The pros and cons of suturing the ventral hernia defect using the intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique
Abstract
Background/Aim. Laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery, including intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), is as effective and safe as open surgery, with a lower recurrence rate. Some surgeons advocate laparoscopic primary fascial closure (PFC) with intraperitoneal mesh placement to reduce recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcome between two laparoscopic techniques: the PFC technique and mesh placement without suture closure (IPOM technique) for defects under 4 cm in patients with ventral hernias. Methods. The study sample was comprised of 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery from January 1, 2018, until December 31, 2020. Half of the patients underwent only the IPOM technique (group of patients without the suture), while in others, this was preceded by the closure of the hernial ring (group of patients with the suture). All hernias were midline and all defects were under 4 cm. The studied groups were homogeneous according to gender and age. Comorbidities, complications, and postoperative comfort were monitored. Results. The most common (76%) hernias were primary, and the most common comorbidity was arterial hypertension (28%). One (2%) patient had intraoperative bleeding, and the most common postoperative complication was pain in 7 (14%) patients. After a three-year follow-up, there were 10 (20%) patients with complications – one hernia recurred, while 9 (18%) patients died. There was no difference in the types of occurrence of hernias, comorbidities, and intraoperative complications. The distribution of postoperative complications differed significantly (p = 0.007) between the groups. Pain was statistically significantly more prevalent in patients with sutures. During the first three months postoperatively, significantly more patients with sutures had chronic pain (χ2 = 8.140; p = 0.004). Conclusion. We recommend the application of the PFC technique in selected ventral hernia repair cases, although it can lead to more frequent postoperative pain (which, fortunately, is easily treated).
References
Eickhoff RM, Kroh A, Eickhoff S, Heise D, Helmedag MJ, Tolba RH, et al. A peritoneal defect covered by intraperitoneal mesh prosthesis effects an increased and distinctive foreign body re-action in a minipig model. J Biomater Appl 2021; 35(6): 732−9.
LeBlanc K. Proper mesh overlap is a key determinant in hernia recurrence following laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Hernia 2016; 20(1): 85−99.
Morales-Conde S. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: advances and limitations. Semin Laparosc Surg 2004; 11(3): 191−200.
Wennergren JE, Askenasy EP, Greenberg JA, Holihan J, Keith J, Liang MK, et al. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study. Surg Endosc 2016; 30(8): 3231−8.
Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, et al. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 2012; 16(3): 239–50.
Silecchia G, Campanile FC, Sanchez L, Ceccarelli G, Antinori A, Ansaloni L, et al. Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia re-pair: updated Consensus Development Conference based guidelines [corrected]. Surg Endosc 2015; 29(9): 2463–84. Er-ratum in: Surg Endosc 2015; 29(9): 2485.
Mikamori M, Nakahara Y, Iwamoto K, Hyuga S, Naito A, Ohtsuka M, et al. Intraperitoneal-onlay-mesh repair with hernia defect closure via the hernial orifice approach: A case series of 49 patients. Int J Surg Open 2021; 36: 100418.
Köckerling F, Lammers B, Weyhe D, Reinpold W, Zarras K, Adolf D, et al. What is the outcome of the open IPOM versus sublay technique in the treatment of larger incisional hernias?: A propensity score matched comparison of 9091 patients from the Herniamed Registry. Hernia 2021; 25(1): 23–31.
Suwa K, Okamoto T, Yanaga K. Is fascial defect closure with intraperitoneal onlay mesh superior to standard intraperitoneal onlay mesh for laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia? Asian J Endosc Surg 2018; 11(4): 378–84.
Giuffrida M, Rossini M, Pagliai L, Del Rio P, Cozzani F. Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM): Short- and Long-Term Results in a Single Center. Surgeries 2023; 4(1): 98−107.
Megas IF, Benzing C, Winter A, Raakow J, Chopra S, Pratschke J, et al. A propensity-score matched analysis of ventral-TAPP vs. laparoscopic IPOM for small and mid-sized ventral hernias. Comparison of perioperative data, surgical outcome and cost-effectiveness. Hernia 2022; 26(6): 1521−30.
Van Hoef S, Tollens T. Primary non-complicated midline ventral hernia: is laparoscopic IPOM still a reasonable approach? Hernia 2019; 23(5): 915–25.
Basukala S, Tamang A, Rawal SB, Malla S, Bhusal U, Dhakal S, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic hernioplasty with and without fascial repair (IPOM-Plus vs IPOM) for ventral hernia: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 80: 104297.
Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, Nunes QM, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Br J Surg 2016; 103(12): 1598–607.
Lambrecht JR, Vaktskjold A, Trondsen E, Øyen OM, Reiertsen O. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: outcomes in primary versus incisional hernias: no effect of defect closure. Hernia 2015; 19(3): 479–86.
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Jorgensen LN, Bisgaard T. Nationwide prospective study of outcomes after elective incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216(2): 217–28.
Lavanchy JL, Buff SE, Kohler A, Candinas D, Beldi G. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open intraperitoneal onlay mesh incisional hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33(1): 225–33.
Liot E, Bréguet R, Piguet V, Ris F, Volonté F, Morel P. Evaluation of port site hernias, chronic pain and recurrence rates after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A monocentric long-term study. Hernia 2017; 21(6): 917–23.