Post nephrectomy renal function: donor nephrectomy vs. radical nephrectomy

  • Jelena Tadić Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Nephrology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nemanja Rančić Military Medical Academy, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Katarina Obrenčević Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Nephrology, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Milorad Radojević Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Nephrology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Predrag Marić Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Urology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Aleksandar Tomić University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Marijana Petrović Military Medical Academy, Clinic for Nephrology, Belgrade, Serbia; University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: glomerular filtration rate;, kidney neoplasms;, kidney transplantation;, nephrectomy;, tissue donors;, treatment outcome.

Abstract


Background/Aim. Monitoring the renal function following donor nephrectomy (DN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) due to kidney tumors is considered essential. The aim of this study was to compare pre-operative and post-operative renal function in patients who underwent DN in relation to patients who underwent RN due to renal malignancy. Methods. A retrospective case-control study was performed, which included 199 patients divided into two groups: group 1 (105 patients) were patients who underwent DN due to living-related/unrelated kidney transplantation, while group 2 (94 patients) was a control group, and included patients who underwent RN due to clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the T1bNoM0 clinical stage, where this surgical procedure was the final form of treatment. Results. Pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) according to the Chronic Kidney Disease−Epidemiology Collaboration (EPI) equation (eGFR EPI) in the DN group was 94.95 mL/min/1.73 m2, while in the RN group, it was 71.00 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients who underwent RN tended to have eGFR EPI below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 after ten years of follow-up compared with patients who underwent DN. In the DN group, the average eGFR EPI was 80.40 mL/min/1.73 m2, and in the RN group, it was 56.00 mL/min/1.73 m2. A higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and arterial hypertension (AH) was also observed in the DN group of patients compared to the RN group (AH: 44.3% vs. 21.3%; DM: 22.6% vs. 9.6%, respectively). Conclusion. Comparative monitoring of these two groups showed that in both groups, the recovery of the renal reserve was achieved one year after nephrectomy due to the known adaptive mechanisms. Even though the initial renal reserve in a kidney donor is reduced after living kidney transplantation (nephrectomy, permanent loss of renal mass), kidney donors recover kidney function within the first year after surgery due to the adaptive mechanisms.

References

1.      NHS Blood and Transplant. Annual report on kidney transplantation report for 2018/2019. Available at: https://nhsbtdbe.blob.core.windows.net/umbraco-assets-corp
/>/16778/nhsbt-kidney-transplantation-annual-report-2018-19.p
df

2.      Domínguez-Gil B, de la Oliva Valentín M, Martín Escobar E, Cruzado JM, Pascual J, Fernández Fresnedo G. Present situation of living-donor kidney transplantation in Spain and other countries: past, present and future of an excellent therapeutic option. Nefrologia 2010; 30(Suppl 2): 3‒13. Spanish.

3.      Zhu D, Everly MJ. Deceased donor kidney transplantation in the United States from 1988 to 2011: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS registry. Clin Transpl 2012:1-12.

4.      Hart A, Lentine KL, Smith JM, Miller JM, Skeans MA, Prentice M, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant 2021; 21(Suppl 2): 21‒137.

5.      Israni AK, Zaun D, Rosendale JD, Schaffhausen C, McKinney W, Snyder JJ. OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Deceased Organ Donors. Am J Transplant 2021; 21(Suppl 2): 521‒58.

6.      Steiner RW. 'Normal for now' or 'at future risk': a double standard for selecting young and older living kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2010; 10(4): 737‒41.

7.      Vavić N, Tomić A, Aleksić P, Obrenčević K, Radojević M, Ignjatović Lj, et al. Graft and patient survival after renal transplantation in the period from 1996-2017 in Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia. Vojnosanit Pregl 2020. doi: 10.2298/VSP190313091V.

8.      Pihlstrøm H, Birkeland KI, Reisæter AV, Midtvedt K, Hartmann A, Holdaas H, et al. Increased risk of ischemic heart disease after kidney donation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021: gfab054. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab054.

9.      Mjøen G, Maggiore U, Kessaris N, Kimenai D, Watschinger B, Mariat C, et al Long-term risks after kidney donation: how do we inform potential donors? A survey from DESCARTES and EKITA transplantation working groups. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36(9): 1742‒53.

10.   Sanchez OA, Ferrara LK, Rein S, Berglund D, Matas AJ, Ibrahim HN. Hypertension after kidney donation: Incidence, predictors, and correlates.; Am J Transplant 2018; 18(10): 2534‒

11.   Tushla L, Rudow DL, Milton J, Rodrigue JR, Schold JD, Hays R. American Society of Transplantation. Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation: Reducing Financial Barriers to Live Kidney Donation-Recommendations from a Consensus Conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 10(9): 1696‒702.

12.  LaPointe Rudow D, Hays R, Baliga P, Cohen DJ, Cooper M, Danovitch GM, et al. Consensus conference on best practices in live kidney donation: recommendations to optimize education, access, and care. Am J Transplant 2015; 15(4): 914‒22.

13.   Sachdeva M, Bhaskaran M, Molmenti EP, Dalton D, Mattana J. Approach to the pretransplant evaluation of the living kidney donor. J Transplant 2011; 2011: 245738.

14.   Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, Adams PL, Alberú J, Bakr MA, et al. Summary of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation 2017; 101: 1783–92.

15.   Gardan E, Jacquemont L, Perret C, Heudes PM, Gourraud PA, Hourmant M, et al. Renal cortical volume: High correlation with pre- and post-operative renal function in living kidney donors. Eur J Radiol 2018; 99: 118‒23.

16.   Shirasaki Y, Tsushima T, Saika T, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Kidney function after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2004; 64(1): 43‒7; discussion 48.

17.   Süer E, Burgu B, Gökce Mİ, Türkölmez K, Bedük Y, Baltaci S. Comparison of radical and partial nephrectomy in terms of renal function: a retrospective cohort study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011; 45(1): 24‒9.

18.   Timsit MO, Nguyen KN, Rouach Y, Elie C, Loupy A, Fournier C, et al. Kidney function following nephrectomy: similitude and discrepancies between kidney cancer and living donation. Urol Oncol 2012; 30(4): 482‒6.

19.   Pettus JA, Jang TL, Thompson RH, Yossepowitch O, Kagiwada M, Russo P. Effect of baseline glomerular filtration rate on survival in patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors. Mayo Clin Proc 2008; 83(10): 1101‒6.

20.   Kardauskaite Z, Uogintaite J. Comparison of methods for evaluating renal function (Data of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital in 2006). Medicina (Kaunas) 2007; 43(Suppl 1): 46‒51. (Lithuanian)

21.   Gossmann J, Wilhelm A, Kachel HG, Jordan J, Sann U, Geiger H, et al. Long-term consequences of live kidney donation follow-up in 93% of living kidney donors in a single transplant center. Am J Transplant 2005; 5(10): 2417‒24. 

22.   Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, Mehta SH, Singer AL, Taranto SE, et al. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA 2010; 303(10): 959‒66.

23.   Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H, et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(5): 459‒69.

24.   Wilton P, Aperia A, Broberger O, Wikstad I. Renal compensatory hypertrophy in children with unilateral renal disease. Acta Paediatr Scand 1980; 69(1): 83‒8.

25.   Donckerwolcke RM, Coppes MJ. Adaptation of renal function after unilateral nephrectomy in children with renal tumors. Pediatr Nephrol 2001; 16(7): 568‒74.

26.   Barlow LJ, Korets R, Laudano M, Benson M, McKiernan J. Predicting renal functional outcomes after surgery for renal cortical tumours: a multifactorial analysis. BJU Int 2010; 106(4): 489‒92.

27.   Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, Snyder M, Vickers AJ, Raj GV, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7(9): 735‒40.

28.   Tomić A, Jevtić M, Novak M, Ignjatović L, Zunić G, Stamenković D. Changes of glomerular filtration after nephrectomy in living donor. Int Surg 2010; 95(4): 343‒9.

29.   Fehrman-Ekholm I, Dunér F, Brink B, Tydén G, Elinder CG. No evidence of accelerated loss of kidney function in living kidney donors: results from a cross-sectional follow-up. Transplantation 2001; 72(3): 444‒9.

30.   Ellison MD, McBride MA, Taranto SE, Delmonico FL, Kauffman HM. Living kidney donors in need of kidney transplants: a report from the organ procurement and transplantation network. Transplantation 2002; 74(9): 1349‒51.

31.   Gazel E, Biçer S, Ölçücüoğlu E, Yığman M, Taştemur S, Çamtosun A, et al. Comparison of renal function after donor and radical nephrectomy. Ren Fail 2015; 37(3): 377‒80.

32.   Lam NN, Lloyd A, Lentine KL, Quinn RR, Ravani P, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Changes in kidney function follow living donor nephrectomy. Kidney Int 2020; 98(1): 176‒86.

33.   Leppert JT, Lamberts RW, Thomas IC, Chung BI, Sonn GA, Skinner EC, et al. Incident CKD after Radical or Partial Nephrectomy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29(1): 207‒16.

34.   Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 2000; 163(2): 442‒5.

35.   Marić P, Aleksić P, Košević B, Jovanović M, Bančević V, Simić D, et al. Elective partial and radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma in CT1B stadium. Vojnosanit Pregl 2022; doi.org/10.2298/VSP200520008M. (In Press)

Published
2022/12/02
Section
Original Paper