Treatment of subacute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty – A case report
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), as a mini-invasive approach in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), provides stabilization of the spine and relives pain. The most commonly it is applied in the 3–6 weeks before bending of the spine. Complete cessation of pain is easier to achieve if you treat “less mature” fractures. The aim of the report is to show that PVP is effective and safe for old fractures too. Case report. A 77-old patient suffered from a stable compression fracture of 3th lumbar (L3) vertebral body after minor trauma. This fracture was clinically and radiologically diagnosed. The conservative treatment that included lumbo-sacral orthosis (LSO), analgesic drugs and physical therapy, was primarily applied due to permanent pain and type of fracture. After a period of two months, pain persisted, but it was localized in a thoracic spinal segment with radiologically diagnosed fractured bodies of 8th (Th8) and 10th (Th10), thoracic vertebra without neurological deficit. Thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis (TLSO) was prescribed and after six months the indication for vertebroplasty of the Th8 and Th10 vertebral body was given. The pain relief had been achieved and the patient was discharged from the Clinic for Orthopedics on the postoperative day 2, and was symptom free during the follow-up period. Conclusion. In patients with stable OVCFs, PVP is an effective therapy for reducing pain and improving mobility of 6 months old fractures.
References
References
Liu L, Cheng S, Lu R, Zhou Q. Extrapedicular Infiltration An-esthesia as an Improved Method of Local Anesthesia for Unipedicular Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Percutane¬ous Kyphoplasty. Bio Med Res Int 2016; 2016: 5086414.
Lamy O, Uebelhart B, Aubry-Rozier B. Risks and benefits of percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in the man-agement of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25(3): 807–19.
Stephenson MB, Glaenzer B, Malamis A. Percutaneous Mini-mally Invasive Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Me-tastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2016; 17(11): 56.
Peh WC, Gilula LA. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: Indica¬tions, contraindications, and technique. Br J Radiol 2003; 76(901): 69–75.
Alexandru D, So W. Evaluation and management of verte¬bral compression fractures. Perm J 2012; 16(4): 46–51.
Röllinghoff M, Zarghooni K, Schlüter-Brust K, Sobottke R, Schlegel U, Eysel P, et al. Indications and contraindications for verte-broplasty and kyphoplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130(6): 765–74.
Dohm M, Black CM, Dacre A, Tillman JB, Fueredi G. A Ran-domized Trial Comparing Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebro-plasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures due to Osteoporo-sis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014; 35(12): 2227–36.
Vanni D, Galzio R, Kazakova A, Pantalone A, Grillea G, Bar¬tolo M, et al. Third-generation percutaneous vertebral augmenta-tion systems. J Spine Surg 2016; 2(1): 13–20.
Anderson PA, Froyshteter AB, Tontz WL Jr. Meta-analysis of vertebral augmentation compared with conservative treatment for osteoporotic spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2013; 28(2): 372–82.
Yokoyama K, Kawanishi M, Yamada M, Tanaka H, Ito Y, Kuroiwa T. Long-term therapeutic effects of vertebroplasty for painful vertebral compression fracture: A retrospective comparative study. Br J Neurosurg 2017; 31(2): 184–8.
Balkarli H, Kilic M, Balkarli A, Erdogan M. An evaluation of the functional and radiological results of percutaneous verte-broplasty versus conservative treatment for acute symptomat-ic osteoporotic spinal fractures. Injury 2016; 47(4): 865–71.
Layton KF, Thielen KR, Koch CA, Luetmer PH, Lane JI, Wald JT, et al. Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: eval-uation of the outcomes and complications. AJNR Am J Neu-roradiol 2007; 28(4): 683–9.
Cheng X, Long HQ, Xu JH, Huang YL, Li FB. Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral com¬pression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2016; 25(11): 3439–49.
Chen D, An ZQ, Song S, Tang JF, Qin H. Percutaneous verte-broplasty compared with conservative treatment in patients with chronic painful osteoporotic spinal fractures. J Clin Neu-rosci 2014; 21(3): 473–7.
Teles AR, Mattei TA, Righesso O, Falavigna A. Controver¬sies on vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for vertebral com¬pression fractures. Coluna/Columna (São Paulo) 2015; 14(4): 324–9.
Takahara K, Kamimura M, Moriya H, Ashizawa R, Koike T, Hidai Y, et al. Risk factors of adjacent vertebral collapse after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic verte¬bral frac-ture in postmenopausal women. BMC Muscu¬loskelet Disord 2016; 17: 12.
Papanastassiou ID, Phillips FM, van Meirhaeghe J, Berenson JR, Andersson GBJ, Chung G, et al. Comparing effects of kypho-plasty, vertebroplasty, and non-surgical manage¬ment in a sys-tematic review of randomized and non-ran¬domized controlled studies. Eur Spine J 2012; 21(9): 1826–4.
Tan HY, Wang LM, Zhao L, Liu YL, Song RP. A prospec¬tive study of percutaneous vertebroplasty for chronic pain¬ful oste-oporotic vertebral compression fracture. Pain Res Manag 2015; 20(1): 8–11.
Brown DB, Gilula LA, Sehgal M, Shimony JS. Treatment of chronic symptomatic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182(2): 319–22.
