Root and canal-specific features of maxillary first molars with fused roots
Abstract
Background/Aim. Maxillary first molars are one of the most challenging teeth for endodontic therapy. There are certain disparities in the number of roots and canals and canal interrelationships within the same root, particularly those with fused roots. The aim of the study was to assess ex vivo features of roots, root canals, and canal walls in maxillary first molars with fused roots. Methods. Out of the total of 366 maxillary first molars, 64 extracted maxillary first molars with fused roots were included in the study using cone-beam computed tomographic and microscopic examining. Tooth dimensions at the level of pulp chamber floor, number, location and distance between orifices, number and canal morphology, canal wall thickness, and features of apical foramina were examined and measured. Results. The incidence of maxillary first molars with root fusion was 17.5%, of which 60.0% was palatal fused to distobuccal root. At the level of the pulp chamber floor, the bucco-palatal dimension was significantly larger at 10.4 mm than M-D with 7.0 mm. Four canal orifices were detected in 65.6%, with the shortest distance of 1.95 mm between MB1 and MB2. In fused roots, two or three canals most frequently correlated strongly with the number of major apical foramina. No fusion of canals was found in fused roots. The thinnest canal wall in the mesiobuccal and distobuccal fused root was mesial with 1.25 mm, and distal with 1.31 mm, while for the palatal root, the thinnest was the palatal wall with 1.97 mm. Two or three large apex foramina were registered with a significant correlation with the number of canals in the fused root. Conclusion. The most frequent type of fusion was between the palatal and distobuccal roots. Bucco-palatal dimension at the level of the pulp chamber floor was significantly larger than the mesiodistal, with the shortest inter-orifice distance between the MB1 and MB2 orifice. The number of canals was either two or three, coinciding with the number of major apical foramina. There was no fusion of the canals in fused roots. The thinnest canal wall was either mesial or distal.
References
1. Bergmans L, Lambrechts P. Root canal system anatomy. In: Bergenholtz G, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Reit C, editors. Textbook of Endodontology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2011. P. 170‒80.
2. Gopikrishna V, Reuben J, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with two palatal roots and a single fused buccal root diagnosed with spiral computed tomography – a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105(4): e74‒8.
3. Song CK, Chang HS, Min KS. Endodontic management of supernumerary tooth fused with maxillary first molar by using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2010; 36(11): 1901‒4.
4. Bjørndal L, Lasutsten MH, Reit C. Root canal treatment in Denmark is most often carried out in carious vital molar teeth and retreatments are rare. Int Endod J 2006; 39(10): 785‒90.
5. Vertucci FJ, Haddix JE, Britto LR. Tooth morphology and access cavity preparation. In: Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, editors. Pathways of the Pulp. 9th ed. St.Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2006. p. 203‒16.
6. Ahmed HM, Abbott PV. Accessory roots in maxillary molar teeth: a review and endodontic considerations. Austral Dent J 2012; 57(2): 123‒31; quiz 248.
7. Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A. Missed anatomy: frequency and clinical impact. Endod Topics 2009; 15(1): 3‒15.
8. Liu J, Que KH, Xiao ZH, Wen W. Endodontic management of the maxillary first molars with two root canals: A case report and review of the literature. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(1): 79‒88.
9. Tian XM, Yang XW, Qian L, Wei B, Gong Y. Analysis of the root and canal morphologies in maxillary first and second molars in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2016; 42(5): 696‒701.
10. Pan JY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19(14): 1‒15.
11. Nikoloudaki GE, Kontogiannis TG, Kerezoudis NP. Evaluation of the Root and Canal Morphology of Maxillary Permanent Molars and the Incidence of the Second Mesiobuccal Root Canal in Greek Population Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Open Dent J 2015; 9: 267-‒2.
12. Bhuyan AC, Kataki R, Phyllei P, Gill GS. Root canal configuration of permanent maxillary first molar in Khasi population of Meghalaya: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17(4): 359‒63.
13. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007; 33(9): 1121‒32.
14. Patel S, Horner K. The use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int Endod J 2009; 42(9): 755‒6.
15. Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J 2011; 44(2): 162‒9.
16. Popović M, Živanović S, Vučićević T, Grujović M, Papić M. Cone-beam computed study of tooth root and canal morphology of permanent molars in a Serbian population. Vojnosanit Pregl 2020; 77(5): 470‒8.
17. Lyra CM, Delai D, Pereira KC, Pereira GM, Pasternak Júnior B, Oliveira CA. Morphology of Mesiobuccal Root Canals of Maxillary First Molars: a comparison of CBCT scanning and Cross-sectioning. Braz Dent J 2015; 26(5): 525‒9.
18. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Surendran S. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal systems evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod 2011; 37(5): 715‒9.
19. Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod 1990; 16(7): 311‒7.
20. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 3‒29.
21. Song CK, Chang HS, Min KS. Endodontic management of supernumerary tooth fused with maxillary first molar by using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2010; 36(11): 1901‒4.
22. Shakouie S, Ghasemi N, Gholizadeh S. Two-rooted maxillary first molars with two canals: a case series. Iran Endod J 2013; 8(1): 29‒32.
23. Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod 2012; 38(8): 1063‒8.
24. Mashyajkhy M, Chourasia H, Jabali A, Almutairi A, Gambarini G. Analysis of fused rooted maxillary first and second molars with merged and C-shaped canal configurations: Prevalence, characteristics and correlations in Saudi Arabian population. J Endodod 2019; 45(10): 1209‒18.
25. Cleghorn BH, Christie WM, Dong CC. Root and root canal morphology of the human permanent maxillary first molar: A literature review. J Endod 2006; 32(9): 813‒21.
26. Beljic-Ivanovic K. Number, configuration, direction and shape of curvature of root canals in maxillary first molars [thesis]. Belgrade: University of Belgrade, Faculty of Dentistry; 2003. (Serbian)
27. Beljic-Ivanovic K, Teodorovic N. Morphological characteristics of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2010; 138(7‒8): 414‒9.
28. Fava LR. Root canal treatment in an unusual maxillary first molar. Int Endod J 2001; 34(8): 649-53.
29. de la Torre F, Cisneros-Cabello R, Aranguren JL, Estévez R, Velasco-Ortega E, Segura-Egea JJ. Single-rooted maxillary first molar with a single canal: endodontic retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008; 106(6): e-66‒8.
30. Acar B, Kamburoğlu K, Tatar İ, Arıkan V, Çelik HH, Yüksel S, et al. Comparison of micro-computerized tomography and cone-beam computerized tomography in the detection of accessory canals in primary molars. Imag Sci Dent 2015; 45(4): 205‒11.
31. Somma F, Leoni D, Plotino G, Grande NM, Plasschaert A. Root canal morphology of the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars: a micro-computed tomographic analysis. Int Endod J 2009; 42(2): 165‒74.
32. Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy S. Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. Eur J Endod 2015; 9(4): 500‒7.
33. Davis A, Patel S, Foschi F, Mitchel PJ, Manocci F. The detection of periapicalpathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth – part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J 2016; 49(7): 623‒35.
34. Martins JN, Mata A, Marques D, Caramês J. Prevalence of Root Fusions and Main Root Canal Merging in Human Upper and Lower Molars: A Cone-beam Computed Tomography In Vivo Study. J Endod 2016; 42(6): 900‒8.
35. Bauman R, Scarfe W, Clark S, Morelli J, Scheetz J, Farman A. Ex vivo detection of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions. Int Endod J 2011; 44(8): 752‒8.
36. Gobashy AM, Nagy MM, Bayoumi AA. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary first molars in an Egyptian population by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2017; 43(7): 1089‒92.
37. Marcano-Caldera M, Mejia-Cardona JL, Blanco-Uribe MP, Chaverra-Mesa EC, Rodríguez-Lezama D, Parra-Sánchez JH. Fused roots of maxillary molars: characterization and prevalence in a Latin American sub-population: a cone beam computed tomography study. Restor Dent Endod 2019; 44(2): e16.
38. Silva EJ, Nejaim Y, Silva AI, Haiter-Neto F, Zaia AA, Cohenca N. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian population using cone-beam computed tomographic imaging: an in vivo study. J Endod 2014; 40(2): 173‒6.
39. Mohara NT, Coelho MS, de Queiroz NV, Borreau MLS, NishiokaMM, de Jesus Soares A, et al. Root anatomy and canal configuration of maxillary molars in Brazilian subpopulation: A 125-μm cone-beam computed tomographic study. Eur J Dent 2019; 13(1): 82‒7.
40. Naseri M, Safi Y, Akbarzadeh Baghban A, Khayat A, Eftekhar L. Survey of anatomy and root canal morphology of maxillary first molars regarding age and gender in an Iranian population using cone beam computed tomography. Iran Endod J 2016; 11(4): 298–303.
41. Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, Park W, Jeong JS, Lee Y, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111(6): 785‒91.
42. Ross IF, Evanchik PA. Root Fusion in molars: Incidence and sex linkage. J Periodontol 1981; 52(11): 663‒7.
43. Al-Shehri S, Al-Nazhan S, Shoukry S, Al-Shwaimi E, Al-Sadhan R, Al-Shemmery B. Root and canal configuration of the maxillary first molar in a Saudi subpopulation: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J 2017; 7(2): 69‒76.
44. Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM. A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod 2010; 36(9): 1480‒4.
45. Pécora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa Neto MD, Issa EP. Morphologic study of the maxillary molars.
46. Bansal P, Nikhil V, Malhotra P, Singh V. Maxillary first molar with two roots and two root canals: A rare case report. Endodontology 2018; 30(1): 84‒7.
47. Al-Kadhim AH, Raijon ZA, Malik NA, Jaafar AB. Morphology of maxillary first molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography among Malaysian: Variations among the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. Int Med J Malaysia 2017; 16(2): 33‒9.
48. Gopikrishna V, Bhargavi N, Kandaswamy D. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with a single root and a single canal diagnosed with the aid of spiral CT: a case report. J Endod 2006; 32(7): 687‒91.
49. Chhabra N, Singbal KP, Chhabra TM. Type I canal configuration in a single rooted maxillary first molar diagnosed with an aid of cone beam computed tomographic technique: A rare case report. J Conserv Dent 2013; 16(4): 385‒7.
50. Desai N, Jadhav RG, Raghavendra SS, Mittal P, Patil G. Endodontic management of maxillary first molar with type I canal configuration – A rare case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9(4): ZD16‒7.
51. Jo HH, Min JB, Hwang HK. Analysis of C-shaped root canal configuration in maxillary molars in a Korean population using cone-beam computed tomography. Rest Dent Endod 2016; 41(1): 55-62.
52. Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J. Root and root canal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2017; 50(11): 1013–26.
53. Spagnuolo G, Ametrano G, D’Antò V, Formasino A, Simeone M, Riccitello F, et al. Microcomputed tomography analysis of mesiobuccal orifices and major apical foramen in first maxillary molars. Open Dent J 2012; 6: 118‒25.
54. Magat G, Hakbilen S. Prevalence of second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary molars from a Turkish subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2019; 78(2): 351‒8.
55. Keçeci AD, Kaya BU, Sener E. Determination of canal orifice co-ordinates and MB2 incidence of maxillary first molars in a Turkish sub-population. Acta Odon Scand 2014; 72(5): 354‒61.
56. Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography, Int Endod J 2012; 45(11): 996‒1003.
57. Martins JN, Quaresma S, Quaresma MC, Frisbie-Teel J. C-shaped maxillary permanent first molar: a case report and literature review. J Endod 2013; 39(12): 1649‒53.
58. Morfis A, Sylaras SN, Georgopoulou M, Kernani M, Prountzos F. Study of the apices of human permanent teeth with the use of a scanning electron microscope. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 1994; 77(2): 172‒6.
59. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012; 38(1): 101‒4.
60. Bürklein S, Tsotsis P, Schäfer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod 2013; 39(4): 501‒4.
61. Matus D, CantinM, Navarro P, Fonseca GM. Evaluation of the cement/dentin thickness of the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars by optical microscopy in a Chilean sample. Biomed Res (India) 2017; 28(16): 6975‒9.
62. Degerness RA, Bowles WR. Dimension, anatomy and morphology of the mesiobuccal root canal system in maxillary molars. J Endod 2010; 36(6): 985‒9.
63. Yoo YJ, Lee JK, Perinpanayagam H, Oh S, Gu Y, Chang SW, et al. Morphological measurements of two separate mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars using micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Invest 2020; 24(11): 3863‒70.
64. Mc Hugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22(3): 276‒82.