Cone-beam computed tomography study of tooth root and canal morphology of permanent molars in a Serbian population
Abstract
Background/Aim. For successful endodontic therapy, it is necessary to know root morphology. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze root canal morphology and root canal length of permanent molars in a Serbian population, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods. The study included a total of 305 maxillary molars, and 280 mandibular molars receiving cone-beam computed tomography examination and determined root numbers, canal morphology according to Vertucci classification, and canal lengths. Results were correlated with sex and tooth location in the jaw. Results. The mesiobuccal roots of first maxillary molars showed Vertucci type I in 45.7%, followed by type II in 29% of cases. For the second molar, Vertucci type I was found in 60.5% of cases in mesiobuccal canals. Palatal and distobuccal canals mostly presented Vertucci type I configuration. The mesial roots of mandibular molars had the highest frequency of two canals with Vertucci type IV as the most frequent for the first molar, and Vertucci type II for the second molar. Distal roots most commonly had one canal in both molars. Palatal canal length was the highest in maxillary first molars, with the mean value of 20.62 mm, while in second molars, the highest length value was for the mesiobuccal canal (20.09 mm). In both mandibular molars the mesial root canal was the longest one. Differences were found according to sex and tooth location in the jaw. Conclusion. Mesiobuccal roots of maxillary first molars had two canals; it was more frequently compared to second molars. Mesial roots of mandibular molars showed same frequency of two canals, and diversity in Vertucci types. Male patients tended to have higher complexity of root canal morphology compared to that of females. CBCT can improve understanding of the root canal morphology.
References
Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58(5): 589‒99.
Plotino G, Tocci L, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Messineo D, Ciotti M, et al. Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of maxi¬llary and mandibular molars in a white population: a cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo. J Endod 2013; 39(12): 1545‒8.
Beljić-Ivanović K, Teodorović N. Morphological characteristics of mesiobuccal root canals of the first maxillary molars. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2010; 138(7‒8): 414‒9. (Serbian)
Gulabivala K, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Alavi A. Root and canal morphology of Thai mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35(1): 56‒62.
Tchorz JP, Poxleitner PJ, Stampf S, Patzelt SBM, Rottke D, Hellwig E, et al. The use of cone beam computed tomography to predetermine root canal lengths in molar teeth: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional measure-ments. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18(4): 1129‒33.
Jeger FB, Janner SF, Bornstein MM, Lussi A. Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a prospective, controlled clinical study. J Endod 2012; 38(7): 884‒8.
de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix Sánchez M, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent man-dibular first molar: a systematic review. J Endod 2010; 36(12): 1919‒31.
Ratanajirasut R, Panichuttra A, Panmekiate S. A Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study of Root and Canal Morpho-logy of Maxillary First and Second Permanent Molars in a Thai Population. J Endod 2018; 44(1): 56‒61.
Cleghorn BM, Christie WH, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: a literature review. J Endod 2006; 32(9): 813‒21.
Gulabivala K, Aung TH, Alavi A, Ng YL. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. Int Endod J 2001; 34(5): 359‒70.
Rajan Dhawan M, Dhawan S, Mehta P. Analysis of Root Canal Anatomy & Morphological Variations of Maxillary 1st Molar by Different Methods - An In Vitro Study. Endodontology 2014; 26(2): 279‒85.
de Toubes KM, Côrtes MI, Valadares MA, Fonseca LC, Nunes E, Silveira FF. Comparative analysis of accessory mesial canal identification in mandibular first molars by using four different diagnostic methods. J Endod 2012; 38(4): 436‒41.
Popović M, Papić M, Živanović S, Acović A, Lončarević S, Ristić V. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal mor-phology of mandibular anterior teeth in Serbian popu¬lation. SJECR Serb Exp Clin Res 2018; 19(1): 27‒34.
Popović M, Papić M, Acović A, Živanović S, Kanjevac T. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study of Root Number and Root Canal Configuration of Premolar Teeth in Serbian population. Med Pregl 2018; 71(3‒4): 100‒7.
Hatcher DC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141 Suppl 3: 3S‒6S.
Nikolić M, Mitić A, Gašić J, Popović J, Barac R, Dačić S, et al. First premolar variations in number of roots, root canals and tooth length. Glasnik Antropološkog Društva Srbije 2014; 2014(49): 37‒41.
Thomas RP, Moule A, Bryant R. Root canal morphology of maxillary permanent first molar teeth at various ages. Int En-dod J 1993; 26(5): 257‒67.
Ghoncheh Z, Zade BM, Kharazifard MJ. Root Morphology of the Maxillary First and Second Molars in an Iranian Population Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Dent (Tehran) 2017; 14(3): 115‒22.
Alrahabi M, Sohail Zafar M. Evaluation of root canal morpho-logy of maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomo-graphy. Pak J Med Sci 2015; 31(2): 426‒30.
Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod 2004; 30(9): 668‒71.
Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Cantekin K, Aydinbelge M, Dogan S. Eva-luation of root canal morphology of human primary molars by using CBCT and comprehensive review of the literature. Acta Odontol Scand 2016; 74(4): 250‒8.
Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S. Clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars. J Endod 2002; 28(6): 477‒9.
Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod 2012; 38(8): 1063‒8.
Pérez-Heredia M, Ferrer-Luque CM, Bravo M, Castelo-Baz P, Ruíz-Piñón M, Baca P. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study of Root Anatomy and Canal Configuration of Molars in a Spanish Population. J Endod 2017; 43(9): 1511‒6.
Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J. Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J 2004; 37(7): 494‒9.
Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Abuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutman JI. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary First and Second Molar in an Indian Population. J Endod 2010; 36(10): 1622‒7.
Torres A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, Brizuela C, Cabrera C, Concha G, et al. Characterization of mandibular molar root and canal morphology using cone beam computed tomography and its variability in Belgian and Chilean population samples. Imaging Sci Dent 2015; 45(2): 95‒101.
Kim SY, Kim BS, Woo J, Kim Y. Morphology of mandibular first molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a Korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals. J Endod 2013; 39(12): 1516‒21.
Rwenyonyi CM, Kutesa A, Muwazi LM, Buwembo W. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second permanent molar teeth in a Ugandan population. Odontology 2009; 97(2): 92‒6.
Liang YH, Jiang L, Chen C, Gao XJ, Wesselink PR, Wu MK, et al. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measu¬ring root canal length using a gold standard. J Endod 2013; 39(12): 1607‒10.
Rodríguez-Niklitschek C, Cantín M, Oporto VG. Comparison of Two Different Methods of Average Working Length Deter-mination in Second Molars and Premolars. Int J Morphol [online] 2015; 33(3): 1136‒40.
Keleş P, Díyarbakirli S, Tan M, Tan U. Facial asymmetry in right- and left-handed men and women. Int J Neurosci 1997; 91(3‒4): 147‒59.
