Assessment of dental anodontia among Ferdinand I Military Technical Academy students in Romania

Dental anomalies among military students

  • Ancuța Dumitrița Dan Titu Maiorescu University, Doctoral School – Dental Medicine, Bucharest, Romania; Ferdinand I Military Technical Academy, Bucharest, Romania
  • Doina Lucia Ghergic Titu Maiorescu University, Doctoral School – Dental Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
Keywords: anodontia;, military personnel;, prevalence;, romania;, students.

Abstract


Background/Aim. Data regarding tooth absence among Romanian military personnel are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of dental anomalies among military students at the Military Technical Academy in Bucharest, Romania. Methods. A cohort of 318 military students was enrolled in the study. Each participant unde-rwent an extensive evaluation of their oro-dental health status based on guidelines of the European Global Oral Health Indicators Development II Project (EGOHID II). Results. Anodontia was discovered in 6 participants (prevalence rate was 1.9%), namely 4 women (prevalence among women was 4.6%) and 2 men (prevalence among men was 0.87%). Five of the six patients had never been previously diagnosed with anodontia. The most commonly affected teeth were second premolars (n = 8), followed by first premolars (n = 4) and second permanent molars (n = 2). Premolar anodontia was equally common in the maxilla and the mandible; both instances of molar anodontia were in the mandible. None of the participants with anodontia had remaining temporary teeth. A brief overview and two cases of dia-gnosed patients, who presented with inferior bilateral second molar anodontia and quadruple canine inclusion and a quadruple second premolar anodontia, are given. Conclusion. Military students in Romania would benefit from systematic dental evaluation and long-term monitoring prior to enrollment in the Military Academy.

References

1.      Foulis SA, Sharp MA, Redmond JE, Frykman PN, Warr BJ, Gebhardt DL, et al.  Army Physical Demands Study: Development of the Occupational Physical Assessment Test for Combat Arms soldiers. J Sci Med Sport 2017; 20 Suppl 4: S74‒8.

2.      Santtila M, Keijo H, Laura K, Heikki K. Changes in cardiovascular performance during an 8-week military basic training period combined with added endurance or strength training. Mil Med 2008; 173(12): 1173–9.

3.      APHC, Army Public Health Center. Health of the Force. 2015 p. 112. Available from: www.army.mil [cited 2020 June 2].

4.      NATO MILMED COE, NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine. Available from: https://www.coem
/>ed.org/files/stanags/03_AMEDP/AMedP-4.4_EDA_V2_E_
2466.pdf. [cited 2017 December 18].

5.      Ion G, Luca R, Nicolae C, Coculescu EC. Preliminary study on the distribution of partial edentations in a batch of young adults. Rom J Stomatol 2019; 65(1): 65–70.

6.      Basno A, Maxim A, Sain C, Balcoș C, Tatarciuc MS. Prevalence of edentulism and related social-behavioural factors among young adults of Iași, Romania. Int J Med Dent 2016; 20(3): 214–22.

7.      Meaney S, Anweigi L, Ziada H, Aleen F. The impact of hypodontia: a qualitative study on the experiences of patients. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34(5): 547–52.

8.      Amini F, Rakhshan V, Babaei P. Prevalence and pattern of hypodontia in the permanent dentition of 3374 Iranian orthodontic patients. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012; 9(3): 245–50.

9.      Nunn JH, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hobson RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, et al. The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: Background and role of paediatric dentistry. Br Dent J 2003; 194(5): 245–51.

10.   Polder BJ, Van't Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32(3): 217–26.

11.   Lamour CJ, Mossey PA, Thind BS, Forgie AH, Stirrups DR. Hypodontia-a retrospective review of prevalence and etiology. Part I. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(4): 263–70.

12.   Wu CC, Wong RW, Hägg U. A review of hypodontia: The possible etiologies and orthodontic, surgical and restorative treatment options-conventional and futuristic. Hong Kong Dent J 2007; 4(2): 113–21.

13.   Al Shahrani I, Togoo RA, Al Qarni MA. A review of hypodontia: Classification, prevalence, etiology, associated anomalies, clinical implications and treatment options. World J Dent 2013; 4(2): 117–25.

14.   Bilgin N, Kaya B. Etiology and treatment alternatives in tooth agenesis: A comprehensive review. Stomatol Dis Sci 2018; 2(11): 9.

15.   Brook AH. Dental anomalies of number, form and size: Their prevalence in British schoolchildren. J Int Assoc Dent Child 1974; 5(2): 37–53.

16.   Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health [cited 2018 December 17]. Available from: www.openepi.com
/SampleSize/SSPropor.htm

17.   European Global Oral Health Indicators Development II Project Report [cited 2018 December 10]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_projects/2005/action1/docs/action1_2005_frep_14_a20_en.pdf>

18.   Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E, Macfarlane TV. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod 2014; 41(4): 299‒316.

19.   Goya HA, Tanaka S, Maeda T, Akimoto Y. An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients. J Oral Sci 2008; 50(2): 143‒50.

20.   Bäckman B, Wahlin YB. Variations in number and morphology of permanent teeth in 7-year-old Swedish children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11(1): 11–7.

21.   Behr M, Proff P, Leitzmann M, Pretzel M, Handel G, Schmalz G, et al. Survey of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients in Eastern Bavaria. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33(1): 32–6.

22.   Aktan AM, Kara IM, Şener İ, Bereket C, Ay S, Ciftci ME. Radiographic study of tooth agenesis in the Turkish population. Oral Radiol 2010; 26(2): 95–100.

23.   Kim YH. Investigation of hypodontia as clinically related dental anomaly: Prevalence and characteristics. ISRN Dent 201; 2011:246135.

24.   Țenț A, Todor L, Ciavoi G, Popovici-Muț AM, Domocoș D, Pogan MD, et al. Non-syndromic hypodontia of permanent dentition associated with other dental anomalies in children and adolescents. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2018; 59(3): 879–83.

25.   Al-Ani AH, Antoun JS, Thomson WM, Merriman TR, Farella M. Hypodontia: An update on its etiology, classification, and clinical management.  Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 9378325.

26.   Trakiniené G, Ryliškyté M, Kiaušaité A. Prevalence of teeth number anomalies in orthodontic patients. Stomatologija 2013; 15(2): 47–53.

27.   Fekonja A. Hypodontia in orthodontically treated children. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27(5): 457–60.

28.   Sisman Y, Uysal T, Gelgor IE. Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients? Eur J Dent 2007; 1(3): 167–73.

29.   Chung CJ, Han JH, Kim KH. The pattern and prevalence of hypodontia in Koreans. Oral Dis 2008; 14(7): 620‒5.

30.   Endo T, Ozoe R, Kubota M, Akiyama M, Shimooka S. A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129(1): 29‒35.

31.   Cantekin K, Dane A, Miloglu O, Kazanci F, Bayrakdar S, Celikoglu M. Prevalence and intra-oral distribution of agenesis of permanent teeth among Eastern Turkish children. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2012; 13(1): 53–6.

32.   Zegan G, Mavru RB, Braha E. Craniofacial morphological changes of familial bilateral hypodontia of maxillary premolars. Rom J Morph Embryol 2014; 55(2): 443–8.

Published
2022/12/02
Section
Original Paper