Determination of spatial position of tibial graft using X-ray images after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Aleksandar Djuričin; Slobodan Tabaković; Milan Zeljković; Zoran Milojević; Radojka Jokšić Mazinjanin; Vukadin Milankov

doi:10.2298/VSP210726029D

Aleksandar Djuričin University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad Serbia
Slobodan Tabaković University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad, Serbia
Milan Zeljković University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad, Serbia
Zoran Milojević University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Novi Sad, Serbia
Radojka Jokšić Mazinjanin University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia
Vukadin Milankov University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP210726029D

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, computer-aided design, orthopedic procedures, radiography, tibia

Abstract

Background/Aim. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed knee surgeries in young adults. The success of this procedure largely depends on the proper formation of the tunnel, which is obtained by drilling the tibia and which serves to position and fix the graft. The aim of the study was to present a method for determining the spatial position of the graft based on only two standard X-rays. Methods. The study was performed on a group of 15 patients in whom the developed software applied the measurement of the angle of the tunnel in the tibia based on the selection of characteristic points on two standard X-rays of the knee (anterior-posterior and lateral projection). The obtained results were compared with the results of measuring the angle of the tunnel in the tibia on knee images by computed tomography (CT) in all patients. Results. The drilling angle measured in CT scans was, on average, somewhat greater (59.07° ± 5.61°) than the angle measured by applying a developed application (58.65° ± 5.89°). The obtained results indicated minimal differences without statistical significance in the measurements of the angle of the tunnel in the tibia using the developed software and on CT images (Wilcoxon test: Z = -1.363; p = 0.173). Conclusion. The presented method and developed software are suitable for everyday clinical applications in terms of precision and usability and can be used to assess the position of tunnels in the tibia in the process of determining the success of surgery or in preparing patients for revision surgery.

References

1. Irarrázaval S, Albers M, Chao T, Fu FH. Gross, Arthroscopic, and Radiographic Anatomies of the Anterior Cruciate Liga-ment: Foundations for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36(1): 9‒23.

2. Morris RC, Hulstyn MJ, Fleming BC, Owens BD, Fadale PD. Re-turn to Play Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Recon-struction. Clin Sports Med 2016; 35(4): 655‒68.

3. Filbay SR, Grindem H. Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2019; 33(1): 33‒47.

4. Melińska A, Czamara A, Szuba L, Będziński R, Klempous R. Balance Assessment during the Landing Phase of Jump-Down in Healthy Men and Male Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Recon-struction. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 2015; 12(6): 77‒91.

5. Barrera Oro F, Sikka RS, Wolters B, Graver R, Boyd JL, Nelson B, et al. Autograft versus allograft: an economic cost comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011; 27(9): 1219‒25.

6. Gupta PK, Acharya A, Mourya A, Mahajan P. Comparison of pa-tellar tendon versus hamstrings autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Indian population: A randomised control trial study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019; 10(3): 581‒5.

7. Chee MY, Chen Y, Pearce CJ, Murphy DP, Krishna L, Hui JH, et al. Outcome of Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Recon-struction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Pro-spective Randomized Trials. Arthroscopy 2017; 33(2): 450‒63.

8. Tan SHS, Lau BPH, Krishna L. Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Females Using Patellar-Tendon-Bone versus Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Knee Surg 2019; 32(8): 770‒87.

9. Wylie JD, Marchand LS, Burks RT. Etiologic Factors That Lead to Failure After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery. Clin Sports Med 2017; 36(1): 155‒72.

10. Thakrar RR, Yasen SK, Kundra R. Allograft use in anterior cru-ciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a review of the current literature. Orthop Trauma 2019; 33(2): 76‒80.

11. Milojevic Z, Tabakovic S, Vicevic M, Obradovic M, Vranjes M, Milankov MZ. The Tibial Aperture Surface Analysis In Anteri-or Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Process. Med Pregl 2016; 69(3‒4): 99‒105.

12. Jamsher M, Ballarati C, Viganò M, Hofbauer M, Togninalli D, Lafranchi S, et al. Graft Inclination Angles in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Vary Depending on Femoral Tunnel Reaming Method: Comparison Among Transtibial, Anterome-dial Portal, and Outside-In Retrograde Drilling Techniques. Arthroscopy 2020; 36(4): 1095‒102.

13. Lubis AMT, Kuncoro MW. Revision of failed-posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction due to tibial tunnel misplace-ment: A case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019; 48: 105‒8.

14. Wada O, Gamada K, Aoyama N, Mizuno K, Iwasaki Y. A differ-ence in rotational alignment of the tibio-femoral joint after an-terior cruciate ligament reconstruction between the bone-patellar tendon-bone and semitendinosus-gracilis grafts. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2019; 65: 45‒50.

15. van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Range of motion and complications following primary repair versus reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee 2017; 24(4): 798‒807.

16. Yamazaki J, Muneta T, Koga H, Sekiya I, Ju YJ, Morito T, et al. Radiographic description of femoral tunnel placement ex-pressed as intercondylar clock time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19(3): 418‒23.

17. Seo SS, Kim CW, Lee CR, Kwon YU, Kim MW, Kim OG, et al. Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position on Stability and Clinical Outcomes After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Outside-In Technique. Arthroscopy 2019; 35(6): 1648‒55.

18. Tabakovic S, Zeljkovic M, Milojevic Z. Automated Acquisition of Proximal Femur Morphological Characteristics. Measur Sci Rev 2014; 14(5): 285‒93.