Prognostic significance of inflammatory biomarkers in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with STEMI, treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

  • Veljko Milic Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Emergency and Internal Medicine, Belgrade
  • Boris Dzudovic Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Emergency and Internal Medicine, Belgrade
  • Slobodan Obradovic Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Emergency and Internal Medicine, Belgrade ; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade Serbia
Keywords: biomarkers, c-reactive protein, diabetes mellitus, fibrinogen, mortality, percutaneous coronary intervention, prognosis, st elevation myocardial infarction

Abstract


Abstract

 

Background/Aim. Although the prognostic significance of inflammatory biomarkers, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen, in the patients with the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is already known, the specific difference between such patients according to diabetic status remains unknown. Methods. The study was conducted in a single tertiary center. The values of CRP and fibrinogen were measured during the first 48 h in consecutive patients with first STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The patients were divided into two groups: with diabetes and without diabetes. The aim of this study was to determine a prognostic significance of maximal values of these two inflammatory biomarkers for in-hospital and six-month mortality in these two groups. Results. Among 475 patients, 126 (26.5%) were with diabetes and 349 (73.5%) were without diabetes. The patients with diabetes had significantly higher median values of CRP and fibrinogen compared to the nondiabetic patients [29.6 (10.4–91.8) mg/L vs 22.4 (9.79–49.2) mg/L, p = 0.046 and 4.7 (3.6–6.3) g/L vs 4.3 (3.6–5.4) g/L, p = 0.026, respectively]. However, the multivariate survival analysis using the Cox regression model showed that in the nondiabetic STEMI patients CRP and fibrinogen had significant prognostic value for in-hospital mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.013, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.004–1.022), p = 0.004; HR = 1.529 (1.023–2.287), p = 0.039, respectively]. Regarding six-month mortality, no significant difference was achieved. Overall survival was the lowest in the fourth quartile of CRP in the patients without diabetes. Conclusion. The higher values of CRP are the significant independent predictor of in-hospital and overall mortality in the STEMI patients without diabetes treated with primary PCI. Fibrinogen can also be used as an additional prognostic inflammatory biomarker for in-hospital mortality in the non-diabetics with STEMI.

References

REFERENCES

Fang L, Moore XL, Dart AM, Wang LM. Systemic inflammatory response following acute myocardial infarction. J Geriatr Cardiol 2015; 12(3): 305–12.

Di Stefano R, Di Bello V, Barsotti MC, Grigoratos C, Armani C, Dell OM, et al. Inflammatory markers and cardiac function in acute coronary syndrome: difference in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and in non-STEMI models. Biomed Pharmacother 2009; 63(10): 773–80.

Ortolani P, Marzocchi A, Marrozzini C, Palmerini T, Saia F, Taglieri N, et al. Predictive value of high sensitivity C-reactive protein in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2008; 29(10): 1241–9.

Ribeiro DR, Ramos AM, Vieira PL, Menti E, Bordin OL, Souza PA, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a predictor of cardiovascular events after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Arq Bras Cardiol 2014; 103(1): 69–75. (English, Portuguese)

Suleiman M, Khatib R, Agmon Y, Mahamid R, Boulos M, Kapeliovich M, et al. Early inflammation and risk of long-term development of heart failure and mortality in survivors of acute myocardial infarction predictive role of C-reactive protein. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(5): 962–8.

Coppola G, Rizzo M, Abrignani MG, Corrado E, Di Girolamo A, Braschi A, et al. Fibrinogen as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction: A forty-two-month follow-up study. Ital Heart J 2005; 6(4): 315–22.

Cristal N, Slonim A, Bar-Ilan I, Hart A. Plasma fibrinogen levels and the clinical course of acute myocardial infarction. Angiology 1983; 34(11): 693–8.

Sheikh AS, Yahya S, Sheikh NS, Sheikh AA. C-reactive Protein as a Predictor of Adverse outcome in Patients with Acute Co-ronary Syndrome. Heart Views 2012; 13(1): 7–12.

Lontchi-Yimagou E, Sobngwi E, Matsha TE, Kengne AP. Diabetes mellitus and inflammation. Curr Diab Rep 2013; 13(3): 435–44.

Liuzzo G, Buffon A, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Caligiuri G, Vitelli A, et al. Enhanced inflammatory response to coronary angioplasty in patient with severe unstable angina. Circulation 1998; 98(22): 2370–6.

Saleh N, Svane B, Jensen J, Hansson LO, Nordin M, Tornvall P. Stent implantation, but not pathogen burden, is associated with plasma C-reactive protein and interleukin- 6 levels after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable an-gina pectoris. Am Heart J 2005; 149(5): 876–82.

Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, et al. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the Euro-pean Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients pre-senting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(20): 2569–619.

Suleiman M, Aronson D, Reisner SA, Kapeliovich MR, Markiewicz W, Levy Y, et al. Admission C-reactive protein levels and 30-day mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2003; 115(9): 695–701.

Nikfardjam M, Mullner M, Schreiber W, Oschatz E, Exner M, Do-manovits H, et al. The association between C-reactive protein on admission and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Int Med 2000; 247(3): 341–45.

Ziakas A, Gavrilidis S, Giannoglou G, Souliou E, Gemitzis K, Ka-lampalika D, et al. In-hospital and long-term prognostic value of fibrinogen, CRP, and IL-6 levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Angiology 2006; 57(3): 283–93.

Chan D, Ng LL. Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction. BMC Med 2010; 8: 34.

Zairis MN, Adamopoulou EN, Manousakis SJ, Lyras AG, Bibis GP, Ampartzidou OS, et al. The impact of hs C-reactive protein and other inflammatory biomarkers on long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Atherosclerosis 2007; 194(2): 397–402.

O'Loughlin J, Lambert M, Karp I, McGrath J, Gray-Donald K, Barnett TA, et al. Association between cigarette smoking and C-reactive protein in a representative, population-based sample of adolescents. Nicotine Tob Res 2008; 10(3): 525–32.

Lakoski SG, Cushman M, Palmas W, Blumenthal R, D'Agostino RB Jr, Herrington DM. The relationship between blood pressure and C-reactive protein in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(10): 1869–74.

Khera A, McGuire DK, Murphy SA, Stanek HG, Das RS, Vongpatanasin W, et al. Race and Gender Differences in C-Reactive Protein Levels. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 464–9.

Kim KH, Kim W, Kang WY, Hwang SH, Cho SC, Kim W, et al. The Impact of Ischemic Time on the Predictive Value of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated by Primary Percutane-ous Coronary Intervention. Korean Circ J 2013; 43(10): 664–73.

Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, Michel F, Villon L, Cristol J, et al. Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2006; 295(14): 1681–7.

Published
2021/05/11
Section
Original Paper