The significance of C-reactive protein for the prediction of net-adverse clinical outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism
Abstract
Background/Aim. Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) may have different clinical manifestations. Also, its outcome can range from complete recovery to early death. Major bleeding (MB) as a due of the therapy also contributes to the overall adverse outcome. So far, it is unknown what the best predictors are for short-term mortality and MB among the several commonly used biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of C-reactive protein (CRP) and other biomarkers for the prediction of adverse clinical outcomes. Methods. This clinical, observational, retrospective-prospective study included 219 consecutive adult patients treated for APE. Results. Among 219 patients, 22 (10%) died within the first month after diagnosis. Twenty seven patients (12.3%) had at least one episode of MB. Composite end-point [net-adverse clinical outcome (NACO)] was estimated in 47 (21.5%) of patients. The average values of all biomarkers were higher in the group of patient who died, and differences were statistically significant. Similar results were obtained for composite end-point. In terms of MB, none of biomarkers did not have significance, but CRP had a slight tendency toward significance. Results from univariate logistic regression model showed that troponin was statistically significant predictor of 30-day mortality. However, after adjusting for other variables, in multivariate logistic regression model troponin failed to be significant independent predictor of 30-day mortality. Unlike troponin, CRP and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were significant in all models – uni and multivariate (they were independent predictors of 30-day mortality). Conclusion. CRP has a good predictive value for 30-day mortality and NACO, and potential for MB in patients treated for APE.
References
Bĕlohlávek J, Dytrych V, Linhart A. Pulmonary embolism. Part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, patho-physiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. Exp Clin Cardiol 2013; 18(2): 129–38.
Chatterjee S, Chakraborty A, Weinberg I, Kadakia M, Wilensky RL, Sardar P, et al. Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2014; 311(23): 2414–21.
El-Habashy MM, Khamis AA, Abdelhady AM. Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in acute pulmonary embolism. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2014; 63(4): 1035–8.
Henzler T, Roeger S, Meyer M, Schoepf UJ, Nance JW, Haghi D, et al. Pulmonary embolism: CT signs and cardiac biomarkers for predicting right ventricular dysfunction. Eur Respir J 2011; 39(4): 919–26.
Demir N, Ekim N, Oguzulgen IK, Bukan N. The Value of Cardi-ac Troponins in Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Pul-monary Embolism. J Pulmon Resp Med 2012; 2: 134.
Weekes AJ, Thacker G, Troha D, Johnson AK, Chanler-Berat J, Norton HJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of right ventricular dys-function markers in normotensive emergency department pa-tients with acute pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 68(3): 277–91.
Ohigashi H, Haraguchi G, Yoshikawa S, Sasaki T, Kimura S, Inagaki H, et al. Comparison of biomarkers for predicting dis-ease severity and long-term respiratory prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Int Heart J 2010; 51(6): 416–20.
Keller K, Beule J, Schulz A, Coldewey M, Dippold W, Balzer JO. D-dimer for risk stratification in haemodynamically stable pa-tients with acute pulmonary embolism. Adv Med Sci 2015; 60(2): 204–10.
Abul Y, Karakurt S, Ozben B, Toprak A, Celikel T. C-reactive protein in acute pulmonary embolism. J Investig Med 2011; 59(1): 8–14.
Koller L, Rothgerber DJ, Sulzgruber P, El-Hamid F, Förster S, Wojta J, et al. History of previous bleeding and C-reactive pro-tein improve assessment of bleeding risk in elderly patients (≥ 80 years) with myocardial infarction. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114(5): 1085–91.
Torbicki A1, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, Agnelli G, Galiè N, Pruszczyk P, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagno-sis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2008; 29(18): 2276–315.
Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galiè N, et al. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Manage-ment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2014; 35(43): 3033–69, 3069a–3069k.
Schulman S, Kearon C. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagu-lation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Defini-tion of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemo-static medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3(4): 692–4.
Mason JC, Libby P. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic inflammation: mechanisms underlying premature car-diovascular events in rheumatologic conditions. Eur Heart J 2015; 36(8): 482–9.
Shrivastava AK, Singh HV, Raizada A, Singh SK. C-reactive protein, inflammation and coronary heart disease. Egypt Heart J 2015; 67(2): 89–97.
Zagorski J, Debelak J, Gellar M, Watts JA, Kline JA. Chemo-kines accumulate in the lungs of rats with severe pulmonary embolism induced by polystyrene microspheres. J Immunol 2003; 171(10): 5529–36.
Zagorski J, Kline JA. Differential effect of mild and severe pulmonary embolism on the rat lung transcriptome. Resp Res 2016; 17(1): 86.
Stewart LK, Nordenholz KE, Courtney M, Kabrhel C, Jones AE, Rondina MT, et al. Comparison of acute and convalescent bi-omarkers of inflammation in patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with systemic fibrinolysis vs. placebo. Blood Coagul Fibrinol 2017; 28(8): 675–80.
Araz O, Yilmazel UE, Yalcin A, Kelercioglu N, Meral M, Gorgun-er AM, et al. Predictive value of serum Hs-CRP levels for outcomes of pulmonary embolism. Clin Respir J 2014; 10(2): 163–7.
Cocoi AF, Pop D, Cocoi M, Serban AM, Vida-Simiti LA. In-volvement of inflammatory markers in pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism. Rev Rom Med Lab 2017; 25(3): 227–36.
Polo Friz H, Corno V, Orenti A, Buzzini C, Crivellari C, Petri F, et al. Comorbidity assessment as predictor of short and long-term mortality in elderly patients with hemodynamically stable acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2017; 44(3): 316–23.
Gjonbrataj E, Kim JN, Gjonbrataj J, Jung HI, Kim HJ, Choi W. Risk factors associated with provoked pulmonary embolism. Korean J Intern Med 2017; 32(1): 95–101.
Kilic T, Gunen H, Gulbas G, Hacievliyagil SS, Ozer A. Prognostic role of simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and the European Society of Cardiology Prognostic Model in short- and long-term risk stratification in pulmonary embo-lism. Pak J Med Sci 2014; 30(6): 1259–64.
Mizuno A, Yamamoto T, Tanabe Y, Obayashi T, Takayama M, Nagao K. Pulmonary embolism severity index and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index risk scores are useful to predict mortality in Japanese patients with pulmonary embo-lism. Circ J 2015; 79(4): 889–91.
Youssef AI, ElShahat HM, Radwan AS, Al-Sadek ME. Compari-son of two prognostic models for acute pulmonary embolism. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2016; 65(4): 771–9.