National survey on the use of telepsychology in the work of psychologists in Serbia
Abstract
Background/Aim. In recent decades, telepsychology has gradually developed due to the increasing availability of digital technologies. However, its expansion was led by the pandemic and the introduction of social distancing rules. The aim of this study was to determine the level of computer and internet use by psychologists in Serbia in their everyday work. Methods. A hybrid research design was employed, combining survey methodology with content analysis. The survey consisted of 70 questions related to the use of digital technology in the practice of psychologists. The national survey included 340 graduate psychologists of both sexes and all age categories. The participants worked in various regions of Serbia and covered nearly all areas of psychological practice, including healthcare, education, industry, the military, and private practice. Results. The questions addressed to psychologists when a respondent is sent for tests assessment most often related to personality exploration, diagnostic/neuropsychological assessments, and psychotherapy-related evaluations. In the total sample, as many as 51% of psychologists in Serbia conducted online therapy, while a significantly smaller number of respondents (17%) performed test assessments via the Internet. In assessments, the most frequently used tests were domestically produced and have been in use for a long time, while a smaller number of psychologists used new psychological instruments. The survey revealed that younger psychologists and those from Belgrade valued telepsychology more positively compared to older psychologists and those living and working in other areas. The therapeutic orientation of the respondents was not a significant factor in assessing the success of telepsychology. Conclusion. The paper provides an overview of the current situation in the area of personality assessment and shows that the use of digital technology and telepsychology in Serbia is more developed than the professional regulations and education of psychologists regarding this modality. For the widespread application of telepsychology in the work of psychologists, it is necessary to introduce topics related to this specific modality into the curricula of university courses, both globally and in Serbia.
References
American Psychological Association. Proposed Revision of Guide-lines for the Practice of Telepsychology [Internet]. Washing-ton, DC: APA; 2024 [accessed on 2025 April 22]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/telepsycholo gy-revision.pdf
Đurić-Jočić D, Pavlović V, Prica I. The use of telepsychotherapy in the work of psychologists. In: Dukanac V, Đurić M, Živanović D, editors. Proceedings: ALOPS 23 Vulnerabilities of the mo-dern age: the individual and the family. Beograd: Akademija za humani razvoj; 2024. p. 81–93. (Serbian)
Đurić-Jočić D. Psychological assessment of personality and writ-ing of findings. Beograd: Sinapsa edicije; 2023. p. 284. (Serbi-an)
American Psychological Association, Committee on Professional Stand-ards. Guidelines for computer-based tests and interpretations. Washington: The Association; 1986. p. 24.
Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS, Kuenneth CA, Cruz GM, Hales RE. Rural versus suburban primary care needs, utilization, and satisfac-tion with telepsychiatric consultation. J Rural Health 2007; 23(2): 163–5.
Ruggiero F, Zirone E, Mellace D, Capetti B, Molisso MT, Ferrucci R, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped telepsychol-ogy: Insights from an Italian survey. Internet Interv 2024; 38: 100764.
Lin L, Stamm KE, Ferenz K. Wright CV, Bethune S, Conroy J. Relationship between challenges with the use of telehealth and psychologists’ response during the coronavirus pandemic. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2022; 53(6): 596–605.
Wright J, Raiford SE. Essentials of Psychological Tele-assessment. New Jersey: Wiley&Sons; 2020. p. 320.
Parsons TD. Virtual reality for enhanced ecological validity and experimental control in the clinical, affective and social neu-rosciences. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9: 660.
Đurić-Jočić D, Pavlović V, Kolundžija Đ. Virtual reality and as-sessment of neurocognitive functions. Engrami 2024; 46(1) 1–13.
Kourtesis P, Collina S, Doumas LAA, MacPherson SE. Validation of the Virtual Reality Everyday Assessment Lab (VR-EAL): An Immersive Virtual Reality Neuropsychological Battery with Enhanced Ecological Validity. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2021; 27(2): 181–96.
Sauzéon H, Arvind Pala P, Larrue F, Wallet G, Déjos M, Zheng X, et al. The use of virtual reality for episodic memory assess-ment: effects of active navigation. Exp Psychol 2011; 59(2): 99–108.
Borgnis F, Baglio F, Pedroli E, Rossetto F, Uccellatore L, Oliveira JAG, et al. Available Virtual Reality-Based Tools for Execu-tive Functions: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 833136. Erratum in: Front Psychol 2022; 13: 995038.
Kirkham R, Kooijman L, Albertella L, Myles D, Yücel M, Rotaru K. Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Methods for Assessing Executive Functioning: Systematic Review. JMIR Serious Games 2024; 12: e50282.
Schönbrodt FD, Asendorpf JB. Virtual social environments as a tool for psychological assessment: Dynamics of interaction with a virtual spouse. Psychol Assess 2011; 23(1): 7–17.
Mühlberger A, Bülthoff HH, Wiedemann G, Pauli P. Virtual reali-ty for the psychophysiological assessment of phobic fear: re-sponses during virtual tunnel driving. Psychol Assess 2007; 19(3): 340–6.
McMinn MR, Buchanan T, Ellens BM, Ryan MK. Technology, professional practice, and ethics: Survey findings and implica-tions. Prof Psychol Res Pract 1999; 30(2): 165–72.
Von Below C, Bergsten J, Midbris T, Philips B, Werbart A. It turned into something else: patients' long-term experiences of transitions to or from telepsychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1142233.
Watson JD, Pierce BS, Tyler CM, Donovan EK, Merced K, Mallon M, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Psychologists' Telepsy-chology Uptake during the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pan-demic. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(8): 5467.
McIntire S, Miller L. Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006. p. 648.
Vodanovich SJ, Piotrowski C. Internet-based instruction: A na-tional survey of psychology faculty. J Instr Psychol 2001; 28(4): 253–6.
Hays SM, McCallum RS. A comparison of the pencil-and-paper and computer-administered Minnesota Multiphasic Personali-ty Inventory–Adolescent. Psychol Sch 2005; 42(6): 605–13.
Đurić-Jočić D, Leposavić I. Human figure drawing as a method of personality and psychopathology assessment. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju; 2018. p. 205. (Serbian)
Barnett JE, Serafim G, Sharara D. Telepsychology: Key recom-mendations for ethical, legal, and effective practice. Pract In-nov 2024; 9(2): 105–18.
Wright CV, Beattie SG, Galper DI, Church AS, Bufka LF, Bra-bender VM, et al. Assessment practices of professional psy-chologists: Results of a national survey. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2017; 48(2): 73–8.
Sablone S, Bellino M, Lagona V, Franco TP, Groicher M, Risola R, et al. Telepsychology revolution in the mental health care de-livery: a global overview of emerging clinical and legal issues. Forensic Sci Res 2024; 9(3): owae008.
