Bibliometric analysis of the 200 most cited papers in the journal Vojnosanitetski pregled
Abstract
Background/Aim. Vojnosanitetski pregled (VSP) is the official scientific and professional journal of the University of Defence in Belgrade, Serbia. VSP is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes a wide range of scientific and professional articles. The aim of the study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the 200 most cited articles published in VSP, and to as-sess the impact, significance, and scientific contribution of the journal. Methods. Using the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection (WoSCC) database, 2,664 articles published from 2008 to December 31, 2022, were analyzed, focusing on citation counts, author productivity, and collaboration networks. Results. The analysis revealed that the majority of the most cited articles came from Serbian institutions, with the University of Belgrade being the most prolific contributor. The top five most cited authors as well as the most cited article were identified, and a trend of increasing significance of research on bioactive compounds was noticed. The study also observed a shift in key word usage over time, reflecting changes in research trends within the journal. The collaboration network analysis showed a strong clustering among the leading authors, indicating a collaborative culture that contributes to the journal’s influence. Conclusion. Emphasizing the importance of targeted collaborations makes it evident that maintaining and expanding the journal’s impact on the scientific community is the key to improving medical research. Despite limitations such as reliance on a single database, the findings provide valuable insights into the journal’s role in advancing medical research and highlight the importance of targeted collaboration.
References
Dobrić S. Novelity in the new 2018. Vojnosanit Pregl 2018; 75(1): 5–7.
Dobrić S. Seventy years of the Vojnosanitetski pregled. Vojnosan-it Pregl 2014; 71(9): 805−8.
Dobrić S. The first impact factor ever of the Vojnosanitetski pregled. Vojnosanit Pregl 2011; 68(8): 635−8.
Moed HF. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer: Dordrecht; 2005. p. 348.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific re-search output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102(46): 16569−72.
Bornmann L, Daniel HD. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J Doc 2008; 64(1): 45−80.
Waltman L. A review of the literature on citation impact indi-cators. J Informetr 2016; 10(2): 365−91.
Kanmounye US, Robertson FC, Sebopelo LA, Senyuy WP, Sichimba D, Keke C, et al. Bibliometric analysis of the 200 most cited articles in World Neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2021; 149: 226−31.
Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and or-ganization. Organ Res Methods 2015; 18(3): 429−72.
Al U, Soydal I. Comparison of bibliometric indicators for re-searchers in different subject fields. Scientometrics 2016; 108(3): 1507−24.
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehen-sive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017; 11(4): 959−75.
Kuntić V, Brborić J, Holclajtner-Antunović I, Uskoković-Marković S. Evaluating the bioactive effects of flavonoid hesperidin--a new literature data survey. Vojnosanit Pregl 2014; 71(1): 60−5.
Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia. Air quality programme of the Republic of Serbia for the period 2022-2030 with an action plan [Internet]. Serbia: Ministry of Environmental Pro-tection; 2022 [cited on 2024 Sept 12]. Available from: https://www.ekologija.gov.rs/sites/default/files/2023-03/en_
aq_programme_adopted_version.pdf
Moed HF. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. J Informetr 2010; 4(3): 265−77.