Transference patterns and working alliance during the early phase of psychodynamic psychotherapy
Abstract
Background/Aim. Working alliance, as a collaborative part of the therapeutic relationship has been proven to be one of the most powerful therapeutic factors in psychotherapy in general, regardless many technical differences between numerous psychotherapeutic modalities. On the other hand, transference is the basic concept of psychodynamic psychotherapy, and, according to the psychoanalytic theory and practice, it forms a major part of the therapeutic relationship. The aim of our paper was to determine the differences between the groups of patients with low, middle, and high working alliance scores and the dropout group in transference patterns, socio-demographic and clinical parameters, during the early phase of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Methods. Our sample consisted of 61 non-psychotic patients, randomly selected by the method of consecutive admissions and treated with psychoanalytic psychotherapy in the outpatient clinical setting. The patients were prospectively followed during 5 initial sessions of the therapeutic process. The working alliance inventory and Core conflictual relationship theme method were used for the estimation of working alliance and transference patterns, respectively. According to the Working Alliance Inventory scores, four groups of patients were formed and than compared. Results. Our results show a significant difference between the groups of patients with low, middle, and high working alliance inventory scores and the dropout group on the variable – transference patterns in the therapeutic relationship. Conclusion. Disharmonious transference patterns are more frequent in patients who form poor quality working alliance in the early phase of psychotherapy, or early dropout psychotherapy. It is of great importance to recognize transference patterns of a patient at the beginning of the psychotherapeutic process, because of their potentially harmful influence on the quality of working alliance.
References
Bordin ES. Building therapeutic alliances: The base for integra-tion. Paper presented at the Society for Psychotherapy Re-search. Berkley, CA: University of California Press; 1989.
Horvath AO, Bedi RP. The alliance. In: Norcross JC, editor. Psy-chotherapy relationships that work. New York: Oxford Uni-versity Press; 2002.
Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Fluckiger C, Symonds DB. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. In: Norcross JC editor. Psychotherapy relationships that work. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis KM. Relation of the therapeutic al-liance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic re-view. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68(3): 438−50.
Bordin ES. Theory and research on the therapeutic working al-liance: New directions. In: Horvath AO, Greenberg LS, editors. The working alliance: theory, research, and practice New York: Wiley; 1994. p. 13–37.
Erić Lj. Psihoanaliza i psihoanalitička psihoterapija. In: Erić Lj, editors. Psihoterapija. Belgrade: Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; 2001.
World Health Organization. The ICD 10 Classification od mental and behavioral disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 1992.
Sheehan DV, Lecubrier Y, Sheehan KH, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM IV and ICD10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59(Suppl 20): 22−33; quiz 34−57.
Ramirez A, Ekselius L, Ramklint M. Axis V - Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF), further evaluation of the self-report version. Eur Psychiatr 2008; 23(8): 575−9.
OPD Task Force. Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis OPD-2- Manual of Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. USA, Toronto: Hogrefe and Huber; 2008.
Luborsky L. The relationship anecdotes paradigm (RAP) inter-view as a versatile source of narratives. In: Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P, editors. Understanding Transference - The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. 2nd ed. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 1998.
Albani C, Pokorny D, Blaser G, Kachele H. Beziehungsmuster und Beziehungskonflikte-Theory, Klinik und Forschung. Gottin-gen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 2008.
Horvath AO. Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Home Page. Available from: http://www.educ.sfu.ca/alliance/allianceA. [cited 1986].
Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. The working alliance: Theory, Re-search and Practice. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994.
Horvath AO. The therapeutic relationship: from transference to alliance. J Clin Psychol 2000; 56(2): 163−73.
Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. J Couns Psychol 1989; 36(2): 223−33.
Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM. Factor structure of the Working Alli-ance Inventory. J Clin Consult Psychol 1989; 1: 207−10.
Fazlagić A, Rakić-Bajić G. Attitudes of students toward psycho-therapy. PONS Med J 2011; 8(2): 48−52. (Serbian)
Gavrilov-Jerković V. Modern tendencies in psychotherapy: The specialisation of practice and knowledge integration. Psi-hologija 2003; 36(1): 7−38. (Serbian)
Lenzenweger MF, Lane MC, Loranger AW, Kessler RC. DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Rep-lication. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62(6): 553−64.
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Repli-cation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62(6): 593−602.
Zimmerman M, Chelminski I, Young D. The frequency of person-ality disorders in psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2008; 31(3): 405−20.
Krueger RF. Continuity of axes I and II: toward a unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders. J Pers Disord 2005; 19(3): 233−61.
Durrett C, Westen D. The structure of axis II disorders in ado-lescents: a cluster- and factor-analytic investigation of DSM-IV categories and criteria. J Pers Disord 2005; 19(4): 44061.
Barber JP, Connolly MB, Crits-Christoph P, Gladis L, Siqueland L. Alliance Predicts Patients’ Outcome Beyond In-Treatment Change in Symptoms. Pers Disord: Theory, Res Treatment 2009; S(1): 80−9.
Fitzpatrick MR, Iwakabe S, Stalikas A. Perspective divergence in the working alliance. Psychother Res 2005; 15(1−2): 69−79.
Tryon GS, Blackwell S, Hammel E. A meta analytic examination of client therapist perspectives of the working alliance. Psycho-ther Res 2007; 17(6): 629−42.
Tryon GS, Blackwell SC, Hammel EF. The magnitude of client and therapist working alliance ratings. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2008; 45(4): 546–51.
García Y, Botella L. Differential Analysis of Psychotherapy Outcome and Process:Correlates of Initial Disturbance (Anxi-ety vs. Depression). Int J Psychol Psychological Therapy 2011; 11(3): 347−58.
Beretta V, Despland JN, Drapeau M, Michel L, Kramer U, Stigler M, et al. Are relationship patterns with significant others reenacted with the therapist? A study of early transference reactions. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007; 195(5): 443−50.
Barret MS, Chua WJ, Crits-Christoph P Gibbons MB, Casiano D, Thompson D. Early withdrawal from mental health treatment: implications for psychotherapy. Psychotherapy 2008; 45(2): 247–67.
Ardito RB, Rabellino D. Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: historical excursus, measurements, and pros-pects for research. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 270.
Høglend P, Hersoug AG, Bøgwald KP, Amlo S, Marble A, Sørbye Ø, et al. Effects of Transference Work in the Context of Thera-peutic Alliance and Quality of Object Relations. J Consult Clin Psychol 2011; 79(5): 697−706.
Jarry JL. Core conflictual relationship theme - guided psycho-therapy: Initial effectiveness study of a 16-session manualized approach in a sample of six patients. Psychol Psychother 2010; 83(4): 385−94.