Analysis of the effect of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation on electroencephalography wave frequencies
Abstract
Background/Aim. Interest in the effects of electromagnetic fields on the human organism has grown significantly with the advent of digital mobile communication systems, which employ pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields. In standby mode, a mobile phone does not emit significant signal power, while during active communication, the intensity of the electromagnetic field may reach values of up to 250 mW. The aim of this study was to examine whether exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields affects the frequency of electroencephalography (EEG) waves. Methods. The study included 60 participants (30 males and 30 females). Each participant underwent two consecutive EEG recordings, each lasting approximately 20 min. The first EEG recording was performed at rest, without exposure to an electromagnetic field generator. This was followed by a second EEG recording while using a mobile phone for 10 minutes on one ear, then a break of about 2 minutes was made and the recording was repeated on the opposite ear, also for 10 minutes. A standard mobile phone was used as the source of the high-frequency electromagnetic field. Results. The analysis of EEG wave frequencies revealed no statistically significant differences in either sex before and after mobile phone exposure in the alpha, beta, or delta frequency bands. A change in the theta frequency band in female participants following mobile phone exposure was localized to the right hemisphere. Conclusion. Methodological limitations are the most likely reason for the absence of recorded changes in the majority of participants. The observed effects may be sufficiently subtle or infrequent to evade detection by standard EEG recordings. Therefore, the lack of observed changes cannot be interpreted as evidence that high-frequency electromagnetic fields have no effect on EEG activity.
References
Adey WR. Joint actions of environmental nonionizing elec-tromagnetic fields and chemical pollution in cancer promo-tion. Environ Health Perspect 1990; 86: 297–305. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9086297.
Arber SL, Lin JC. Microwave induced changes in nerve cells: effects of modulation and temperature. Bioelectromagnetics 1985; 6(3): 257–70. DOI:10.1002/bem.2250060306.
Bawin SM, Kaczmarek LK, Adey WR. Effects of modulated VHF fields on the central nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1975; 247: 74–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb35984.x.
Adey WR, Bawin SM. Brain interactions with weak electric and magnetic fields. Neurosci Res Prog Bull 1977; 15(1): 1–129.
Hermann DM, Hossmann KA. Neurological effects of micro-wave exposure related to mobile communication. J Neurol Sci 1997; 152(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(97)00140-8.
Eulitz C, Ullsperger P, Freude G, Elbert T. Mobile phones mod-ulate response patterns of human brain activity. Neuroreport 1998; 9(14): 3229–32. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199810050-00018.
Croft RJ, Chandler JS, Burgess AP, Barry RJ, Williams JD, Clarke AR. Acute mobile phone operation affects neural func-tion in humans. Clinical Neurophy 2002; 113(10): 1623–32. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00215-8.
Duffy FH. Brain electrical activity mapping: ideas and answer. In: Duffy FH, editor. Topographic mapping of brain electrical activity. Boston: Butter-worths; 1986. p. 401–98.
Reiser H, Dimpfel W, Schober F. The influence of electromag-netic fields on human brain activity. Eur J Med Res 1995; 1(1): 27–32.
Takashima S, Onaral B, Schwan HP. Effects of modulated RF energy on the EEG of mammalian brain. Radiat Environ Bio-phys 1979; 16(1): 15–27. DOI: 10.1007/BF01326893.
Mitchell DS, Switzer WG, Bronaugh EL. Hyperactivity and dis-ruption of operant behavior in rats after multiple exposures to microwave radiation. Radio Sci 1977; 12: 263–71. DOI: 10.1029/RS012i06Sp00263.
Croft RJ, Leung S, McKenzie RJ, Loughran SP, Iskra S, Hamblin DL, et al. Effects of 2G and 3G mobile phones on human al-pha rhythms: Resting EEG in adolescents, young adults, and the elderly. Bioelectromagnetics 2010; 31(6): 434–44. DOI: 10.1002/bem.20583.
Preece AW, Iwi G, Davies-Smith A, Wesnes K, Butler S, Lim E, et al. Effect of a 915 MHz simulated mobile phone signal on cognitive function in man. Int J Radiat Biol 1999; 75(4): 447–56. DOI: 10.1080/095530099140375.
Kramarenko VA, Tan U. Effects of high-frequency electro-magnetic fields on human EEG: A brain mapping study. Int J Neurosci 2003; 113(7): 1007–19. DOI: 10.1080/00207450390220330.
Zhang J, Sumich A, Wang GY. Acute effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field emitted by mobile phone on brain func-tion. Bioelectromagnetics 2017; 38(5): 329–38. DOI: 10.1002/bem.22052.
Prins AC, Baas K, van der Meer JN, Jacobs M, Nederveen AJ. The effect of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human resting state wake EEG and event-related potential: A sys-tematic review and meta-analysis. Bioelectromagnetics 2025; 46(1): e22531. DOI:10.1002/bem.22531.
Henz D, Schöllhorn WI, Poeggeler B. Mobile phone chips reduce increases in EEG brain activity induced by mobile phone-emitted electromagnetic fields. Front Neurosci 2018; 12: 190. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00190.
Vecsei Z, Knakker B, Juhász P, Thuróczy G, Trunk A, Hernádi I. Short-term radiofrequency exposure from new generation mobile phones reduces EEG alpha power with no effects on cognitive performance. Sci Rep 2018; 8(1): 18010. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36353-9.
Van der Meer JN, Eisma YB, Meester R, Jacobs M, Nederveen AJ. Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on brain waves in healthy volunteers. Sci Rep 2023; 13(1): 21758. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48561-z.
Danker-Hopfe H, Eggert T, Dorn H, Sauter C. Effects of RF-EMF on the human resting-state EEG—the inconsistencies in the consistency. Part 1: Non-exposure-related limitations of comparability between studies. Bioelectromagentics 2019; 40(5): 291–19. DOI: 10.1002/bem.22194.
Wei Y, Yang J, Chen Z, Wu T, Lv B. Modulation of resting-state brain functional connectivity by exposure to acute fourth-generation long-term evolution electromagnetic field: An fMRI study. Bioelectromagnetics 2019; 40(1): 42–51. DOI: 10.1002/bem.22165.
