Evaluation of the anticoagulant effect of vitamin K antagonists in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrilation

  • Zoran Stanojković Blood Transfusion Institute Niš, Medical Faculty, University of Niš
  • Ana Antić Blood Transfusion Institute of Niš
  • Bela Balint Department of Medical Sciences, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts; Department of Transfusion Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje"; Institute of Medical Research, University of Belgrade
  • Milena Todorović Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade; Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade
  • Miodrag Vučić Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center Niš; Medical Faculty, University of Niš
  • Nebojša Vacić Clinic for Hematology, Clinical Center Niš;
  • Milan Lazarević Clinic for Cardiovascular and Transplant Surgery, Clinical center Niš
Keywords: anticoagulants;, atrial fibrillation;, blood coagulation tests;, dose-response relationship, drug;, vitamin k

Abstract


Background/Aim. Despite the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivoroxaban, apixaban), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), such as warfarin and acenocoumarol are still the most widely used oral anticoagulants for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The time in therapeutic range (TTR) represents a measure of the quality of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs, and it is considered that the lower value of TTR is associated with the adverse effects of therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate of the effectiveness of VKA therapy in patients with NVAF and to identify factors affecting the anticoagulation efficacy. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on a population of 725 outpatients with NVAF, treated with VKA and followed in the Blood Transfusion Institute of Niš, Serbia, from January to December 2017. Laboratory control of the INR was done from capillary blood of patients on Thrombotrack Solo (Axis Shield, Norway) and Thrombostat (Behnk Elektronik, Germany). Targeted therapeutic INR was between 2.0 and 3.0. For each patient all available INR values were evaluated to calculate the individual TTR according to the Rosendaal method. Results. The study included a total of 725 patients with NVAF which had 6,105 INR measurements, what was 8.13 ± 2.47 INR measurements per patient. The mean value of TTR and was 60.15 ± 17.52%, but 49.72% of patients had TTR less than 60%. Patients were at high risk of thrombosis in 6.15% of time (INR < 1.5) and high risk of bleeding in 2.2% of time (INR > 4.5). The most significant independent factors affecting the quality of VKA therapy were gender, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and the use of amiodarone and antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel). Conclusion. The TTR is undoubtedly useful indicator of the VKA treatment effectiveness. The most important predictors of poorer efficacy of VKA therapy are: arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, patients' gender and the use of amiodarone and antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel). To improve the quality of VKA therapy, education of patients and better collaboration with them, as well as a successful teamwork of clinicians are also imperative.

References

Ciurus T, Cichocka-Radwan A, Lelonek M. Factors affecting the quality of anticoagulation with warfarin: experience of one cardiac centre. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2015; 12(4): 334‒40.

Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnlos-er SH, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the manage-ment of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guide-lines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Asso-ciation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(21): 2719‒47.

Baklaja R. Oral anticoagulant therapy. In: Baklaja R, Elezović I, editors. Laboratory diagnosis of haemostasis disturbances. Be-ograd: Interlab exim 2008. p. 100–9. (Serbian)

Witt DM, Clark NP, Kaatz S, Schnurr T, Ansell JE. Guidance for the practical management of warfarin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombo-lysis 2016; 41(1): 187‒205.

Tideman PA, Tirimacco R, St John A, Roberts GW. How to man-age warfarin therapy. Aust Prescr 2015; 38(2): 44‒8.

Farsad BF, Abbasinazari M, Dabagh A, Bakshandeh H. Evalua-tion of Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Treatment with Warfarin in Tehran, Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Di-agn Res 2016; 10(9): FC04‒FC06.

Gallego P, Vilchez JA, Lane DA. Apixaban compared with war-farin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: implications of time in therapeutic range. Circulation 2013; 127(22): 2163‒5.

Gateman D, Trojnar ME, Agarwal G. Time in therapeutic range: Warfarin anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in a communi-ty-based practice. Can Fam Physician 2017; 63(10): e425‒31.

Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, Flaker G, Commerford P, Franzosi MG, et al. ACTIVE W Investigators. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation de-pends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in ther-apeutic range. Circulation 2008; 118(20): 2029‒37.

Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, Alings M, Flather M, Franzosi MG, et al. RE-LY investigators. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of in-ternational normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet 2010; 376(9745): 975‒83.

Avezum A, de Figueiredo Oliveira GB, Diaz R, Gonzalez Hermo-sillo JA, Oldgren J, Ripoll EF, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin from the RE-LY trial. Open Heart 2018; 5(1): e000800.

Thrombosis Canada. Warfarin: management of out-of-range INRs. Whitby, ON: Thrombosis Canada; 2015. Available from: http://thrombosiscanada.ca/clinicalguides/#. [accessed 2016 January 8].

Wieloch M, Själander A, Frykman V, Rosenqvist M, Eriksson N, Svensson PJ. Anticoagulation control in Sweden: reports of time in therapeutic range, major bleeding, and thrombo-embolic complications from the national quality registry Au-riculA. Eur Heart J 2011; 32(18): 2282‒9.

Apostolakis S, Sullivan RM, Olshansky B, Lip GYH. Factors af-fecting quality of anticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin: the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score. Chest 2013; 144(5): 1555‒63.

Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, Briët E. A meth-od to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69(3): 236‒9.

Keeling D, Baglin T, Tait C, Watson H, Perry D, Baglin C, et al. British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on oral anticoagulation with warfarin - fourth edition. Br J Haematol 2011; 154(3): 311‒24.

Andersen LV, Vestergaard P, Deichgraeber P, Lindholt JS, Morten-sen LS, Frost L. Warfarin for the prevention of systemic em-bolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Heart 2008; 94(12): 1607‒13.

Amin A. Oral anticoagulation to reduce risk of stroke in pa-tients with atrial fibrillation: current and future therapies. Clin Interv Aging 2013; 8: 75‒84.

Steiner T, Weitz JI, Veltkamp R. Anticoagulant-Associated In-tracranial Hemorrhage in the Era of Reversal Agents. Stroke 2017; 48(5): 1432‒7.

Singer DE, Hellkamp AS, Piccini JP, Mahaffey KW, Lokhnygina Y, Pan G, et al. ROCKET AF Investigators. Impact of global ge-ographic region on time in therapeutic range on warfarin anti-coagulant therapy: data from the ROCKET AF clinical trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2013; 2(1): e000067.

Wallentin L, Lopes RD, Hanna M, Thomas L, Hellkamp A, Ne-pal S, et al. Apixaban for wReduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) Investigators. Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin at different levels of predicted international normal-ized ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2013; 127(22): 2166‒76.

McDonald MG, Au NT, Wittkowsky AK, Rettie AE. Warfarin-amiodarone drug-drug interactions: determination of [I](u)/K(I,u) for amiodarone and its plasma metabolites. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012; 91(4): 709‒17.

Holm J, Lindh JD, Andersson ML, Mannheimer B. The effect of amiodarone on warfarin anticoagulation: a register-based na-tionwide cohort study involving the Swedish population. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15(3): 446‒53.

Sarafoff N, Martischnig A, Wealer J, Mayer K, Mehilli J, Sibbing D, et al. Triple therapy with aspirin, prasugrel, and vitamin K antagonists in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation and an indication for oral anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61(20): 2060‒6.

Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ. Management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute coronary syndromes or percutaneous coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7(1): 113‒24.

Sørensen R, Hansen ML, Abildstrom SZ, Hvelplund A, Andersson C, Jørgensen C, et al. Risk of bleeding in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with different combinations of aspirin, clopidogrel, and vitamin K antagonists in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of nationwide registry data. Lancet 2009; 374(9706): 1967‒74.

Antić A, Stanojković Z, Vučić M, Lazarević M, Vacić N. Compari-son of pharmacodynamic properties of three different aspirin formualtions in patients with stable coronary disease. Vojno-sanit Pregl 2018 OnLine-First March (00): 34–34: doi.org/10.2298/VSP180110034A.

Morgan CL, McEwan P, Tukiendorf A, Robinson PA, Clemens A, Plumb JM. Warfarin treatment in patients with atrial fibrilla-tion: observing outcomes associated with varying levels of INR control. Thromb Res 2009; 124(1): 37‒41.

Melamed OC, Horowitz G, Elhayany A, Vinker S. Quality of an-ticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Manag Care 2011; 17(3): 232‒7.

Rose AJ, Hylek EM, Ozonoff A, Ash AS, Reisman JI, Berlowitz DR. Patient characteristics associated with oral anticoagula-tion control: results of the Veterans AffaiRs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA). J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8(10): 2182‒91.

Agarwal S, Bennett D, Smith DJ. Predictors of warfarin use in atrial fibrillation patients in the inpatient setting. Am J Cardi-ovasc Drugs 2010; 10(1): 37‒48.

Nelson WW, Choi JC, Vanderpoel J, Damaraju CV, Wildgoose P, Fields LE, et al. Impact of co-morbidities and patient charac-teristics on international normalized ratio control over time in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2013; 112(4): 509‒12.

Wessels PF. Anticoagulation therapy in diabetic patients. S Afr J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2012; 9(1): 6–7.

Hinojar R, Jimenez-Natcher JJ, Fernández-Golfin C, Zamorano LJ. New oral anticoagulants: a practical guide for physicians. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 2015; 1 (2): 134–45.

Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383(9921): 955‒62.

Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, Hippisley-Cox J. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ 2018; 362: k2505.

Published
2021/01/15
Section
Original Paper