Is there a correlation between blood glucose curve and the insulin resistance during oral glucose tolerance test in females suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome?

  • Svetlana Spremović Radjenović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Miljan Pupovac University of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: polycystic ovary syndrome, glucose tolerance test, blood glucose, insulin resistance

Abstract


Abstract

 

Background/Aim. Insulin resistance occurs in approximately 60–80% of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in 95% of obese women with PCOS. Previous studies have shown that the shape of the glucose curve obtained during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may be useful as a metabolic screening parameter and could give insight into the future risk of diabetes mellitus type II. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of insulin resistance according to the Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and indirect assessment method of insulin resistance based on insulinemias during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (here in after “insulinemias during the OGTT”), as well as, frequency of glucose curve shapes (monophasic, biphasic, triphasic) in patients with PCOS. Also, the aim of research was testing the correlation between glucose curve shape and peak time of glucose during the OGTT with presence of insulin resistance in patients with PCOS. Methods. Patients were observed according to the following parameters: presence of insulin resistance, glucose curve shape and peak time of glucose and insulin during the OGTT. Results. The observed prevalence of insulin resistance in the PCOS group according to the HOMA-IR > 2.5 was 66.19% and according to insulinemias during the OGTT was 78.42%. The shape of the glucose curve was monophasic in 293 (70.26%), biphasic in 56 (13.43%) and triphasic in 68 (16.31%) of patients. There was statistically significant difference in the frequency of insulin resistance, according to glucose curve shape, only when it was defined by insulinemias during the OGTT (p = 0.005). Conclusion. According to results of the study, the most patients with PCOS have a monophasic shape of glucose curve. When we take frequency of insulin resistance in account, we notice approximately the same frequency in all types of curves, when it is defined by the HOMA-IR. On the other hand, when insulin resistance is defined by insulinemias during the OGTT, resistant patients with PCOS mostly have triphasic glucose curve shape.

References

Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Kouli CR, Bergiele AT, Filandra FA, Tsianateli TC, Spina GG, et al. A survey of the polycystic ovary syndrome in the Greek island of Lesbos: hormonal and meta-bolic profile. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84(11): 4006–11.

Asunción M, CalvoRM, San Milla´n JL, Sancho J, Avila S, Esco-bar-Morreale HF. A prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J Clin Endocrinol Meta. 2000; 85(7): 2434–8.

Azziz R, WoodsKS, Reyna R, Key TJ, Knochenhauer ES, Yildiz BO. The prevalence and features of the polycystic ovary syn-drome in an unselected population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89(6): 2745–9.

Dumesic DA, Oberfield SE, Stener-Victorin E, Marshall JC, Laven JS, Legro RS. Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Endocr Rev 2015; 36(5): 487–525.

Wild RA, Carmina E, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dokras A, Esco-bar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Assessment of cardiovas-cular risk and prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome: a consensus statement by the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (AE-PCOS) Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95(5): 2038–49.

Carmina E, Lobo RA. Use of fasting blood to assess the preva-lence of insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004; 82(3): 661–5.

DeUgarte CM, Bartolucci AA, Azziz R. Prevalence of insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome using the homeo-stasis model assessment. Fertil Steril 2005; 83(5): 1454–60.

Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Shirkavand F, Machicao F, Häring H, Stumvoll M. Assessing the shape of the glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(4): 1026‒33.

Abdul-Ghani MA, Lyssenko V, Tuomi T, Defronzo RA, Groop L. The shape of plasma glucose concentration curve during OGTT predicts future risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010; 26(4): 280–6.

Kanauchi M, Kimura K, Kanauchi K, Saito Y. Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity contribute to the shape of plasma glu-cose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test in non diabetic individuals. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59(4): 427–32.

Tura A, Morbiducci U, Sbrignadello S, Winhofer Y, Pacini G, Kau-tzy-Willer A. Shape of glucose, insulin, C-peptide curves dur-ing a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test: any relationship with the degree of glucose tolerance? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011; 300(4): R941‒8.

The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored PCOS consensus work-shop group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004; 19(1): 41‒7.

Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell functionfrom fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28(7): 412–9.

Apendix: Normal Hormone Reference Ranges. In: Gardner DG, Shoback D, editors. Greenspan's Basic and Clinical Endo-crinology, 10th ed. The International Edition: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2018. p. 847‒68.

Nolfe G, Spreghini MR, Sforza RW, Morino G, Manco M. Beyond the morphology of the glucose curve following an oral glucose tolerance test in obese youth. Eur J Endocrinol 2012; 166(1): 107–14.

Bianchi C, Miccoli R, Trombetta M, Giorgino F, Frontoni S, Faloia E, et al. Elevated 1-hour postload plasma glucose levels iden-tify subjects with normal glucose tolerance but impaired beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and worse cardiovascular risk profile: the GENFIEV study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98(5): 2100‒5.

Chung ST, Kasturi K, Bingham BA, Onuzuruike A, Baker RL, Utumatwishima JN, et al. Time to Glucose Peak During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Identifies High Risk for Prediabetes: Results from a Multiethnic Study. Endocr Soc 2017; 2017: OR14.

Kim J, Michaliszyn S, Nasr A, Lee S, Tfayli H, Hannon T, et al. The Shape of the Glucose Response Curve During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Heralds Biomarkers of Type 2 Diabe-tes Risk in Obese Youth. Diabetes Care 2016; 39(8): 1431‒9.

Abdul-Ghani MA, Jenkinson CP, Richardson DK, Tripathy D, De-Fronzo RA. Insulin secretion and action in subjects with im-paired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: results from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study. Diabetes 2006; 55(5):1430–5.

Yeckel CW, Taksali SE, Dziura J, Weiss R, Burgert TS, Sherwin RS, et al. The normal glucose tolerance continuum in obese youth: evidence for impairment in beta-cell function inde-pendent of insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90(2): 747–54.

Kramer CK, Vuksan V, Choi H, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Emerging parameters of the insulin and glucose response on the oral glucose tolerance test: reproducibility and implica-tions for glucose homeostasis in individuals with and without diabetes. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2014; 105(1): 88‒95.

Published
2021/06/14
Section
Original Paper