Minimally invasive treatment of transorbital penetrating injury of skull base and cavernous sinus – A case report

  • Bojan Jelača University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Novi Sad, Serbia University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-3196
  • Djula Djilvesi University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Novi Sad, Serbia University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-7855
  • Vladimir Papić University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Novi Sad, Serbia University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-2417
  • Filip Pajičić University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Novi Sad, Serbia University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Milan Lepić Military Medical Academy, Department of Neurosurgery, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Petar Vuleković University Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Neurosurgery, Novi Sad, Serbia University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-8923
Keywords: decompression, surgical;, head injuries, penetrating;, minimally invasive surgical procedures;, neurosurgical procedures.

Abstract


Introduction. A transorbital intracranial injury with a foreign body can be a very complex and controversial therapeutic problem. The orbit's content is susceptible to penetrating trauma, and neurovascular skull base structures are at high risk from injury. There are some traditional cranial surgical approaches and more recently reported different endoscopic approaches for treating this kind of injury. Case report. We presented a case of a 30-year-old male who had an accident at work when a piece of wood hit him in his head and entered through the medial aspect of his left orbit with skull base and cavernous sinus injury. Rapid and complete radiological and clinical assessments were performed, and the patient was treated in a minimally invasive manner. The foreign body was manually extracted with an endoscopic and endovascular team ready to treat adverse events. No postoperative complications were reported, and visual acuity increased at the one-month follow-up. Conclusion. Penetrating wounds of the orbit represent a challenge that requires a multidisciplinary assessment and well-organized management. Combined endoscopic minimally invasive approaches should be considered during the treatment of this kind of injury.

References

Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mester V. The Birmingham eye trauma terminology system (BETTS). J Fr Ophtalmol 2004; 27(2): 206‒10.

Kitakami A, Kirikae M, Kuroda K, Ogawa A. Transorbital-transpetrosal penetrating cerebellar injury-case report. Neurol Med Chir 1999; 39(2): 150‒2.

Yamashita K, Noguchi T, Mihara F, Yoshiura T, Togao O, Yoshi-kawa H, et al. An intraorbital wooden foreign body: descrip-tion of a case and a variety of CT appearances. Emerg Radiol 2007; 14(1): 41‒3.

Figueira EC, Francis IC, Wilcsek GA. Intraorbital glass foreign body missed on CT imaging. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 23(1): 80‒2.

Espaillat A, Enzer Y, Lipsky S. Intraorbital metallic foreign body. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116(6): 824‒5.

Markowski J, Dziubdziela W, Gierek T, Witkowska M, Mrukwa-Kominek E, Niedzielska I, et al. Intraorbital foreign bodies-5 own cases and review of literature. Otolaryngol Pol 2012; 66(4): 295‒300.

Bard L, Jarrett W. Intracranial complications of penetrating orbital injuries. Arch Ophthalmol 1964; 71: 332‒42.

Steinsapir KD, Goldberg RA. Traumatic optic neuropathy: an evolving understanding. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151(6): 928‒33.e2.

Rivero OD, Charles Haskes OD. Traumatic optic neuropathy: a case report. Clin Eye Vis Care 1999; 11: 103‒7.

Robaei D, Fernando GT, Branley MG, MacDonald C. Lessons from practice. Orbitocranial penetration by a fragment of wood. Med J Australia 2004; 181(6): 329‒30.

Düz B, Secer HI, Gonul E. Endoscopic approaches to the orbit: a cadaveric study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52(3): 107‒13.

Markakis E, Kolenda H, Behnke J, Mühlendyck H. Frontobasal osteoplastic orbitotomy in surgical treatment of intraorbital processes. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg) 1990; 33(3): 73‒7. (Ger-man)

Turbin RE, Maxwell DN, Langer PD, Frohman LP, Hubbi B, Wolansky L, et al. Patterns of transorbital intracranial injury: a review and comparison of occult and non-occult cases. Surv Ophthalmol 2006; 51(5): 449‒60.

Presutti L, Marchioni D, Trani M, Ghidini A. Endoscopic re-moval of thmoidosphenoidal foreign body with intracranial extension. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006; 49(4): 244‒6.

du Trevou MD, van Dellen JR. Penetrating stab wounds to the brain: the timing of angiography in patients presenting with the weapon already removed. Neurosurgery 1992; 31(5): 905‒12.

Marchioni D, Bertossi D, Soloperto D, Bianconi L, Procacci P, Nocini PF. Traumatic Intraconal Foreign Body: Report of an Injury Corrected With Combined Surgical and Endoscopic Treat-ment. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2016; 12(1): 14‒8.

Published
2022/05/11
Section
Case report