Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in pediatric acute appendicitis

  • Nikola D Stanković Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia
  • Ivan Stanojević
  • Dragan Đorđević
  • Zoran Kostić
  • Ivo Udovičić
  • Maja Miličković
  • Đorđe Savić
  • Blagoje Grujić
  • Slaviša Đuričić
  • Maja Šurbatović

Abstract


Background/Aim. Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most frequent emergency and appendectomy is the most frequent abdominal operation in the pediatric surgery. Diagnosis of AA in children is more difficult due to lack of cooperation and poor clinical history data, leading to significant number of misdiagnostic cases. Our aim was to explore whether neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be useful in diagnosis and follow up of acute appendicitis in children. Methods. Prospective investigation of NLR values in 129 consecutive patients admitted to the Mother and Child Healthcare Institute of Serbia and referred for surgery due to acute appendicitis was performed. According to the pathohistological findings, patients were divided into three groups: normal/early, uncomplicated (phlegmonous) and complicated (gangrenous or/and perforated) acute appendicitis. Laboratory analysis were done preoperativly and on the first and the third postoperative days. Results. Statistically significant differences of NLR values were found in the different time points in total of patients and per groups. Some statistically significant differences of NLR values between pathohistological groups were recorded. Investigations of correlation of NLR and the other laboratory and clinical parameters showed strong positive correlation between NLR and C-reactive protein postoperatively and between NLR and PAS (Pediatric Appendicitis Score) preoperatively. Strong negative correlation with preoperative symptoms duration (PSD) were also present. Optimal cutoff NLR value between negative and positive appendectomies was 6.14. Conclusion.  NLR well monitor progression of AA in children, it’s cutoff values may hepl in distinguishing the phases of AA and it should be used in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.

References

Cheong LA, Emil S. Outcomes of pediatric appendicitis: An in-ternational comparison of the United States and Canada. JA-MA Surg 2014; 149(1): 50−5.

Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based anal-ysis. JAMA 2001; 286(14): 1748−53.

Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, Boris J, Ströberg P, Tronstad SE, et al. Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study. Surg Endosc 2001; 15(2): 200−2.

Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Discon-nect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated ap-pendicitis: Implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 2007; 245(6): 886−92.

Velanovich V, Satava R. Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: Implications for quality assurance. Am Surg 1992; 58(4): 264−9.

Butler C. Surgical pathology of acute appendicitis. Hum Pathol 1981; 12(10): 870−8.

Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di SS, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute ap-pendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015; 386(10000): 1278−87.

Yu CW, Juan LI, Wu MH, Shen CJ, Wu JY, Lee CC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 2013; 100(3): 322−9.

Yazici M, Ozkisacik S, Oztan MO, Gursoy H. Neutro-phil/lymphocyte ratio in the diagnosis of childhood appendici-tis. Turk J Pediatr 2010; 52: 400−3.

Hoffbrand AV, Moss PA, Pettit JE. Essential haematology. Ox-ford: Blackwell; 2006. p. 94−103.

Jahangiri M, Wyllie JH. Peripheral blood lymphopenia in gan-grenous appendicitis. BMJ 1990; 301(6745): 215.

Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37(6): 877−81.

Bhatt M, Joseph L, Ducharme FM, Dougherty G, McGillivray D. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16(7): 591−6.

Goldman RD, Carter S, Stephens D, Antoon R, Mounstephen W, Langer JC. Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr 2008; 153(2): 278−82.

Erturk A, Tuncer IS, Balci O, Karaman I, Karaman A, Afsarlar CE, et al. The Value of Pediatric Appendicitis Score and La-boratory Findings on the Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis. Turk J Pediatr 2015; 2: 79−84.

Nathan C. Neutrophils and immunity: Challenges and oppor-tunities. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6(3): 173−82.

Lee SL, Ho HS. Acute appendicitis: Is there a difference be-tween children and adults. Am Surg 2006; 72(5): 409−13.

Paajanen H, Mansikka A, Laato M, Ristamäki R, Pulkki K, Kos-tiainen S. Novel serum inflammatory markers in acute appendi-citis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2002; 62(8): 579−84.

Wu HP, Lin CY, Chang CF, Chang YJ, Huang CY. Predictive value of C-reactive protein at different cutoff levels in acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 2005; 23(4): 449−53.

Svensson JF, Patkova B, Almström M, Naji H, Hall NJ, Eaton S, et al. Nonoperative treatment with antibiotics versus surgery for acute nonperforated appendicitis in children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015; 261(1): 67−71.

Kahramanca S, Ozgehan G, Seker D, Gökce EI, Seker G, Tunç G, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2014; 20(1): 19−22.

Shimizu T, Ishizuka M, Kubota K. A lower neutrophil to lym-phocyte ratio is closely associated with catarrhal appendicitis versus severe appendicitis. Surg Today 2016; 46(1): 84−9.

Published
2020/10/22
Section
Original Paper