Frequency and risk factors for injury of the inferior alveolar nerve during surgical extraction of the impacted lower third molars

  • Dejan Dubovina University in Priština/Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oral Surgery, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
  • Stevo Matijevic Military Medical Academy, Clinic of Stomatology, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Filip Djordjevic University in Priština/Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oral Surgery, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
  • Jelena Stanisic University in Priština/Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oral Surgery, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
  • Branko Mihailovic University in Priština/Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oral Surgery, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
  • Zoran Lazic Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Stomatology, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence in Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade
Keywords: molar, third, tooth, impacted, tooth extraction, mandibular nerve, oral surgical procedures, paresthesia

Abstract


Abstract

 

Background/Aim. The injury of inferior alveolar nerve during a surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars, followed by sensory disturbance, is, for the patient, an extremely unpleasant complication. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of this complication after the third molar surgery and its frequency depending on a tooth position and tooth relation to the mandibular canal. Methods. In this study, 800 surgical extractions of the impacted lower third molar were performed. The position of the impacted tooth was recorded according to the Winter classification, as well as the ratio of their root tips to the mandibular canal using the Tanaka et al. and Rood and Shebab classifications. Results. The frequency of the recorded post extraction sensory disturbance was 2.25%, most frequently when teeth were in the mesioangular position. Concerning Tanaka and al. classification, the incidence of injuries was inversely proportional to the increase of distance between roots and mandibular canal with the statistical significance in cases where mandibular canal overlaps more than a half of the root of the tooth (p = 0.001). Considering the radiological signs recommended by Rood and Shehab, a higher frequency of the inferior alveolar nerve injury was recorded when illumination in the area of the root tips was present and when the loss of linear overshadowing characterized by the “roof” and the “bottom” of the mandibular canal were observed, or diversion of the canal and root deflection, but without a statistical significance. Conclusion. The superposition of the mandibular canal with the lower third molar roots at the panoramic radiographies may increase a possibility of the inferior alveolar nerve injury. The angulations of the impacted lower third molar as well as the vicinity of the tips of its roots to the content of the mandibular canal, do not significantly affect the frequency of the nerve injury

Author Biography

Filip Djordjevic, University in Priština/Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Oral Surgery, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia

Teaching assistant

References

REFERENCES

Cade TA. Paresthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve following the extraction of the mandibular third molars: a literature re-view of its causes, treatment, and prognosis. Mil Med 1992; 157(8): 389–92.

Renton T. Prevention of iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve inju-ries in relation to dental procedures. Dent Update 2010; 37(6): 350–2, 354–6, 358–60 passim.

Seo K, Tanaka Y, Terumitsu M, Someya G. Characterization of different paresthesias following orthognathic surgery of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(3): 298–303.

Donoff RB. Surgical management of inferior alveolar nerve injuries (Part I): The case for early repair. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 53(11): 1327–9.

Hillerup S, Jensen R. Nerve injury caused by mandibular block analgesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35(5): 437–43.

Pogrel MA. Complications of third molar surgery. In Kaban LB, Pogrel MA, Perrott DH, editors. Complications of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1997. p. 59–68.

Queral-Godoy E, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Incidence and evolution of inferior alveolar nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2005; 99(3): 259–64.

Gregg JM. Surgical management of inferior alveolar nerve inju-ries (part II): The case for delayed management. J Oral Maxil-lofac Surg 1995; 53(11): 1330–3.

Winter GB. Impacted mandibular third molar. St. Louis: American Medical Book Co.; 1926. p. 241–79.

Tanaka T, Murakami K, Kishida T, Itoh T, Morita Y, Noikura T. Relation between mandibular third molar and mandibular can-al as assessed by three dimensional computed tomography re-construction. J Jpn Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 46(5): 256–61.

Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior al-veolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 28(1): 20–5.

Meshram VS, Meshram PV, Lambade P. Assessment of Nerve Injuries after Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar: A Prospective Study. Asian J Neurosci 2013; 2013: ID 291926.

Robinson PP, Smith KG, Johnson FP, Coppins DA. Equipment and methods for simple sensory testing. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 30(6): 387–9.

Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar nerve: eti-ology, signs and symptoms, and observations on recovery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37(8): 704–9.

Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: The role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44(11): 855–9.

Blondeau F. Paresthésie: Résultat suite à l’extraction de 455 3e molaires incluses mandibulaires. J Can Dent Assoc 1994; 60: 991–4.

Rood JP. Permanent damage to inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during the removal of impacted mandibular third mo-lars. Comparison of two methods of bone removal. Br Dent J 1992; 172(3): 108–10.

Bruce RA, Frederickson GC, Small GS. Age of patients and morbidity associated with mandibular third molar surgery. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 101(2): 240–5.

Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92(4): 377–83.

Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, Nhembe F, Gudka D, Kafas P, et al. Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2010; 109(3): 335–45.

Kipp DP, Goldstein BH, Weiss WW Jr. Dysesthesia after man-dibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study and analysis of 1,377 surgical procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100(2): 185–92.

Selvi F, Dodson TB, Nattestad A, Robertson K, Tolstunov L. Factors that are associated with injury to the inferior alveolar nerve in high-risk patients after removal of third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 51(8): 868–73.

Hasegawa T, Ri S, Shigeta T, Akashi M, Imai Y, Kakei Y, et al. Risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of the mandibular third molar-a comparative study of preoperative images by panoramic radiography and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42(7): 843–51.

Nguyen E, Grubor D, Chandu A. Risk factors for permanent in-jury of inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72(12): 2394–401.

Blaeser BF, August MA, Donoff R, Kaban LB, Dodson TB. Pano-ramic radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve in-jury after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61(4): 417–21.

Garisto GA, Gaffen AS, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC, Haas DA. Occurrence of paresthesia after dental local anesthetic administration in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141(7): 836–44.

Published
2021/07/06
Section
Original Paper