Clinical treatment of wounds using nano platelet-rich plasma
Abstract
Background/Aim. Chronic refractory wounds are hard-to-heal lesions that are susceptible to bacterial and other pathogenic infections, leading to additional tissue damage and a significant reduction in patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of nano platelet-rich plasma (PRP) – nano-PRP compared with conventional PRP in the clinical treatment of wounds. Methods. The study included a total of 96 patients with chronic refractory wounds, including wounds caused by trauma and pressure ulcers, admitted between June 2021 and June 2023. According to the treatment applied, the patients were divided into two groups: the observation group (OG) (n = 47) with nano-PRP treatment and the control group (CG) (n = 49) with conventional PRP treatment. Group differences were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Results. The overall treatment efficacy in the OG was significantly higher than that in the CG (p < 0.05). After treatment, the visual analog scale score decreased in both groups compared with baseline, with the OG showing significantly lower scores than the CG (p < 0.05). The wound healing rate was also significantly higher in the OG (p < 0.05). Moreover, nano-PRP-treated patients exhibited improved outcomes for scar hyperplasia and a shorter wound healing time relative to the conventional PRP-treated group (p < 0.05). Conclusion. Compared with conventional PRP, nano-PRP demonstrates superior wound healing efficacy in patients with chronic refractory wounds, is associated with greater pain relief, and results in improved aesthetic outcomes. These findings suggest that nano-PRP may represent a more effective therapeutic option than conventional PRP for the clinical management of difficult-to-heal wounds.
References
Frykberg RG, Banks J. Challenges in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015; 4(9): 560–82. DOI: 10.1089/wound.2015.0635.
Izadi M, Bozorgi M, Hosseine MS, Khalili N, Jonaidi-Jafari N. Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic wounds before and after treatment with medical ozone. Medicine (Bal-timore) 2018; 97(48): e12505. DOI: 10.1097/MD.000000000001250.
Wu J, Chen LH, Sun SY, Li Y, Ran XW. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: The dawn of diabetic wound healing. World J Diabetes 2022; 13(12): 1066–95. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1066.
Su YJ, Liang SH. Long-term mental health outcomes of severe burn injury: A 5-year follow-up of the 2015 Formosa Fun Coast Water Park fire disaster. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2022; 75: 10–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.01.007.
Das SS, Neelam, Hussain K, Singh S, Hussain A, Faruk A, et al. Laponite-based Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Curr Pharm Des 2019; 25(4): 424–43. DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666190402165845.
Katti KS, Jasuja H, Jaswandkar SV, Mohanty S, Katti DR. Nanoclays in medicine: a new frontier of an ancient medical practice. Mater Adv 2022; 3(20): 7484–500. DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00528j.
Stealey ST, Gaharwar AK, Zustiak SP. Laponite-Based Nano-composite Hydrogels for Drug Delivery Applications. Phar-maceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16(6): 821. DOI: 10.3390/ph16060821.
Liu B, Li J, Lei X, Miao S, Zhang S, Cheng P, et al. Cell-loaded injectable gelatin/alginate/LAPONITE® nanocomposite hy-drogel promotes bone healing in a critical-size rat calvarial de-fect model. RSC Adv 2020; 10(43): 25652–61. DOI: 10.1039/d0ra03040f.
Eriksson E, Liu PY, Schultz GS, Martins-Green MM, Tanaka R, Weir D, et al. Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus. Wound Repair Regen 2022; 30(2): 156–71. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12994. Erratum in: Wound Repair Regen 2022; 30(4): 536. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13035.
Hiremath SCS, Ahmed Z. Comparison of Two Entry Methods and Their Cosmetic Outcomes in Creating Pneumoperitone-um: A Prospective Observational Study. Surg J (N Y) 2022; 8(3): e239–44. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756182.
Vu NB, Nguyen HT, Palumbo R, Pellicano R, Fagoonee S, Pham PV. Stem cell-derived exosomes for wound healing: current status and promising directions. Minerva Med 2021; 112(3): 384–400. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.07205-5.
Bonkemeyer Millan S, Gan R, Townsend PE. Venous Ulcers: Di-agnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician 2019; 100(5): 298–305.
Roshangar L, Soleimani Rad J, Kheirjou R, Reza Ranjkesh M, Fer-dowsi Khosroshahi A. Skin Burns: Review of Molecular Mecha-nisms and Therapeutic Approaches. Wounds 2019; 31(12): 308–15.
Williams M. Wound infections: an overview. Br J Community Nurs 2021; 26(Sup6): S22–5. DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.Sup6.S22.
Swaney MH, Kalan LR. Living in Your Skin: Microbes, Mole-cules, and Mechanisms. Infect Immun 2021; 89(4): e00695–20. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00695-20.
Gupta S, Paliczak A, Delgado D. Evidence-based indications of platelet-rich plasma therapy. Expert Rev Hematol 2021; 14(1): 97–108. DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2021.1860002.
Fang J, Wang X, Jiang W, Zhu Y, Hu Y, Zhao Y, et al. Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in the Treatment of Diseases Associated with Orthopedic Injuries. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2020; 26(6): 571–85. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2019.0292.
Sharara FI, Lelea LL, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Moawad GN. A narrative review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in reproductive medicine. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38(5): 1003–12. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02146-9.
Carr BJ. Platelet-Rich Plasma as an Orthobiologic: Clinically Relevant Considerations. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2022; 52(4): 977–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2022.02.005.
Zhang J, Luo Q, Hu Q, Zhang T, Shi J, Kong L, et al. An injecta-ble bioactive dressing based on platelet-rich plasma and nanoclay: Sustained release of deferoxamine to accelerate chronic wound healing. Acta Pharm Sin B 2023; 13(10): 4318–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.11.006.
Yu Z, Li Y, Fu R, Xue Y, Zhao D, Han D. Platycodin D inhib-its the proliferation and migration of hypertrophic scar-derived fibroblasts and promotes apoptosis through a caspase-dependent pathway. Arch Dermatol Res 2023; 315(5): 1257–67. DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02513-1.
Kim YH, Yang X, Shi L, Lanham SA, Hilborn J, Oreffo ROC, et al. Bisphosphonate nanoclay edge-site interactions facilitate hydrogel self-assembly and sustained growth factor localiza-tion. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 1365. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15152-9.
Zhou L, Zhang C, Shi T, Wu D, Chen H, Han J, et al. Function-alized 3D-printed GelMA/Laponite hydrogel scaffold pro-motes BMSCs recruitment through osteoimmunomodulatory enhance osteogenic via AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. Ma-ter Today Bio 2024; 29: 101261. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101261.
Zhang Y, Wang ZL, Deng ZP, Wang ZL, Song F, Zhu LL. An extracellular matrix-inspired self-healing composite hydrogel for enhanced platelet-rich plasma-mediated chronic diabetic wound treatment. Carbohydr Polym 2023; 315: 120973. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120973.
Huang S, Hong X, Zhao M, Liu N, Liu H, Zhao J, et al. Nano-composite hydrogels for biomedical applications. Bioeng Transl Med 2022; 7(3): e10315. DOI: 10.1002/btm2.10315.
Fan F, Saha S, Hanjaya-Putra D. Biomimetic Hydrogels to Promote Wound Healing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9: 718377. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.718377.
Zhuang ZM, Wang Y, Xu FW, Guo K, Cao LL, Feng ZX, et al. Programmed nanozyme hydrogel enabling spatiotemporal modulation of wound healing achieves skin regeneration after biofilm infection. J Nanobiotechnology 2025; 23(1): 694. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03773-5.
Karimi Hajishoreh N, Dadashpour M, Akbarzadeh A. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of biological agents based on Zinc-laponite- curcumin incorporated in alginate hydrogel. J Biol Eng 2023; 17(1): 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-023-00391-3.
Gonzalez-Pujana A, Igartua M, Hernandez RM, Santos-Vizcaino E. Laponite nanoclays for the sustained delivery of therapeu-tic proteins. Eur J Pharm Sci 2024; 201: 106858. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106858.
