaney (eds.). Thinking International Relations Differently, 48–71. London and New York: Routledge.

Wolfers, A. (1952). “National Security” as an Ambiguous Symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67 (4), 481–502. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2145138.