English English
Sažetak
The present study aims to investigate the effect of paternalistic leadership on the performance and organizational identification of employees.The research has adopted the quantitative approach and data collected from population comprised employees in five star accommodation establishments located in Antalya.In order to represent the research population,the convenience sampling method was used to determine the sample,and in 2021 summer season 380 questionnaires obtained from the sample were analysed.Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the scale variables.According to the results,a positive and significant relationship was found between the paternalistic leadership perception,and employee performance and organizational identification.Paternalistic leadership perception explained 6% of the change in employee performance.In addition,paternalistic leadership behaviour explained 11.1% of the variance of organizational identification.Significant and positive relationship were found between the subdimension of paternalist leadership (creating a family environment (t=3.073,p≤.01),expectation of loyalty and deference (t=2.061,p≤.05)) and organizational identification.And another positive relation was found between sub dimension of paternalist leadership (creating a family environment at workplace (t=2.328,p≤.05)) and performance.This research will be the first study in the tourism sector in Turkey in terms of paternalistic leadership,employee performance and organizational identification.Since there is no other study in the literature in which these three variables are investigated together in the field of tourism,it will fill the gap in the research area.
Reference
References
Al-Malki, M., & Juan, W. 2018. Leadership styles and job performance: A literature review. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 3(3), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.33.3004
Arun, K., Şen, C., & Okun, O. 2020. How does leadership effectiveness related to the context? Paternalistic leadership on non-financial performance within a cultural tightness-looseness model?. JEEMS Journal of East European Management Studies, 25(3), 503-529. doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2020-3
Aycan, Z. 2001. Paternalizm: Yönetim ve Liderlik Anlayışına İlişkin Üç Görgül Çalışma. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 1-19.
Aycan, Z. 2006. Paternalism. U. Kim, , K. Yang, & K. Hwang içinde, Indigenous and Cultural Psychology: Understanding People in Context (s. 445-466). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca , M., Yu, K., Dell, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. 2000. Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison. Applied psychology, 49(1), 192-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00010
Aycan, Z., Schyns, B., Sun, J.-M., Felfe, J., & Saher, N. 2013. Paternalistic Leadership Questionnaire—Short Form (PLQ) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/t36940-000
Babalola, S. 2016. The effect of leadership style, job satisfaction and employee-supervisor relationship on job performance and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Business Research, 32(3), 935-946. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i3.9667
Baysak, B. 2020. Liderliğin Firma Performansına Etkisinde Girişimcilik Eğiliminin Aracı Rolü ve Ulusal Kültürün Düzenleyici Etkisi: Teknopark Firmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitisü İşletme Ana Bilim Dalı Doktora Tezi.
Bing, S. 2004. Sun Tzu was a sissy: Conquer your enemies, promote your friends, and wage the real art of war. Harper Collins.
Borman, W., & Motowidlo, S. 1997. Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human performance, 10(2), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3
Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. 2012. Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203180990
Büyüköztürk, Ş. 2018. Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Atıf İndeksi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9789756802748
Chen, W. J. 2013. Factors influencing internal service quality at international tourist hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 152-160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.06.004
Chan, S., Huang, X., Snape, E., & Lam, C. 2013. The Janus face of paternalistic leaders: Authoritarianism, benevolence, subordinates' organization‐based self‐esteem, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), s. 108-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1797
Chen, X., Eberly, M., Chiang, T., & Farh, J. 2014. Affective trust in Chinese leaders: Linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of management, 40(3), s. 796-819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410604
Cheng, B., Chou, L., & Fang, J. 2000. Paternalistic Leadership scale: construction and measure of a triple model. Indigenous Psychology Journal, 14, 3-64. https://doi.org/10.1037/t35288-000
Combs, J. G., Crook, T. R., & Rauch, A. 2019. Meta‐analytic research in management: Contemporary approaches, unresolved controversies, and rising standards. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12427
Çelen, Y. 2022. Kamu Kurumlarında Çalışan Yöneticilerin Örgüt İklimi Algılarının Ve Babacan Liderlik Tarzlarının Örgütsel Özdeşleşme Üzerindeki Etkisi: Çanakkale İlinde Bir Araştırma. Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü (Yüksek Lisans Tez).
Çetinkaya, M., & Çimenci, S. 2014. Örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi ve örgütsel özdeşleşmenin aracılık rolü: Yapısal eşitlik modeli çalışması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(23), 237-278.
Çöl , G. 2008. Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.31671/dogus.2019.220
David Pincus, J. 2006. Communication Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance. Human Communication Research , 12(3), 395–419. doi:10.1111/J.1468-2958.1986.Tb00084.X
Delice, A., & Ergene, Ö. 2015. Ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarının incelenmesi: Matematik eğitimi makaleleri örneği. Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 60-75.
Dutton, J., Dukerich, J., & Harquail, C. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
Edwards, M., & Peccei, R. 2007. Organizational identification: Development and testing of a conceptually grounded measure. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320601088195
Erben, G., & Güneşer, A. 2008. The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), s. 955-968.
Farh, J., Cheng, B., Chou, L., & Chu, X. 2006. Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China.in A. Tsui, Y. Bian, & L. Cheng (Ed.) China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance. (s. 230-260) New York: Sharpe.
Hall, D., Schneider, B., & Harold, T. 1970. Personal Factors in Organizational Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), s. 176–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391488
Hatipoğlu, Z., Akduman, G., & Demir, B. 2019. Babacan liderlik tarzının çalışan görev performansı ve duygusal bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), s. 279-292.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London: Sage.
Karabey, C., & İşcan, Ö. 2007. Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, Örgütsel İmaj ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlik Davranişi İlişkisi: Bir Uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(2), 231-241.
Karakoç, A. 2018. İş Tatmininin Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Gören Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sigorta Acentesi Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(4), 1371-1388.
Karanika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H., & Griffiths, M. 2015. Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 1019-1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2013-0359
Katı, Y., & Toptaş, A. 2021. Paternalist liderliğin iş performansı ve alt boyutlarına etkisi: X, Y ve Z kuşakları üzerine bir araştırma . Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi , 24(46), s. 1073-1092. doi:10.31795/baunsobed.941355
Kerse, G., & Karabey, C. 2017. Algılanan örgütsel desteğin örgütsel özdeşleşmeye etkisi: Örgütsel sinizmin aracı rolü. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(4), s. 375-398. ISSN: 1624-7215
Kim, U. 1994. Significance of Paternalism and communialism in the occupational welfare system of Korean Firms: A national survey. In H. Triandis, Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı, S. Choi, & G. Yoo, Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, method and applications (s. 251-266). London: Sage.
Kirkman, B., & Rosen, B. 2000. Powering up teams. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), s. 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88449-1
Köksal, O. 2011. Bir Kültürel Liderlik Paradoksu: Paternalizm. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 8(15), 101 - 122.
Lau, E. W. 2012. A study of effective leadership in the Chinese context. Academy of Management 2012 Annual Meeting. Boston: MA.
Likert, R. 1961. New Patterns of Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Longshore, J. 1987. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. https://doi.org/10.2307/258081
Maccoby, M. 2004. Why people follow the leader: The power of transference. Harvard Business Review, 82(9), 76-85. PMID: 15449857.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
Mathur, P., Aycan, Z., & Kanungo, R. 1996. Work cultures in Indian organisations: A comparison between public and private sector. Psychology and Developing Societies, 8(2), s. 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/097133369600800202
Özçelik, G., & Cenkci, T. 2014. Moderating effects of job embeddedness on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and in-role job performance. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, s. 872-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.096
Padavic, I., & Earnest, W. 1994. Paternalism as a component of managerial strategy. Social Science Journal,, 31(4), 389-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(94)90031-0
Pellegrini, E., & Scandura, T. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of management, 34(3), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316063
Redmond, J., & Sharafizad, J. 2020. Discretionary effort of regional hospitality small business employees: Impact of non-monetary work factors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102452
Rehman, M., & Afsar, B. 2012. The impact of paternalistic leadership on organization commitment and organization citizenship behaviour. Journal of Business Management and Applied Economics, 5(5), s. 148-159.
Saygili, M., Özer, Ö., & Karakaya, P. 2020. Paternalistic leadership, ethical climate and performance in health staff. Hospital topics, 98(1), s. 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2020.1726848
Schermerhorn, J., Hunt, G., & Osborn, R. 1985. Managing Organizational Behavior. NewYork: John & Sons Publishing.
Schroeder, J. L. 2011. The Impact of Paternalism and Organizational Collectivism in Multinational and Family-Owned Firms in Turkey. A Thesis Submitted for thr Degree of Master of Arts to University of South Florida.
Sigler, T., & Pearson, C. 2000. Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00011-0
Silin, R. 1976. Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises (62). Harvard Univ Asia Center. https://doi.org/10.1163/9781684171934
Sökmen, A., & Bıyık, Y. 2016. Örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel özdeşleşme, kişi-örgüt uyumu ve iş tatmini ilişkisi: Bilişim uzmanlarına yönelik bir araştırma. International Journal of Informatics Technologies, 9(2), 221.
Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. 2008. Job performance. The Sage handbook of organizational behavior, 1, 427-447. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448.n24
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. 2013. Using Multivariate Statistics (6). Boston: Pearson.
Tajfel, H. 1978. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.In H. Tajfel, Social categorization, social identity and social comparison (s. 61–76). London: Academic Press.
Taşdemir, F. Performans değerlendirme yöntemleri nelerdir? Kolayik.com: https://kolayik.com/ikutuphane/performans-degerlendirme-yontemleri-nelerdir/ (2017, 10 24).
Tekin, E. 2019. Paternalist liderliğin iş tatmini ve çalışan performansına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 54(1), s. 178-204. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.19.03.1087
Tuan, L. T. 2018. Driving employees to serve customers beyond their roles in the Vietnamese hospitality industry: The roles of paternalistic leadership and discretionary HR practices. Tourism Management, 69, 132-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.007
Ugurluoglu, O., Aldogan, E., Turgut, M., & Ozatkan, Y. 2018. The effect of paternalistic leadership on job performance and intention to leave the job. Journal of Health Management, 20(1), s. 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063417747700
Uludağ, G. 2018. Örgütsel Bağlılık İle İşgören Performansı İlşkisini İncelemeye Yönelik Bir Alan Araştırması. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.520926
Usta, I. 2012. Ödüllendirmenin örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi: İstanbul'daki beş yıldızlı otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Master's thesis, Trakya Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Wang, H., & Kwan, K. 2017. A study on the influence of paternalistic leadership on organizational commitment: Focus on the mediating effect of organizational identification. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 8(2), s. 109-116. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2017.8.2.548
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 2). California: University of California press.
Yarmacı, N. 2012. Psikolojik güçlendirmenin örgütsel özdeşleşmeye etkisi: Otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Master's thesis,Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Yeşiltaş, M., Gürlek, M., Tuna, M., Kanten, P., & Çeken, H. 2022. Paternalistic leadership and organizational identification: The mediating role of forgiveness climate. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 23(3), s. 546-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2020.1805089
Yüzbaşioğlu , N., & Doğan, O. 2018. Relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment in hospitality industry: Case of Antalya, Turkey. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(1), s. 163-173. https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2018-0017
Zhuang, W., Lee, C., & Ma, C. 2021. Hotel Employees’ Voice Behavior: The Role of Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Identification. Sustainability, 14(1), s. 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010256
