Chronic rhinitis in glassblowers
Abstract
Background/Aim. Glassworkers, especially glassblowers are in close contact with a variety of chemical and physical harmful agents at their workplace. Upper aerodigestive pathway is predominantly vulnerable to these agents. Breathing of warm volatile substances and dust, and mouth touch with glassblower's pipe are the main ways for chronic respiratory mucosa inflammation. The aim of this study was to estimate effect of workplace environment in a glass manufacturer plant, as a causative factor, on the prevalence of chronic rhinitis in glassblowers. Methods. Studied groups, one hundred glassblowers and 100 nonglassblowers in a same factory, were examined for diagnosis of chronic rhinitis. Results. This investigation confirmed that chronic rhinitis prevalence among glassblowers was significantly higher than that in non-glassblowers. The duration of exposure to harmful factors was not a significant factor for chronic rhinitis development. Conclusion. On their workplace, glassblowers are exposed to greater influence of noxious factors, and they have statistically greater risk for getting chronic rhinitis than nonglassblowers who work in the same work environment. Glass production by glassblowing is highly significant risk factor for getting chronic rhinitis, but the exposure period is not.Background/Aim. Glassworkers, especially glassblowers are in close contact with a variety of chemical and physical harmful agents at their workplace. Upper aerodigestive pathway is predominantly vulnerable to these agents. Breathing of warm volatile substances and dust, and mouth touch with glassblower's pipe are the main ways for chronic respiratory mucosa inflammation. The aim of this study was to estimate effect of workplace environment in a glass manufacturer plant, as a causative factor, on the prevalence of chronic rhinitis in glassblowers. Methods. Studied groups, one hundred glassblowers and 100 nonglassblowers in a same factory, were examined for diagnosis of chronic rhinitis. Results. This investigation confirmed that chronic rhinitis prevalence among glassblowers was significantly higher than that in non-glassblowers. The duration of exposure to harmful factors was not a significant factor for chronic rhinitis development. Conclusion. On their workplace, glassblowers are exposed to greater influence of noxious factors, and they have statistically greater risk for getting chronic rhinitis than nonglassblowers who work in the same work environment. Glass production by glassblowing is highly significant risk factor for getting chronic rhinitis, but the exposure period is not.
References
Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, et al. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinol-ogy: Allergic Rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018; 8(2): 108‒352.
Stevens WW, Grammer LC 3rd. Occupational rhinitis: an up-date. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2015; 15(1): 487.
Yoruk O, Ates O, Araz O, Aktan B, Alper F, Sutbeyaz Y, et al. The effects of silica exposure on upper airways and eyes in denim sandblasters. Rhinology 2008; 46(4): 328‒33.
Lacroix JS, Landis BN. Neurogenic inflammation of the upper airway mucosa. Rhinology2008; 46(3): 163‒5.
Eifan AO, Durham SR. Pathogenesis of rhinitis. Clin Exp Al-lergy 2016; 46(9): 1139‒51.
Hisinger-Mölkänen H, Piirilä P, Haahtela T, Sovijärvi A, Pallasaho P. Smoking, environmental tobacco smoke and occupational irritants increase the risk of chronic rhinitis. World Allergy Organ J. 2018; 14; 11(1): 6.
Andersson L, Wingren G, Axelson O. Some hygienic observa-tions from the glass industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1990; 62(3): 249‒52.
Raithel HJ, Mayer P, Schaller KH, Mohrmann W, Weltle D, Val-entin H. Exposure to nickel of workers in the glass industry. I. Analysis and quantification of external and internal nickel load]. Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Prophyl Ergonomie 1981; 31(8): 332‒9. (German)
World Health Organization. International Agency for Re-search on Cancer. IARC Monographs. Nickel and nickel com-pounds. 2018. Available from: https://monographs.iarc.fr/ wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono100C-10.pdf
Kim J, Seo S, Kim Y, Kim DH. Review of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chrome and proposal of revising approval stand-ards for an occupational cancers in Korea. Ann Occup Envi-ron Med 2018; 30: 7.
Szmeja Z, Kończewska H, Woźniak A, Masternak M, Grzymisławski M. Condition of the upper respiratory tract and various biochemical indicators in the employees of glass works plants exposed to occupational dust. Med Pr 1983; 34(2): 177‒82. (Polish)
Hasin DS, Grant BF. The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) Waves 1 and 2: review and summary of findings. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Ep-idemiol 2015; 50(11): 1609‒40.
Van Gerven L, Boeckxstaens G, Hellings PW. Up-date on neuro-immune mechanisms involved in allergic and non-allergic rhi-nitis. Rhinology 2012; 50(3): 227‒35.
Scadding G, Hellings PW, Alobid I, Bachert C, Fokkens WJ, van Wijk RG, et al. Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI posi-tion paper. Clin Transl Allergy 2011; 1(1): 2.
Perić A, Vojvodić D, Vukomanović-Đurđević B, Baletić N. Eosino-philic inflammation in allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2011; 62(4): 341‒8.
De Corso E, Baroni S, Romitelli F, Luca L, Di Nardo W, Passali GC, et al. Nasal lavage CCL24 levels correlate with eosinophil trafficking and symptoms in chronic sino-nasal eosinophilic in-flammation. Rhinology 2011; 49(2): 174‒9.