Dental arch monitoring by splines fitting error during orthodontic treatment using 3D digital models
Abstract
Abstract
Backrgound/Aim. Researchers in the field of dentistry have been conducting research into modelling and defining dental arches equitations. Nowadays, when 3D digital modelling is commonly utilized in dentistry, the approach to modelling, analysis and synthesis has changed. Clinical researches are related to aesthetic and functional analysis. The aim of this study was to increase repeatability and accuracy of defining and determining the coordinate system of the jaw as well as to defining mathematical criteria for monitoring and evaluating orthodontic treatment. Methods. In this study, we used the plaster models of the jaw, optical scanner with structured light, 3D digital models, computer aided design (CAD) engineering tools adjusting the coordinate system, spline fitting of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th degrees. Results. Splines of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th degrees were fitted from the initial state (K0) in all 10 successive controls (K1, K2, K3,…, K10). All splines were fitted through 12 points, from the right to the left side of the jaw: 6-5-4-3-2-1-1-2-3-4-5-6. Tabular and graphic presentations of the maximum and average deviation of dental arch fitting curves in successive controls were given. Conclusion. The parameters of the maximum and average errors of fitting curves converge the dental arch values that are lower than the accuracy of the used optical scanners. The average error of fitting provides a general picture of the entire dental arch at each stage of treatment. Maximum error fitting points at a specified tooth where the largest deviation.
References
REFERENCES
Majstorović N. Monitoring of teeth nivelation based on 3D digital models. [dissertation]. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Dentistry; 2016. (Serbian)
Majstorović N, Živković S, Glišić B. The advanced model defini-tion and analysis of orthodontic parameters on 3D digital models. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2017; 145(1–2): 49–57.
Ball RL, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138(1): 41–50.
Andrews LF, Andrews WA. The six elements of orofacial har-mony. Andrews J 2000; 1(1): 13–22.
Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis K. Evaluation of the Validity of Tooth Size and Arch Width Measurements Using Conven-tional and Three-dimensional Virtual Orthodontic Models. Angle Orthod 2008; 73(3): 301–6.
Adaškevičius R, Vasiliauskas A. Evaluation of Dental Arch Form Using 3D Dental Cast Scanning Technology. JEEE Med Technol 2009; 93(5): 99–103.
Park KH, Bayome M, Park JH, Lee JW, Baek SH, Kook YA. New classification of lingual arch form in normal occlusion using three dimensional virtual models. Korean J Orthod 2015; 45(2): 74–81.
Slaj M, Spalj S, Jelusic D, Slaj M. Discriminant factor analysis of dental arch dimensions with 3-dimensional virtual models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140(5): 680–7.
Park TJ, Lee SH, Lee KS. A method for mandibular dental arch superimposition using 3D cone beam CT and orthodontic 3D digital model. Korean J Orthod 2012; 42(4): 169–81.
Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impres-sions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109(2): 121–8.
Burns A, Dowling AH, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ. The reliability of Little's Irregularity Index for the upper dental arch using three dimensional (3D) digital models. J Dent 2014; 42(10): 1320–6.
Kook YA, Bayome M, Park SB, Cha BK, Lee YW, Baek SH. Overjet at the anterior and posterior segments: three-dimensional analysis of arch coordination. Angle Orthod 2009; 79(3): 495–501.
AlHarbi S, Alkofide EA, AlMadi A. Mathematical analyses of dental arch curvature in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(2): 281–7.
Noroozi H, Nik TH, Saeeda R. The dental arch form revisited. Angle Orthod 2001; 71(5): 386–9.
Muhamad A, Nezar W, Azzaldeen A. The curve of dental arch in normal occlusion. Open Sci j Clin Med 2015; 3(2): 47–54.
Pokhariyal G. Humans dental arch shapes. GJMR J Dent Oto-laryngol 2015; 15(4): 1–4.
Zhang Y, Jun G, Gang J, Lian S. Motion control point optimization of dental arch generator, Int J Service Sci Technol 2013; 6(5): 49–56.
The American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Digital Model Requirements, Original Release. 04.23.2013. Available from: https://www.americanboardortho.com/ media/1157/abo-digital-model-requirements.pdf, [accessed 2016September 22].
Živković S. Coordinate metrology in manufacturing of the complex spatial forms with applications to the aerodynamic surfaces (in Serbian), monographic series: Scientific-technical information. Belgrade: Military Technical Institute; 2014. (Serbian)
Gavin H. The Levenberg-Marquardt method for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems. Durham: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University; 2016.
ATOS 2016 Manuel for user. Available from:
http://www.gom.com/metrology-systems/atos/atos-triple-
scan.html [accessed July 2016].
Siemens PLM NX10 documentation. Available from: https://docs.plm.automation.siemens.com/ tdoc/nx/10.0.3/nx_help/#uid:index [accessed July 2016].
Majstorović N, Čerče L, Kramar D, Soković M, Glišić B, Majstorović V, et al. Examination of Scanner Precision by Analysing Or-thodontic Parameters. Balk J Dent Med 2017; 21(1): 32–43.
Engineering Modeling of Orthodontics NAtive Geometry (EMONA-G), Common European Research Classification Scheme (CERIF) code: B730; Bilateral Scientific and Techno-logical Cooperation Slovenia-Serbia 2016-2017. Belgrade: Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia; 2017. Available from:
http://www.mpn.gov.rs/odobreni-projekti-sa-slovenijom-
za-period-2016-2017/