A single-file endodontic treatment – A promising endodontic concept

Hulsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PM. Mechanical prepara-tion of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top 2005; 10(1): 30‒76.

Sharma P, Goel M, Verma S, Sachdeva GS, Sharma N, Kumar V. Entering A New Era in Endodontics with Revolutionary Single File Systems: A Comprehensive Review. EC Dent Sci 2016; 5(3): 1100‒22.

Spicciarelli V, Corsentino G, Ounsi HF, Ferrari M, Grandini S. Shaping effectiveness and surface topography of reciprocat-ing files after multiple simulated uses. J Oral Sci 2019; 61(1): 45‒52.

Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodon-tics. Dent Clin North Am 2010; 54(2): 291‒312.

Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Loiola LE, Morgental RD, Leonardo Rde T, Tanomaru-Filho M. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Braz Dent J 2013; 24(1): 21‒4.

Živković S, Nešković J, Jovanović-Medojević M, Popović-Bajić M, Živković-Sandić M. The efficacy of XP-endo SHAPER (XPS) in cleaning the apical third of the root canal. Serb Dent J 2017; 64(4): 171‒8.

Gavini G, Santos MD, Caldeira CL, Machado MEL, Freire LG, Iglecias EF, et al. Nickel-titanium instruments in endo-dontics: a concise review of the state of the art. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32(Suppl 1): e67.

Basturk FB, Nekoofar MH, Ovecoglu HS, Berker YG, Gunday M, Messer HH, et al. Fractographic analysis of ProTaper and Mtwo systems: Breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. Saudi J Oral Sci 2014; 1(1): 19‒24.

Kumar SR, Gade V. Single file NiTi Rotary systems. IJMDS 2015; 4(1): 701‒7.

Uygun AD, Unal M, Falakaloglu S, Guven Y. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of hyflex EDM, vortex blue, protaper gold, and onecurve nickel-Titanium instruments. Niger J Clin Pract 2020; 23(1): 41‒5.

You SY, Kim HC, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Lee W. Shap-ing ability of reciprocating motion in curved root canals: a comparative study with micro-computed tomography. J En-dod 2011; 37(9): 1296‒300.

Vouzara T, el Chares M, Lyroudia M. Separated Instrument in Endodontics: Frequency, Treatment and Prognosis. Balk J Dent Med 2018; 22(3): 123‒32.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2009; 35(11): 1469‒76.

Jokanović V, Čolović B, Živković-Sandić M. The main character-istics and aplications of the shape memory aloys in ortho-dontics and endodontics. Stom Glas Srb 2019; 66(1): 29‒35.

Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000; 33(4): 297‒310.

Schen Y, Coil JM, Zhou H, Zheng Y, Haapasalo M. HyFlex nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use: metal-lurgical properties. Int Endod J 2013; 46(8): 720‒9.

Gutmann JL, Gao Y. Alteration in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel-titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused re-view. Int Endod J 2012; 45(2): 113‒28.

Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008; 34(8): 1003‒5.

Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, Park BM, Versluis A. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2009; 42(7): 593‒602.

Haapasalo M, Shen Y. Evolution of Nickel-titanium instru-ments:from past to future. Endod Topics 2013; 29(1): 3‒17.

Gao Y, Gutmann JL, Wilkinson K, Maxwell R, Ammon D. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2012; 38(3): 398‒401.

Anderson ME, Price JW, Parashos P. Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instru-ments. J Endod 2007; 33(10): 1212‒6.

Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, Vincenzi V, Giansiracusa A, Grande NM, et al. Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel. J Endod 2011; 37(9): 1293‒5.

Pereira ES, Singh R, Arias A, Peters OA. In vitro assessment of torque and force generated by novel ProTaper Next In-struments during simulated canal preparation. J Endod 2013; 39(12): 1615‒9.

Pereira ÉS, Viana AC, Buono VT, Peters OA, Bahia MG. Be-havior of nickel-titanium instruments manufactured with different thermal treatments. J Endod 2015; 41(1): 67‒71.

Kaval ME, Capar IC, Ertas H. Evaluation of cyclic fatique and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloys properties. J Endod 2016; 42(12): 1840‒3.

Plotino G, Testarelli L, Al-Sudani D, Pondione G, Grande NM, Gambarini G. Fatique resistance of rotary instruments manu-factured usung different nickel-titanium alloys: a compara-tive study. Odontology 2014; 102(1): 31‒5.

Zupanc J, Vadhat-Pajouh N, Schäfer E. New thermomechani-cally treated NiTi alloys – a review. Int Endod J 2018; 51(10): 1088‒103.

Fornari VJ, Silva-Souza YTC, Vanni JR, Pécora JD, Versiani MA, Souza-Neto MD. Histological evaluation of the ef-fetiveness of increased apical enlargement for cleaning the apical third of curved canals. Int Endod J 2010; 43(11): 988‒94.

Živković S, Jovanović-Medojević M, Nešković J, Popović-Bajić M, Živković-Sandić M. Efficiency of XP Endo Shaper (XPS) and Irrigation Protocol on the quality of Cleaning the Apical Third of Root Canal: SEM Study. Balk J Dent Med 2019; 23(1): 31‒5.

Parimoo D, Gupta R, Tomer A, Rohilla S. Single file endodon-tics: boon or myth? Asian Pac J Health Sci 2016; 3(2): 102‒5.

Kuzekanani M. Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: Devel-opment of the Single-File Systems. J Int Soc Prev Commu-nity Dent 2018; 8(5): 386‒90.

Varela-Patiño P, Ibañez-Párraga A, Rivas-Mundiña B, Cantatore G, Otero XL, Martin-Biedma B. Alternating versus continu-ous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on instru-ment life. J Endod 2010; 36(1): 157‒9.

Lee W, Hwang YJ, You SY, Kim HC. Effect of reciprocation usage of nickel-titanium rotary files on the cyclic fatigue re-sistance. Aust Endod J 2013; 39(3): 146‒50.

Van der Vyver PJ, Jonker C. Reciprocating instruments in en-dodontics: a review of the literature. SADJ 2014; 69(9): 404‒9.

Plotino G, Ahmed HM, Grande NM, Cohen S, Bukiet F. Cur-rent Assessment of Reciprocation in Endodontic Prepara-tion: A Comprehensive Review – Part II: Properties and Ef-fectiveness. J Endod 2015; 41(12): 1939‒50.

de Carvalho FM, Gonçalves LC, Marques AA, Alves V, Bueno CE, De Martin AS. Cleaning Effectiveness of a Reciprocat-ing Single-file and a Conventional Rotary Instrumentation System. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 704‒13.

Alcalde MP, Tanomaru-Filho M, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Camilo-Pinto J, et al. Cyclic and Tor-sional Fatigue Resistance of Reciprocating Single Files Man-ufactured by Different Nickel-titanium Alloys. J Endod 2017; 43(7): 1186‒91.

Kiefner P, Ban M, De-Deus G. Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of in-struments? Int Endod J 2014; 47(5): 430–6.

Saber SE, Schäfer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after prep-aration of severely curved root canals using the Reciproc single-file system with and without prior creation of a glide path. Int Endod J 2016; 49(11): 1057‒64.

Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary in-strument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41(4): 339‒44.

De-Deus G, Arruda TE, Souza EM, Neves A, Magalhães K, Thuanne E, et al. The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path. Int Endod J 2013; 46(10): 993‒8.

Weber J, Machtou P, Pertot W, Kuttler S, Ruddle C, West J. The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system. Roots 2011; 1: 28‒33.

De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010; 43(12): 1063‒8.

Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D, Gergi R, Culla A, De Angelis F, et al. Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instru-ments. J Endod 2012; 38(10): 1408‒11.

Castelló-Escrivá R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Román-Richon S, Faus-Llácer VJ. In vitro comparison of cyclic fa-tigue resistance of ProTaper, WaveOne, and Twisted Files. J Endod 2012; 38(11): 1521‒4.

Neelakantan P, Reddy P, Gutmann JL. Cyclic fatigue of two different single files with varying kinematics in a simulated double-curved canal. J Investig Clin Dent 2016; 7(3): 272‒7.

Salloum S, Torbey C, Bassam S, Claudia DIB. Reciprocal and continuous rotation is two sides of the same coin. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 2018; 9(3): 210‒3.

Yilmaz K, Özyürek T, Uslu G. Comparison of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of One Curve, Hyflex Edm, Waveone Gold and Reciproc Blue Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files at Intra-Canal Temperature. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2019; 22(1): 42‒7.

Azim AA, Tarrosh M, Azim KA, Piasecki L. Comparison be-tween Single-file Rotary Systems: Part 2-The Effect of Length of the Instrument Subjected to Cyclic Loading on Cyclic Fatigue Resistance. J Endod 2018; 44(12): 1837‒42.

Al-Sudani D, Kaabi H, Al Gamdi A, Al Dakheel A. The in-fluence of different angles and reciprocation on the shaping ability of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15(4): 451‒5.

Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, Schäfer E. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals. J Endod 2015; 41(4): 548‒52.

Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Shaping Ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM Single-file Systems in Simulated S-shaped Canals. J Endod 2017; 43(5): 805‒9.

Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J 2015; 48(1): 109‒14.

Elashiry MM, Saber SE, Elashry SH. Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcom-puted Tomography. Eur J Dent 2020; 14(1): 70‒6.

Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Apically extruded debris with recipro-cating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 2012; 38(6): 850‒2.

Poggio C, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Scribante A, Beltrami R, Colombo M. Effects of NiTi rotary and reciprocating instruments on debris and smear layer scores: an SEM evaluation. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2014; 12(3): 256‒62.

Plotino G, Giansiracusa Rubini A, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cutting efficiency of Reciproc and waveOne reciprocating instruments. J Endod 2014; 40(8): 1228‒30.

Robberecht L, Dehurtevent M, Lemaitre G, Béhal H, Hornez JC, Claisse-Crinquette A. Influence of Root Canal Curvature on Wall Cleanliness in the Apical Third during Canal Prepara-tion. Eur Endod J 2017; 2(1): 1‒6.

Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files. J Endod 2018; 44(5): 856‒9.

Nešković J, Ninković N, Opačić-Galić V, Jovanović-Medojević M, Popović-Bajić M, Maksimović M, et al. The influence of the fi-nal irrigation protocol on the efficiency of cleaning root ca-nal. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2020; 148(1‒2): 10‒6.

Živković S, Nešković J, Popović-Bajić M, Medojević-Jovanović M. The efficiency of canal cleaning with reciprocating move-ments instruments-SEM study. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2020; 148(3‒4): 148‒52.

Dhingra A, Ruhal N, Miglani A. Evaluation of Single File Systems Reciproc, Oneshape, and WaveOne using Cone Beam Computed Tomography -An In Vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9(4): ZC30‒4.

Zan R, Tunç T, Hubbezoğlu İ, Sümer Z. Apical extrusion of in-tracanal biofilm using ProTaper Gold, WaveOne Gold,Twisted File Adaptive, OneShape New Generation and K3XF. Eur Endod J 2016; 1(1): 1‒6.

Caviedes-Bucheli J, Moreno JO, Carreño CP, Delgado R, Garcia DJ, Solano J, et al. The effect of single-file reciprocating sys-tems on Substance P and Calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in human periodontal ligament. Int Endod J 2013; 46(5): 419‒26.

D'Amario M, De Angelis F, Mancino M, Frascaria M, Capogreco M, D'Arcangelo C. Canal shaping of different single-file sys-tems in curved root canals. J Dent Sci 2017; 12(4): 328‒32.

Mittal A, Dadu S, Singh NS, Singh S, Gupta B, Abraham A, et al. Comparative Assessment of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Reciproc and One Shape File Systems Using CBCT-An In Vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11(4): ZC31‒4.

Hasheminia SM, Farhad A, Sheikhi M, Soltani P, Hendi SS, Ahmadi M. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Single-file Systems. J Endod 2018; 44(12): 1788‒91.

Fontana CE, Ferraresso GM, Derigi LP, de Moura JDM, Pelegrine RA, Rocha DGP, et al. The impact of kinematics, single-file technique and preparation time on the apical ex-trusion of debris. G Ital Endod 2020; 34(2): 157‒64.

Nevares G, de Albuquerque DS, Freire LG, Romeiro K, Fogel HM, Dos Santos M, et al. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Com-pared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study. J Endod 2016; 42(5): 803‒8.

Azim AA, Wang HH, Tarrosh M, Azim KA, Piasecki L. Comparison between Single-file Rotary Systems: Part 1-Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects in Endodon-tic Retreatment. J Endod 2018; 44(11): 1720‒4.

Delai D, Jardine AP, Mestieri LB, Boijink D, Fontanella VRC, Grecca FS, et al. Efficacy of a thermally treated single file compared with rotary systems in endodontic retreatment of curved canals: a micro-CT study. Clin Oral Investig 2019; 23(4): 1837‒44.

Bartols A, Laux G, Walther W. Multiple-file vs. single-file endodontics in dental practice: a study in routine care. PeerJ 2016; 4: e2765.

Jain N, Pawar AM, Naganath M, Gupta A, Daryani H. Inci-dence and severity of postoperative pain after canal instru-mentation with reciprocating system, continuous rotary sin-gle file system, versus SAF system. ENDO (Lond Engl) 2016; 10(3): 153‒60.

Martinho FC, Gomes AP, Fernandes AM, Ferreira NS, Endo MS, Freitas LF, et al. Clinical comparison of the effective-ness of single-file reciprocating systems and rotary systems for removal of endotoxins and cultivable bacteria from pri-marily infected root canals. J Endod 2014; 40(5): 625‒9.

Amaral RR, Guimarães Oliveira AG, Braga T, Reher P, de Macêdo Farias L, Magalhães PP, et al. Quantitative Assess-ment of the Efficacy of Two Different Single-file Systems in Reducing the Bacterial load in Oval-Shaped Canals: A Clini-cal Study. J Endod 2020; 46(9): 1228‒34.

de Figueiredo FED, Lima LF, Oliveira LS, Ribeiro MA, Correa MB, Brito-Junior M, et al. Effectiveness of a reciprocating single file, single cone endodontic treatment approach: a randomized controlled pragmatic clinical trial. Clin Oral In-vestig 2020; 24(7): 2247‒57.

Caballero-Flores H, Nabeshima CK, Binotto E, Machado MEL. Fracture incidence of instruments from a single-file recipro-cating system by students in an endodontic graduate pro-gramme: a cross-sectional retrospective study. Int Endod J 2019; 52(1): 13‒8.

Mahmoodi B, Azaripour A, Sagheb K, Sagheb K, Willershausen B, Weusmann J. Undergraduate Students' Acceptance of a Reciprocating One-File System for Endodontic Treatment. Eur J Dent 2020; 14(3): 393‒6.

De-Deus G, Marins J, Silva EJ, Souza E, Belladonna FG, Reis C, et al. Accumulated hard tissue debris produced during re-ciprocating and rotary nickel-titanium canal preparation. J Endod 2015; 41(5): 676‒81.

de Carvalho FM, Gonçalves LC, Marques AA, Alves V, Bueno CE, De Martin AS. Cleaning Effectiveness of a Reciprocat-ing Single-file and a Conventional Rotary Instrumentation System. Open Dent J 2016; 10: 704‒13.

Živković S, Nešković J, Jovanović Medojević M, Popović Bajić M, Ostojić D. Efficiency of root canal cleaning using a single in-strument with reciprocating motion systems and full rota-tion systems: sem study. Serb Dent J 2018; 65(4): 171‒8.

Jokanović V, Čolović B, Ćetenović B, Živković S. Magnetron sput-tering methods for surface modification of shape memory al-loys for applications in orthodontics and endodontics. Serb Dent J 2019; 66(2): 87‒96.

Coltene [Internet]. The New Niti File Generation, Hyflex TM. A Miracle of Flexibility and Fracture Resistance [last accessed on 2021 february 24]. Available from: https://global.coltene.com/fileadmin/Data/EN/Products/Endodon-tics/Root_Canal_Shaping/HyFlex_EDM/6846_09-15_HyFlex_EN.pdf

Singh H, Kapoor P. Hyflex CM and EDM files: revolutioniz-ing the art and science of endodontics. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 2016; 5(7): 385‒7.

Coltene [Internet]. Next Generation One File Niti System, HyFlex EDM Rotary File: Unmatched Flexibility and Frac-ture Resistance in a One File System. [last accessed on 2021 Feb 24]. Available from: https://global.coltene.com/fileadmin/Data/EN/Products/Endodon-tics/Root_Canal_Shaping/HyFlex_EDM/31328A_HyFlexEDM_Brochure_US.pdf

Topçuoğlu HS, Düzgün S, Aktı A, Topçuoğlu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curva-ture. Int Endod J 2017; 50(7): 713‒7.

Inan U, Aydin C, Demirkaya K. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new and used Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments in two different radii of curvature. Aust Endod J 2011; 37(3): 105‒8.

Gao Y, Shotton V, Wilkinson K, Phillips G, Johnson WB. Ef-fects of raw material and rotational speed on the cyclic fa-tigue of ProFile Vortex rotary instruments. J Endod 2010; 36(7): 1205‒9.

Pedullà E, Benites A, La Rosa GM, Plotino G, Grande NM, Rapisarda E, et al. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. J Endod 2018; 44(4): 648‒53.

Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary in-struments. J Endod 2013; 39(2): 258‒61.

Al-Hadlaq SM. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue re-sistance of 25/0.04 and 25/0.06 twisted file rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Aust Endod J 2013; 39(2): 62‒5.

Tsujimoto M, Irifune Y, Tsujimoto Y, Yamada S, Watanabe I, Hayashi Y. Comparison of conventional and new-generation nickel-titanium files in regard to their physical properties. J Endod 2014; 40(11): 1824‒9.

Staffoli S, Grande NM, Plotino G, Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, For-tunato L, et al. Influence of environmental temperature, heat-treatment and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of three generations of a single-file nickel-titanium rotary in-strument. Odontology 2019; 107(3): 301‒7.

La Rosa GRM, Palermo C, Ferlito S, Isola G, Indelicato F, Pedullà E. Influence of surrounding temperature and angle of file access on cyclic fatigue resistance of two single file nick-el-titanium instruments. Aust Endod J 2020; doi: 10.1111/aej.12473.

Saberi EA, Mollashahi NF, Farahi F. Canal transportation caused by one single-file and two multiple-file rotary sys-tems: A comparative study using cone-beam computed to-mography. G Ital Endodon 2018; 32(2): 57‒62.

Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Cas-tellucci A, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary recip-rocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 2012; 38(4): 505‒9.

Dagna A. Nickel-Titanium Single-file System in Endodon-tics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16(10): 834‒9.

Donnermeyer D. Treatment of severely curved root canals with the single file rotary NiTi F6 SKY taper sysytem: A case report. ENDO (Lond Engl) 2017; 11(1): 57‒62.

Lacerda MFLS, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Provenzano JC, Neves MAS, Pires FR, et al. Cleaning and Shaping Oval Canals with 3 Instrumentation Systems: A Correlative Mi-cro-computed Tomographic and Histologic Study. J Endod 2017; 43(11): 1878-84.

Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M, Plotino G. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files. J Endod 2018; 44(5): 856‒9.

Elnaghy A, Elsaka S. Cyclic fatigue resistance of XP-endo Shaper compared with different nickel-titanium alloy in-struments. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22(3): 1433‒7.

Silva EJNL, Vieira VTL, Belladonna FG, Zuolo AS, Antunes HDS, Cavalcante DM, et al. Cyclic and Torsional Fatigue Re-sistance of XP-endo Shaper and TRUShape Instruments. J Endod 2018; 44(1): 168‒72.

Metzger Z, Teperovich E, Cohen R, Zary R, Paqué F, Hülsmann M. The self-adjusting file (SAF). Part 3: removal of debris and smear layer-A scanning electron microscope study. J Endod 2010; 36(4): 697‒702.

Metzger Z. The self-adjusting file (SAF) system: An evi-dence-based update. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17(5): 401‒19.