Diagnosis and surgical treatment of the posterior knee instability

  • Miodrag D Glisić Intitut for othopaedic surgery "Banjica", University of Belgrade School of Medicine
  • Zoran Blagojević Institute for Orthopaedic Surgery “Banjica”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Vladan Stevanović Institute for Orthopaedic Surgery “Banjica”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Branko Ristić Clinic for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Aleksandar Matić Clinic for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: knee injuries;, diagnosis;, posterior cruciate ligament;, orthopedic procedures;, arthroscopy;, treatment outcome

Abstract


Background/Aim. Posterior cruciate ligament is the primary stabilizer of the posterior tibia translation and secondary stabilizer of external tibial rotation as well as varus, valgus knee angulation. It is the strongest ligament in the knee that hurts the rarest. The aim of this study was to show the indications for surgery, present the surgical technique and give results of surgical treatment of posterior knee instability. Methods. The study icluded 12 patients who were tretaed surgically for posterior knee instabilility at the Institute for Orthopaedic Surgery  “Banjica“, Belgrade, in the period from 1st January 2010 to 1st January 2014. All of them had arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction of posterior crucuate ligament done with 4-strand hamstring tendon graft. Postoperative follow-up lasted approximately 42 months and Lysholm values and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were compared as well  as the clinical status. Results. All treated patients had Grade III of posterior instability. Combined injuries of the posterolateral corner and anterior cruciat ligament (75%) were very frequent. Preoperative mean value of Lysholm score was 45.92 and postoperative 85.92 what was statistically significant improvement, the same as subjective IKDC score whose mean value was 38.58 preoperatively and 89.75 after the surgery and rehabilitation. Clinical examination showed better posterior knee stability although in 50% of patients certain level of instability remains. Conclusion.  Arthro-scopic reconstruction with 4-strand hamstring tendon gives satisfactory result with posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The result of subjective feeling of patient is much better then objective clinical examination. Although surgical procedure is technically demanding, with physically active patients having grade III of posterior instability it provides better result than non-surgical treatment.

Author Biography

Miodrag D Glisić, Intitut for othopaedic surgery "Banjica", University of Belgrade School of Medicine

ortopedija

traumatologija lokomotornog sistema

References

Kennedy JC, Hawkins RJ, Willis RB, Danylchuck KD. Tension studies of human knee ligaments. Yield point, ultimate failure, and disruption of the cruciate and tibial collateral ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976; 58(3): 350−5.

Marinozzi G, Pappalardo S, Steindler R. Human knee ligaments: Mechanical tests and ultrastructural observations. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1983; 9(2): 231−40.

Prietto MP, Bain JR, Stonebrook SN, Settlage RA. Tensile strength of the human posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Transactions of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Orthop Res Soc 1988; 13: 195.

Fred F, Gabriel H. Normal anatomy and biomechanics of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2011; 19(2): 82−92.

Kennedy NI, Wijdicks CA, Goldsmith MT, Michalski MP, Devitt BM, Årøen A, et al. Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 1: The individual and collective function of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41(12): 2828−38.

Goyal K, Tashman S, Wang JH, Li K, Zhang X, Harner C. In vivo analysis of the isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee during functional activities. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40(4): 777−85.

Miyasaka KC, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Hirshman P. The incidence of knee ligament injuries in the general population. Am J Knee Surg 1991; 4: 3−8.

Van Dommelen BA, Fowler PJ. Anatomy of the posterior cru-ciate ligament: A review. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17(1): 24−9.

Dejour H, Walch G, Peyrot J, Eberhard P. The natural history of rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1988; 74(1): 35−43. (French)

Lobenhoffer P, Lattermann CH, Krettek CH, Blauth M, Tscherne H. Rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament: The best treatment today. Unfallchirurg 1996; 99(6): 382−99. (German)

Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27(3): 276−83.

Rubinstein RA Jr, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Vanmeter CD, Rettig AC. The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posteriorcruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22: (4) 550−7.

McRae R. Clinical orthopaedic examination. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.

Harner CD, Hoher J. Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26(3): 471−82.

Jacobi M, Reischl N, Wahl P, Gautier E, Jakob RP. Acute isolated injury of the posterior cruciate ligament treated by a dynamic anterior drawer brace: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(10): 1381−4.

Shelbourne KD, Jennings RW, Vahey TN. Magnetic resonance imaging of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: Assessment of healing. Am J Knee Surg 1999; 12(4): 209−13

Staubli HU, Noesberger B, Jakob RP. Stress radiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1992; 249: 1−27.

Dandy DJ, Pusey RJ. The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64(1): 92−4.

Fowler PJ, Messieh SS. Isolated posterior cruciate ligament inju-ries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 1987; 15(6): 553−7.

Shelbourne KD, Clark M, Gray T. Minimum 10-year follow-up of patients after an acute, isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury treated nonoperatively. Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41(7): 1526−33.

Torg JS, Barton TM, Pavlov H, Stine R. Natural history of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 246: 208−16.

Höher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A. Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11(5): 297−306.

May JH, Gillette BP, Morgan JA, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ, Levy BA. Transtibial versus inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An evidence-based systematic review. J Knee Surg 2010; 23(2): 73−9.

Coobs BR, Laprade RF, Griffith CJ, Nelson BJ. Biomechanical analysis of an isolated fibular (lateral) collateral ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus graft. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35(9): 1521−7.

Edson CJ, Fanelli GC, Beck JD. Postoperative rehabilitation of the posterior cruciate ligament. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2010; 18(4): 275−9.

Fanelli GC. Posterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: How slow should we go?. Arthroscopy 2008; 24(2): 234−5.

Miller MD, Bergfeld JA, Fowler PJ, Harner CD, Noyes FR. The posterior cruciate ligament injured knee: Principles of evalua-tion and treatment. Instr Course Lect 1999; 48: 199‒207.

Grassmayr MJ, Parker DA, Coolican MR, Vanwanseele B. Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency: Biomechanical and biological consequences and the outcomes of conservative treatment, a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport 2008; 11(5): 433−43.

Janousek AT, Jones DG, Clatworthy M, Higgins LD, Fu FH. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint. Sports Med 1999; 28(6): 429−41.

Del Buono A, Radmilovic J, Gargano G, Gatto S, Maffulli N. Aug-mentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21(5): 1050−63.

Kim YM, Lee CA, Matava MJ. Clinical results of arthroscopic singlebundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruc-tion: A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39(2): 425−34.

Kim SJ, Jung M, Moon HK, Kim SG, Chun YM. Anterolateral transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anatomical reconstruction of posterolateral corner insufficiency: Comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction over a 2- to 6. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39(3): 481−9.

Wang CJ, Chen HS, Huang TW, Yuan LJ. Outcome of surgical reconstruction for posterior cruciate and posterolateral insta-bilities of the knee. Injury 2002; 33(9): 815−21.

Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Ta-kagishi K. A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2006; 35(12): 568−71.

Toritsuka Y, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Nakamura N, Hamada M, Shino K. Comparison between the cross-sectional area of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts and multistranded hamstring ten-don grafts obtained from the same patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11(2): 81−4.

Chen CH, Chou SW, Chen WJ, Shih CH. Fixation strength of three different grafts types used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004; 12(5): 371−5.

Stevanović V, Blagojević Z, Petković A, Glišić M, Sopta J, Nikolić V, et al. Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Can we use it twice?. Int Orthop 2013; 37(12): 2475−81.

Fanelli GC, Beck JD, Edson CJ. Current concepts review: The posterior cruciate ligament. J Knee Surg 2010; 23(2): 61−72.

Covey DC, Sapega AA, Sherman GM. Testing for isometry dur-ing reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Anatom-ic and biomechanical considerations. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24(6): 740−6.

Galloway MT, Grood ES, Mehalik JN, Levy M, Saddler SC, Noyes FR. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An in vitro study of femoral and tibial graft placement. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24(4): 437−45.

Lutz GE, Palmitier RA, An KN, Chao EY. Comparison of tibiofemoral joint forces during open-kinetic-chain and closed-kinetic-chain exercises. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75(5): 732−9.

Sekiya JK, West RV, Ong BC, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Harner CD. Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2005; 21(9): 1042−50.

Clancy WG Jr, Sutherland TB. Combined posterior cruciate liga-ment injuries. Clin Sports Med 1994; 13(3): 629−47.

Skyhar MJ, Warren RF, Ortiz GJ, Schwartz E, Otis JC. The ef-fects of sectioning of the posterior cruciate ligament and the posterolateral complex on the articular contact pressures with-in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75(5): 694−9.

Strobel MJ, Weiler A, Schulz MS, Russe K, Eichhorn HJ. Arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage lesions in posterior cruciate ligament - deficient knees. Arthroscopy 2003; 19(3): 262−8.

Geissler WB, Whipple TL. Intraarticular abnormalities in association with posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21(6): 846−9.

Cosgarea AJ, Jay PR. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: Evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9(5): 297−307.

McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: Graft pretension and knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30(3): 312−7.

Chan YS, Yang SC, Chang CH, Chen AC, Yuan LJ, Hsu KY, et al. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate liga-ment with use of a quadruple hamstring tendon graft with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2006; 22(7): 762−70.

Wu CH, Chen AC, Yuan LJ, Chang CH, Chan YS, Hsu KY, et al. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament by using a quadriceps tendon autograft: A minimum 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2007; 23(4): 420−7.

Published
2020/11/17
Section
Original Paper