Influence of chorionicity on healthy twin pregnancy outcome
Abstract
Background/Aim. It is still under debate in what sense and extent can chorionicity impact the pregnancy outcome of twins without gestational complications specific for monochorionicity. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of chorionicity on healthy twin pregnancy outcome. Methods. The study included patients with uncomplicated twin pregnancies after first trimester that were checked-up and delivered at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade during three years (2010–2013). Data regarding mother’s age, comorbidities, parity, presence and type of gestational complications, chorionicity, mode and time of pregnancy ending, birth-weight and Apgar score of twins were determined. Obtained data were compared and statistically analyzed. Results. The study included 361 women with mean age of 33 years. Regardless of chorionicity, twins were mostly born during the 36th gestational week and received Apgar score ≥ 8. Only three monochorionic twins were stillborn, two preterm (29 and 32 gestational week) and one in term (35 gestational week) delivery. Contrary, no intrauterine fetal deaths were recorded. Monochorionicity negatively correlated with having live-born twins (OR = 0.023; CI = [0.001–0.609]; p = 0.024), but was not associated with twins condition at birth, i.e. Apgar score (p = 0.345), pregnancy ending time (p = 0.578) or any other twins characteristic. However, premature preterm membrane rupture and earlier gestational week of pregnancy ending were important confounding factors for relationship between chorionicity and pregnancy outcome. Conclusion. Monochorionicity increases risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes even for uncomplicated, healthy twin pregnancy, but has no influence on the condition of twins who survive until term. If appropriate surveillance and therapy are applied, both healthy twins can be delivered at term regardless of chorionicity.
References
Kawamura H, Ishii K, Yonetani N, Mabuchi A, Hayashi S, Mitsuda N. Significance of chorionicity on long-term outcome of low birthweight infants of <1500g in twin pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41(8): 1185–92.
Oldenburg A, Rode L, Bodker B, Ersbak V, Holmskov A, Jørgen-sen FS, et al. Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39(1): 69–74.
Lewi L, Gucciardo L, Van Mieghem T, de Koninck P, Beck V, Medek H, et al. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: natural history and risk stratification. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27(1): 121–33.
Masheer S, Maheen H, Munim S. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28(1): 23–5.
Dias T, Arcangeli T, Bhide A, Napolitano R, Mahsud-Dornan S, Thilaganathan B. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38(5): 530–2.
Oger AS, Robillard PY, Barau G, Randrianaivo H, Bonsante F, Iacobelli S, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic and di-chorionic twin gestations: a study of 775 pregnancies at Reun-ion Island. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2013; 42(7): 655–61. (French)
Glinianaia SV, Obeysekera MA, Sturgiss S, Bell R. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study. Hum Reprod 2011; 26(9): 2549–57.
McPherson JA, Odibo AO, Shanks AL, Roehl KA, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Impact of chorionicity on risk and timing of intra-uterine fetal demise in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207(3): 190.e1–6.
Morikawa M, Yamada T, Yamada T, Sato S, Cho K, Minakami H. Prospective risk of stillbirth: monochorionic diamniotic twins vs. dichorionic twins. J Perinat Med 2012; 40(3): 245–9.
Van Steenis A, Kromhout HE, Steggerda SJ, Sueters M, Rijken M, Oepkes D, et al. Perinatal Asphyxia in Monochorionic versus Dichorionic Twins: Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcome. Fe-tal Diagn Ther 2014; 35(2): 87–91.
Vergani P, Russo FM, Follesa I, Cozzolino S, Fedeli T, Ventura L, et al. Perinatal complications in twin pregnancies after 34 weeks: effects of gestational age at delivery and chorionicity. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(7): 545–50.
Weiner E, Barber E, Feldstein O, Dekalo A, Schreiber L, Bar J, et al Placental Histopathology Differences and Neona-tal Outcome in Dichorionic-Diamniotic as Compared to Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies. Reprod Sci 2018; 25(7): 1067–72.
Burgess JL, Unal ER, Nietert PJ, Newman RB. Risk of late-preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210(6): 578.e1–9.
Al Riyami N, Al-Rusheidi A, Al-Khabori M. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic in comparison to dichorionic twin preg-nancies. Oman Med J 2013; 28(3): 173–7.
Assunção RA, Liao AW, Brizot Mde L, Krebs VL, Zugaib M. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies delivered in a teaching hospital. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2010; 56(4): 447–51.
Kristiansen MK, Joensen BS, Ekelund CK, Petersen OB, Sandager P, Danish Fetal Medicine Study Group. Perinatal outcome after first-trimester risk assessment in monochorionic and dichori-onic twin pregnancies: a population-based register study. BJOG. 2015; 122(10): 1362–9.
Breathnach FM, McAuliffe FM, Geary M, Daly S, Higgins JR, Dornan J, et al. Optimum timing for planned delivery of un-complicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119(1): 50–9.
Manso P, Vaz A, Taborda A, Silva IS. Chorionicity and perina-tal complications in twin pregnancy: a 10 years case series. Ac-ta Med Port 2011; 24(5): 695–8.
Quintana E, Burgos J, Eguiguren N, Melchor JC, Fernandez-Llebrez L, Martinez-Astorquiza T. Influence of chorionicity in intra-partum management of twin deliveries. J Matern Fetal Neona-tal Med 2013; 26(4): 407–11.