The levels of circulating long non-coding RNA GAS5 in prostate carcinoma patients: a single-center study

  • Miroslav Mišović Military Medical Academy, Institute of Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Predrag Aleksić University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dejan Kostić Military Medical Academy, Institute of Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Miodrag Vuković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Bojan Radojičić Center for Military Medical Institutions, Department of Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nemanja Rančić University of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Bojana Cikota Aleksić Military Medical Academy, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: biomarkers, prognosis, prostate neoplasms, rna, long noncoding

Abstract


Background/Aim. Prostate carcinoma (PCa) is second occurring carcinoma that affects the male population. Although PCa incidence rates are high, most cases have a favorable prognosis, with comfortable long-term life quality. The aim of the study was to compare long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) growth arrest-specific transcript 5 (GAS5) plasma levels between healthy individuals and patients with PCa, and also between PCa patients with different prognostic scores. Methods. The present study included a total of 40 patients with PCa and a control group of 20 healthy individuals. PCa patients were divided into two subgroups (20 patients each) based on the prognostic criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. The patient data were collected and analyzed; lncRNA GAS5 levels were quantified using the real-time polymerase chain reaction method. Statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 computer program (IBM, USA, 2019). Results. The relative quantification of lncRNA GAS5 expression levels showed downregulation in PCa patients compared to healthy individuals; however, the difference was marginally statistically significant (p = 0.056). With further analysis of the given results, we concluded that the expression level of lncRNA GAS5 was not significantly different in the first patient subgroup and the healthy individuals (p = 0.268). Patients from the second subgroup had significantly lower plasma levels of lncRNA GAS5 than healthy individuals (p = 0.033). The difference in the level of lncRNA GAS5 expression between patients with favorable prognoses (Group 1) and the ones with worse prognostic scores (Group 2) did not indicate statistical significance (p = 0.275). In both Group 1 (p = 0.805) and Group 2 (p = 0.454), the plasma levels of lncRNA GAS5 were not significantly different in comparison to the age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years). Conclusion. One of the main objectives of PCa research is identifying novel and more efficient biomarkers. Conducted research provides strong evidence about the significance of lncRNAs GAS5 in PCa, as well as the correlation between decreased expression of lncRNA GAS5 and poor prognosis in various tumors.

References

1.      Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3): 209‒49.

2.      Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol 2019; 10(2): 63‒89.

3.      Thalmann GN, Anezinis PE, Chang SM, Zhau HE, Kim EE, Hopwood VL, et al. Androgen-independent cancer progression and bone metastasis in the LNCaP model of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1994; 54(10): 2577‒81.

4.      Houédé N, Rébillard X, Bouvet S, Kabani S, Fabbro-Peray P, Trétarre B, et al. Impact on quality of life 3 years after diagnosis of prostate cancer patients below 75 at diagnosis: an observational case-control study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20(1): 757.

5.      Siegel DA, O'Neil ME, Richards TB, Dowling NF, Weir HK. Prostate Cancer Incidence and Survival, by Stage and Race/Ethnicity - United States, 2001-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69(41): 1473‒80.

6.      Dimakakos A, Armakolas A, Koutsilieris M. Novel tools for Prostate Cancer Prognosis, Diagnosis, and Follow-Up. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 890697.

7.      Andriole GL Jr. PSA screening and prostate cancer risk reduction. Urol Oncol 2012; 30(6): 936‒7.

8.      Gasic V, Stankovic B, Zukic B, Janic D, Dokmanovic L, Krstovski N, et al. Expression Pattern of Long Non-coding RNA Growth Arrest-specific 5 in the Remission Induction Therapy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Med Biochem 2019; 38(3): 292‒8.

9.      Vesovic N, Tosic N, Karan Djurasevic T, Andrić Z, Zdravković D, Pavlović S, et al. Expression pattern of circulating long non-coding RNA GAS5 as a novel biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Arch Med Sci 2020: doi:10.5114/aoms.2020.98815.

10.  Yang X, Xie Z, Lei X, Gan R. Long non‑coding RNA GAS5 in human cancer (Review). Oncol Lett 2020; 20(3): 2587‒94.

11.   Kornienko AE, Guenzl PM, Barlow DP, Pauler FM. Gene regulation by the act of long non-coding RNA transcription. BMC Biol 2013; 11: 59.

12.   Pickard MR, Williams GT. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Action of Tumour Suppressor GAS5 LncRNA. Genes (Basel) 2015; 6(3): 484‒99.

13.   Guzel E, Okyay TM, Yalcinkaya B, Karacaoglu S, Gocmen M, Akcakuyu MH. Tumor suppressor and oncogenic role of long non-coding RNAs in cancer. North Clin Istanb 2019; 7(1): 81‒6.

14.   Nadhan R, Dhanasekaran DN. Decoding the Oncogenic Signals from the Long Non-Coding RNAs. Onco 2021; 1(2): 176‒206.

15.   Ji J, Dai X, Yeung SJ, He X. The role of long non-coding RNA GAS5 in cancers. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11: 2729‒37.

16.   Weber DG, Casjens S, Brik A, Raiko I, Lehnert M, Taeger D, et al. Circulating long non-coding RNA GAS5 (growth arrest-specific transcript 5) as a complement marker for the detection of malignant mesothelioma using liquid biopsies. Biomark Res 2020; 8: 15.

17.   Li J, Wang Y, Zhang CG, Xiao HJ, Xiao HJ, Hu JM, et al. Effect of long non-coding RNA GAS5 on proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis of colorectal cancer HT-29 cell line. Cancer Cell Int 2018; 18: 4.

18.   Smith CM, Steitz JA. Classification of GAS5 as a multi-small-nucleolar-RNA (snoRNA) host gene and a member of the 5'-terminal oligopyrimidine gene family reveals common features of snoRNA host genes. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18(12): 6897‒909.

19.   Tan Q, Zuo J, Qiu S, Yu Y, Zhou H, Li N, et al. Identification of circulating long non-coding RNA GAS5 as a potential biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis non-small cell lung cancer, long non-coding RNA, plasma, GAS5, biomarker. Int J Oncol 2017; 50(5): 1729‒38.

20.   Xue D, Zhou C, Lu H, Xu R, Xu X, He X. LncRNA GAS5 inhibits proliferation and progression of prostate cancer by targeting miR-103 through AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Tumor Biol 2016; doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5429-8.

21.   Fine SW. Evolution in Prostate Cancer Staging: Pathology Updates From AJCC 8th Edition and Opportunities That Remain. Adv Anat Pathol 2018; 25(5): 327‒32.

22.   Liang W, Lv T, Shi X, Liu H, Zhu Q, Zeng J, et al. Circulating long noncoding RNA GAS5 is a novel biomarker for the diagnosis of nonsmall cell lung cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95(37): e4608.

23.   du Breuil RM, Patel JM, Mendelow BV. Quantitation of beta-actin-specific mRNA transcripts using xeno-competitive PCR. PCR Methods Appl 1993; 3(1): 57‒9.

24.   Han L, Ma P, Liu SM, Zhou X. Circulating long noncoding RNA GAS5 as a potential biomarker in breast cancer for assessing the surgical effects. Tumor Biol 2016; 37: 6847‒54.

25.   Senousy MA, El-Abd AM, Abdel-Malek RR, Rizk SM. Circulating long non-coding RNAs HOTAIR, Linc-p21, GAS5 and XIST expression profiles in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: association with R-CHOP responsiveness. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 2095.

26.   Carter G, Miladinovic B, Patel AA, Deland L, Mastorides S, Patel NA. Circulating long noncoding RNA GAS5 levels are correlated to prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BBA Clin 2015; 4: 102‒7.

27.   Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DS, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer 2011; 11(6): 426‒37.

Published
2023/05/31
Section
Original Paper