The river Ganga and its pollution- Tourists’ perception visiting Ghats of Varanasi
Sažetak
The study attempts to assess tourists’ (international, national and local) perceptions for polluted state of the river Ganga in Varanasi, plausible reasons for present status and their willingness to contribute towards river cleanliness. The Kruskal-Wallis analysis suggests variation in perception for pollution and river reverence across three categories of tourists. Tourists perceived the present status of river to be dirty and urged that it can only be improved by joint efforts of people and government. Further, positive response of tourists was observed for their involvement in cleanliness drive of the river Ganga via their willingness to pay and social activities.
Reference
Alley, K.D. 1994. Ganga and Gandagi: Interpretations of pollution and waste in Benaras. Ethnology 33(2), 127-145.
Alley, K.D. 2002. On the banks of the Gaṅgā: When wastewater meets a sacred river. University of Michigan Press.
Baca, E.A. 2015. The Ganges river: symbology, sustainability, and the confluence of cultural and fluvial connectivity (Doctoral dissertation).
Bennett, N. J. 2016. Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 30(3), 582-592.
Bernard, H.R. 2002. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods. 3rd edition. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.
Bird, D. K. 2009. The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation–a review of current knowledge and practice. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9(4), 1307-1325.
Bulmer, M. (Eds.) 2004. Questionnaires. Sage Publications, London.
Buzinde, C. N., Kalavar, J. M., Kohli, N., Manuel-Navarrete, D. 2014. Emic understandings of Kumbh Mela pilgrimage experiences. Annals of Tourism Research 49, 1-18.
CSE, Centre for Science and Environment. 2014. “Can we save Ganga” in Down to earth. 31 July 2014, fortnightly magazine. New Delhi India, (http://www.downtoearth.org.in/).
Das, P., Tamminga, K. R. 2012. The Ganges and the GAP: An assessment of efforts to clean a Sacred River. Sustainability 4(8), 1647-1668.
Drew, G. 2011. Ganga is Disappearing: Women, Development, and Contentious Practice on the Ganges River (Ph. D dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
Eck, D. L. 1982. Banaras, city of light. Columbia University Press.
Elhance, D.N, Elhance, V., Aggarwal, B.M. 2009. Fundamentals of Statistics (LIIIrd Rep.ed.). Kitab Mahal, 22-A, Sarojini Naidu Marg, Allahabad.
Freeman III, W. J. 1991. The physiology of perception. Scientific American 264(2), 78-85.
Gallagher, A.J., Cooke, S.J., Hammerschlag, N. 2015. Risk perceptions and conservation ethics among recreational anglers targeting threatened sharks in the subtropical Atlantic. Endangered Species Research 29(1), 81-93.
Gangwar, K. K., Joshi, B. D. 2008. A preliminary study on solid waste generation at Har Ki Pauri, Haridwar, around the Ardh-Kumbh period of sacred bathing in the river Ganga in 2004. The environmentalist 28(3), 297-300.
Gesler, W. M., Pierce, M. 2000. Hindu Varanasi. Geographical Review 90(2), 222-237.
Hamner, S., Damon P., Michelle W., Gopal P., Rajesh K. M., Veer B. M., Catherine P., Timothy E. F. 2013. Sewage pollution of the River Ganga: an ongoing case study in Varanasi, India. River Systems, 20(3), 157-167.
Hamner, S., Tripathi, A., Mishra, R. K., Bouskill, N., Broadaway, S. C., Pyle, B. H., Ford, T. E. 2006. The role of water use patterns and sewage pollution in incidence of water-borne/enteric diseases along the Ganges river in Varanasi, India. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 16(2), 113-132.
Huberman, J. 2012. Ambivalent encounters: childhood, tourism, and social change in Banaras, India: Rutgers University Press.
Huntington, H.P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1270-1274.
Imandoust, S. B., Gadam, S. N. 2007. Are people willing to pay for river water quality, contingent valuation. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 4(3), 401-408.
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Psychology Press.
Karmel, T.S., Jain, M. 1987. Comparison of purposive and random sampling schemes for estimating capital expenditure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52-57.
Lochtefeld, J. 2010. God's gateway: Identity and meaning in a Hindu pilgrimage place. Oxford University Press.
Lund, J.F., Balooni, K., Puri, L. 2010. Perception-based methods to evaluate conservation impact in forests managed through popular participation. Ecology and Society 15(3), 5.
McDonald, J. H. 2009. Handbook of biological statistics. Sparky House Publishing Baltimore, Maryland.
McDonald, J.H. 2014. Handbook of Biological Statistics (3rd ed.). Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tàbara, D., Tippett, J. 2007. Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society 12(1), 19.
Nachar, N. 2008. The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 4(1), 13-20.
Normelani, E., Djati, M.S., Hidayat, T., Hakim, L. 2015. Tourist profiles and perception as a basic planning for sustainable tourism development Lok Baitan Floating Market, South Kalimantan. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 9(11), 11-16.
Olsen, D. H., Timothy, D. J. 2006. Tourism and religious journey. In D.J. Timothy & Olsen, D.H (Eds.) Tourism, religion and spiritual journeys. USA and Canada: Routledge press, 1-22.
Parry, J. P. 1994. Death in Banaras. Cambridge University Press.
Prideaux, B., Timothy, D.J., Cooper, M. 2009. Introducing river tourism: Physical, Ecological and Human aspects. In B. Prideaux & M. Cooper (Eds.) River tourism. MPG Books Group, U.K, 1-22.
Rai, B. 2013. Pollution and conservation of Ganga river in modern India. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3(4), 1-4.
Rajeev, Dr. P.V., Shyju, Dr. P.V. (2008). Key Issues in Visitor Experience and Tourism Development - A Study of Varanasi, Conference on Tourism in India – Challenges Ahead, 15-17 May 2008, Part XI – Health, Spiritual and Heritage Tourism, IIMK 495-501.
Rana, P. S., Singh, R. P. 2004. Behavioural Perspective of Pilgrims and tourists in Banaras (Kashi) India. The Tourist-A Psychological Perspective. New Delhi: Kanishka Publisher
Regional tourist Office Varanasi., 2016, Uttar Pradesh Tourism, Government of Uttar Pradesh, India (Obtained the data).
Sharma, S., Roy, A., Agrawal, M. 2016. Spatial variations in water quality of river Ganga with respect to land uses in Varanasi. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-11.
Singh, R.P.B. 2004. The Ganga riverfront in Varanasi, a heritage zone in contestation. Context: Built, Living and Natural 1(1), 25-30.
Singh, R.P.B. 2011. Varanasi, India’s cultural heritage city: contestation, conservation & planning. In R.P.B Singh, (Eds.), Heritagescapes and cultural landscapes. Planet Earth & cultural understanding series (pp. 205-254). New Delhi: Shubhi Publications.
Soemarno, I. 2010. A ‘Simple’Solution Proposal for Riverbank Settlement Problems in Surabaya. Environment and Urbanization Asia 1(2), 209-222.
Tremblay, M.A. 1957. The key informant technique: a non-ethnographic application. American Anthropologist 59, 699-701.
Weng, C.N. 2005. Sustainable management of rivers in Malaysia: Involving all stakeholders. International Journal of River Basin Management 3(3), 147-162.
http://www2.unwto.org/ assessed date 12 July 2016
http://india-wris.nrsc.gov.in assessed date 12 July 2016
unwto.org assessed date 18 July 2016
http://varanasi.nic.in assessed date 20 July 2016.
