Esophageal two-phase supine/standing scintigraphy and balloon dilatation in achalasia: 20 years of experience

  • Zoran Janković Military Medical Academy, Institute for Nuclear Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragan Pucar Military Medical Academy, Institute for Nuclear Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Radoje Doder University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nenad Perišić University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: balloon dilatation, esophagus, achalasia, prognosis, radionuclide imaging, treatment outcome

Abstract


Background/Aim. The most frequent therapeutic method for achalasia is balloon dilatation (BD). Esophageal scintigraphy is potentially the most convenient method for the evaluation of achalasia by quantifying esophageal transit. The aim of this study was to present the results of esophageal scintigraphy (ES) in achalasia treated by BD for a long period of time, from 1997 to 2016, and to set parameters suitable for predicting treatment outcomes. Methods. Two-phase ES in anterior projection was performed. The first phase involved swallowing 10 mL of water with 18.5 MBq 99mTc in a supine position. The second phase was performed in a standing position after swallowing 100 mL of water. The retention index (RI) of esophageal radioactivity was calculated after the imaging using registered esophageal and gastric counts. ES was performed in 52 patients (34 males and 18 females, aged 22–75 years, the median age 44 years) before and after BD. In 31 patients, only two scintigraphies were performed. In the remaining 21 patients, follow-up and repeated scintigraphies were continued including the patients with therapeutic failure and repeated BD. BD was repeated in 8 patients, and those were followed up and evaluated over time. Modified BD was performed with Rigiflex balloon dilators. Results. A typical scintigraphic finding in the supine position was passive esophageal filling without the evidence of motility, and in most patients, 43 of them (83%), radionuclide elimination in the stomach was absent. Evaluating values before and long after the first BD, it was shown that certain values of RI indicated remission or relapse of the disease. The RI difference higher than 50% after BD was a reliable indicator of a longer remission. The age and gender of patients had no impact on the outcome of dilatation, but younger patients were with a higher risk of early failure (6 patients during the first year after BD). ES showed that the first BD was initially successful in 50 patients and after the follow-up in 41 (79%) patients. Conclusion. A two-phase supine/standing ES is most suitable for diagnosing and the follow-up of achalasia. RI represents an important parameter for the evaluation and prediction of therapeutic response. The RI difference of more than 50% after BD is a reliable predictor of a longer remission. Age and gender have no impact on dilatation outcome, but patients younger than 40 years have a higher risk of early therapeutic failure.

References

Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G. The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manom-etry. Gastroenterology 2013; 145(5): 954–65.

Furuzawa-Carballeda J, Torres-Landa S, Valdovinos MÁ, Coss-Adame E, Martín Del Campo LA, Torres-Villalobos G. New in-sights into the pathophysiology of achalasia and implications for future treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(35): 7892‒907.

Eckardt VF, Gockel I, Bernhard G. Pneumatic dilation for acha-lasia: late results of a prospective follow up investigation. Gut 2004; 53(5): 629–33.

Doder R, Perišić N, Tomašević R, Mirković D, Janković Z, Djordjević Z. Long term outcome of a modified balloon dilata-tion in the treatment of patients with achalasia. Vojnosanit Pregl 2013; 70(10): 915–22.

Jeon HH, Youn YH, Rhee K, Kim JH, Park H, Conklin JL. For

patients with primary achalasia the clinical success of pneu-matic balloon dilatation can be predicted from the residual fraction of radionuclide during esophageal transit scintigraphy. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59(2): 375–82.

Cheng P, Shi H, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Dong J, Cai Y, et al. Clinical effect of endoscopic pneumatic dilation for achalasia. Medi-cine 2015; 94(28): e1193.

Moonen A, Annese V, Belmans A, Bredenord AJ, Bruley des Varannes S, Costantini M, et al. Long-term results of the euro-pean achalasia trial: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myo-tomy. Gut 2016; 65(5): 732–9.

Gupta SJ, Gaikwad NR, Samarth AR, Gattewar SR. Pneumatic balloon dilatation for achalasia cardia: outcome, complica-tions, success, and long-term follow-up. Euroasian J Hepato-gastroenterol 2017; 7(2): 138–41.

Robertson CS, Hardy JG, Atkinson M. Quantitative assessment of the response to therapy in achalasia of the cardia. Gut 1989; 30(6): 768–73.

Parker DR, Swift GL, Adams H, Smith PM, Richards AR. Radi-onuclide esophageal transit studies in achalasia before and af-ter balloon dilatation. Dis Esophagus 1996; 9(1): 42‒5.

Chawda SJ, Watura R, Adams H, Smith PM. A comparison of barium swallow and erect esophageal transit scintigraphy fol-lowing balloon dilatation for achalasia. Dis Esophagus 1998; 11(3): 181–7; discussion 187‒8.

Ehsani Ardakani MJ. Esophageal Transit Scintigraphy, Ma-nometry, and Barium Swallow in Assessment of Response to Balloon Dilatation in Achalasia, Iran J Radiol 2006; 4(1): e79230.

Chung JJ, Park HJ, Yu JS, Hong YJ, Kim JH, Kim MJ, Lee SI. A comparison of esophagography and esophageal transit scintig-raphy in the evaluation of usefulness of endoscopic pneumatic dilatation in achalasia. Acta Radiol 2008; 49(5): 498–505.

Stefanidis D, Richardson W, Farrell TM, Kohn GP, Augenstein V, Fanelli RD. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endo-scopic Surgeons. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(2): 296–311.

Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: di-agnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013; 108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250.

Farhoomand K, Connor JT, Richter JE, Achkar E, Vaezi MF. Pre-dictors of outcome of pneumatic dilation in achalasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2(5): 389–94.

Mehta R, John A, Sadasivan S, Mustafa CP, Nandkumar R, Raj V, et al. Factors determining successful outcome following pneumatic balloon dilatation in achalasia cardia. Indian J Gas-troenterol 2005; 24(6): 243–5.

Dagli U, Kuran S, Savas N, Ozin Y, Alkim C, Atalay F, et al. Factors predicting outcome of balloon dilatation in achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54(6): 1237–42.

Tanaka Y, Iwakiri K, Kawami N, Sano H, Umezava M, Kotoyori M, et al. Predictors of a better outcome of pneumatic dilata-tion in patients with primary achalasia. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45(2): 153–8.

Alderliesten J, Conchillo JM, Leeuwenburgh I, Steyerberg EW, Kui-pers EJ. Predictors for outcome of failure of balloon dilatation in patients with achalasia. Gut 2011; 60(1): 10–6.

Yamashita H, Ashida K, Fukuchi T, Nagatani Y, Koga H, Senda K, et al. Predictive factors associated with the success of pneu-matic dilatation in Japanese patients with primary achalasia: a study using high-resolution manometry. Digestion 2013; 87(1): 23–8.

Neyaz Z, Gupta M, Ghoshal UC. How to perform and interpret timed barium esophagogram. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19(2): 251–6.

Park YM, Jeon HH, Park JJ, Kim JH, Youn YH, Park H. Corre-lation between timed barium esophagogram and esophageal transit scintigraphy results in achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60(8): 2390–7.

Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewitz W, Post J, Kahri-las P. Achalasia: A new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 2008; 135(5): 1526–33.

Roman S, Gyawali CP, Xiao Y, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. The Chicago classification of motility disorders: an update. Gastro-intest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24(4): 545–61.

Rohof WOA, Bredenoord AJ. Chicago classification of esophage-al motility disorders: lessons learned. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017; 19(8): 37.

Müller M, Eckardt AJ, Wehrmann T. Endoscopic approach to achalasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(8): 379–90.

Uppal DS, Wang AJ. Update on the endoscopic treatments for achalasia. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22(39): 8670–83.

Youn YH, Minami H, Chiu PW, Park H. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia and esophageal motility disor-ders. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 22(1): 14–24.

Tuason J, Inoue H. Current status of achalasia management: a review on diagnosis and treatment. J Gastroenterol 2017; 52(4): 401–6.

Arora Z, Thota PN, Sanaka MR. Achalasia: current therapeutic options. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2017; 8(6–7): 101–8.

Baniya R, Upadhaya S, Khan J, Subedi SK, Shaik Mohammed T, Ganatra BK, et al. Laparoscopic esophageal myotomy versus pneumatic dilation in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Exp Gas-troenterol 2017; 10: 241–8.

Published
2021/05/10
Section
Original Paper