Nasal polyposis: a semiquantitative morphometric histopathological study

  • Aleksandar Trivić Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nada Tomanović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Sanja Krejović Trivic Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Jovica Milovanović Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ivan Boričić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ana Jotić Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Miljan Folić Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Ivana Ćolović Čalovski University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nikola Miković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Dentistry, Clinic for Maxillofacial Surgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Zoran Tatić Military Medical Academy, Dental Clinic, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: nasal polyps, otorhinolaryngologic surgical procedures, postoperative complications, histology

Abstract


Background/Aim. Nasal polyps are inflammatory hyper­trophic proliferations of the sinonasal mucosa composed of both epithelial and stromal elements. The aim of this study was to determine histopathological hallmarks of nasal poly­posis via semiquantitative morphometric study. Methods. The study comprised 77 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) that underwent functional endoscopic sinonasal surgery performed by the same sur­geon. The control group consisted of 9 different nasal mu­cosal samples that were taken from patients without CRSwNP that underwent functional and esthetic surgery. Morphometric analysis included gradation of tissue edema within polyps, thickening of epithelial basal membrane, de­gree of inflammation, presence/absence of metaplasia within epithelium, degree of fibrosis within polyps, and per­centage of inflammatory cells within inflammatory infiltrate (lymphocytes, macrophages, plasma cells, neutrophils and eosinophils). Results. As expected, samples from the study group showed significantly higher degree of inflammation than samples from the control group (χ2 = 35.89, with p < 0.01). Degree of fibrosis in nasal polyposis was in positive correlation with duration of symptoms (r = 0.25, p < 0.05) and with percentage of macrophages in inflammatory infil­trate (r = 0.26, p < 0.05). Patients with nasal polyposis had significantly lower number of lymphocytes (r = -7.66, p < 0.01), but significantly higher number of eosinophils (r = 3.84, p < 0.01), macrophages (r = 3.34, p < 0.01) and plasma cells (r = 3.14, p < 0.01) than controls (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Tissue samples from patients with nasal polyposis show significant changes that reflect in various degrees of inflammation, fibrosis and basement membrane thickening which may contribute to more difficult surgical management and perioperative complications such as bleeding.

References

Prasad ML, Perez-Ordonez B. Nonsquamous Lesions of the Na-sal Cavity, Paranasal Sinuses, and Nasopharynx. In: Gnepp DR, editor. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology of the Head and Neck. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009; p. 112–4.

Jankowski R. Eosinophils in the pathophysiology of nasal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116(2): 160–3.

Edward JA, Sanyal M, Le W, Soudry E, Ramakrishnan VR, Bravo DT, et al. Selective expansion of human regulatory T cells in nasal polyps, and not in adjacent tissue microenvironments in individual patients exposed to steroids. Clin Immunol 2017; 179: 66–76.

Petruson B, Hansson HA, Petruson K. Insulin-like growth factor I is a possible pathogenic mechanism in nasal polyps. Acta Oto-laryngol (Stockh) 1988; 106(1–2): 156–60.

Alun-Jones T, Hill J, Leighton SE, Morissey MS. Is routine histo-logical examination of nasal polyps justified? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1990; 15(3): 217–9.

Diamantopoulos II, Jones NS, Lowe J. All nasal polyps need histo-logical examination: an audit-based appraisal od clinical prac-tice. J Laryngol Otol 2000; 114(10): 755–9.

Kale SU, Mohite U, Rowlands D, Drake-Lee AB. Clinical and histopathological correlation od nasal polyps: are there any surprises? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001; 26(4): 321–3.

Andrade GC, Fujise LH, Fernandes AM, Azoubel R. Rhinosi-nusal Polyposis and Inverted Papilloma: A Morphometric Comparative Study. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 19(3): 196–9.

Brescia G, Marioni G, Franchella S, Ramacciotti G, Giacomelli L, Marino F,et al. A prospective investigation of predictive pa-rameters for post-surgical recurrences in sinonasal polyposis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273(3): 655–60.

Hirschberg A, Kiss M, Kadocsa E, Polyanka H, Szabo K, Razga Z, et al. Different activations of toll-like receptors and antimi-crobial peptides in chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 273(7): 1779–88.

Azizzadeh Delshad A, Jalali Nadoushan M, Davati A, Rostami A. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Nasal Polyp and Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Iran J Pathol 2016; 11(3): 231–7.

Tezer I, Celebi Erdivanli O, Sanli A, Aydin S. Could cellular proliferation be a predictive index for the relapse of nasal pol-yposis and down-regulated by nasal steroid treatment? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 65(Suppl 2): 329–32.

Nakayama T, Yoshikawa M, Asaka D, Okushi T, Matsuwaki Y, Otori N, et al. Mucosal eosinophilia and recurrence of nasal polyps – new classification of chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinolo-gy 2011; 49(4): 392–6.

Vlaminck S, Vauterin T, Hellings PW, Jorissen M, Acke F, Van Cauwenberge P,et al. The importance of local eosinophilia in the surgical outcome of chronic rhinosinusitis: a 3-year prospec-tive observational study. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014; 28(3): 260–4.

Banks CA, Schlosser RJ, Wang EW, Casey SE, Mulligan RM, Mulligan JK. Macrophage Infiltrate Is Elevated in CRSwNP Sinonasal Tissue Regardless of Atopic Status. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 151(2): 215–20.

Published
2021/04/08
Section
Original Paper