Indicators of the effectiveness of the healthcare financing system in the Western Balkan countries – critical analysis

  • Vladislava Stojić University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kragujevac, Serbia
  • Jevto Eraković Clinical Center of Montenegro, Clinic of Neurology, Podgorica, Montenegro
  • Nela Eraković Institute for Blood Transfusion of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
Keywords: balkan peninsula;, economics, medical;, health care costs;, health care sector;, models, theoretical

Abstract


Background/Aim. The main objective of the health system is to preserve and improve the general level of health of the population. Every country is making considerable efforts to ensure a sustainable healthcare financing system that would enable the qualitative realization of basic social security rights, rights to healthcare. The aim of the study was to determine the difference between the health system and the concepts of financing through the critical analysis of the system/model and indicators of financing health care in the Western Balkan countries. Methods. An overview of the current state of the health care system in the Western Balkan countries was based on data collected from sources such as the World Bank, World Health Organization, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) reports, health ministries, finance ministries and statistical institutes of all countries in the analysis. Following the classification of the data, some categories were created to identify differences and similarities between the funding methods used in the Western Balkan countries. The analysis was performed by measuring the effect of healthcare funding on variables by measuring performance. Because it is impossible to measure the relationship between variables in a single regression analysis model, several regression functions were used for accurately determining the relationship results. Results. The two indicators: a total expenditure on health services and institutions as a percent of gross domestic product (GDP), and health expenditure per capita shows weak positive correlation (p = 0.3) indicating that a higher amount of GDP per capita does not have a positive impact on the percentage of health expenditure in the Western Balkan countries observed. Despite differences in expenditures, all countries had a relatively similar funding method with different regulation that has impact on effectiveness of health system and resources used. Conclusion. The health sector in the Western Balkans is characterized by a lack of adequate administrative resources, legislation and regulations, as well as significant constraints in securing the necessary budget. Considering the resources devoted to the health sector in the Balkan countries, it can be said that the authorities in these countries do not see the health system as an important pillar of the country's development, as they do not devote sufficient financial resources to ensure the functioning of the health system.

References

Bredenkamp C, Mendola M, Gragnolati M. Catastrophic and im-poverishing effects of health expenditure: new evidence from the Western Balkans. Health Policy and Planning 2011; 26(4): 349‒56.

Burazeri G, Bregu A, Qirjako G, Roshi E, Petrela K, Bukli M, et al. National Health Report: Health Status of the Albanian Population. Tirana: Institute of Public Health; 2015.

Tomini S, Maarse H. How do patient characteristics influence informal payments for inpatient and outpatient health care in Albania: results of logit and OLS models using Albanian LSMS 2005. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 375.

World Health Organization, World Health Report. Health Sys-tems Financing: the Path to Universal Coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

O’Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M. Analyz-ing Health Equity using Household Survey Data: A Guide to Techniques and their Implementation. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2016.

Martić M, Đukić O. Health care systems in BiH. Financial chal-lenges and options for reform. Sarajevo: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung; 2017.

Federal Ministry of Health. Information on healthcare situation in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo: Fed-eral Ministry of Health; 2018. (Bosnian)

Lazarevik V. Leadership Monitoring (Report from monitoring and performance evaluation of program activities of the Gov-ernment of the Republic of Macedonia. Ohrid Institute for Economic Policy and International Relations 2018.

Lazarevik V, Donev D, Gudeva Nikovska D, Kasapinov B. Three periods of health system reforms in the Republic of Macedo-nia (1991-2011). Prilozi 2012; 33(2): 175‒89.

Apostolska Z, Tozija F. Annual National Report 2016. Analyt-ical Support on the Socio-Economic Impact of Social Protec-tion Reforms. Washington: World Bank Group; 2016.

Montenegro Ministry of Health. Integrity Assessment of Health Care System in Montenegro. Podgorica: Ministry of Health, Montenegro; 2017. (Montenegrin)

Ministry of Health of Montenegro. Health care system 2017-2018. Podgorica: Ministry of Health of Montenegro; 2018. (Monte-negrin)

Institute of Public Health of Serbia. Republic of Serbia - Selected Health Indicators for 2017. Belgrade: Institute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanovic Batut"; 2018. (Serbian)

Jakovljević M, Jovanović M, Lazić Z, Jakovljević V, Đukić A, Vel-icković R, et al. Current efforts and proposals to reduce healthcare costs in Serbia. Ser J Exp Clin Res 2011; 12(4): 161‒3.

World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Health financing policy: a guide for decision-makers. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe‎; 2008‎.

Thomson S, Foubister T, Mossialos E. Financing health care in the European Union. Challenges and policy responses. Co-penhagen: WHO, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2009.

Phillips CJ. Health Economics: an introductionfor health pro-fessionals. Swansea, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.

Irvine B, Ginsberg I. England vs Scotland: Does More Money Mean Better Health? London: Civitas ‒ Institute for the Study of Civil Society, 2004.

Published
2022/01/25
Section
Original Paper