Physiological tolerance to uncompensated heat stress in soldiers: effects of various types of body cooling systems
Abstract
Background/Aim. In military services, emergency situations when soldiers are exposed to a combination of nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) contamination combined with heat stress, are frequent and complex. In these specific conditions, usage of personal body cooling systems may be effective in reducing heat stress. The present study was conducted in order to evaluate the efficiency of four various types of contemporary personal body cooling systems based on the “Phase Change Material” (PCM), and its effects on soldiers’ subjective comfort and physiological performance during exertional heat stress in hot environments. Methods. Ten male soldiers were voluntarily subjected to exertional heat stress tests (EHSTs) consisted of walking on a treadmill (5.5 km/h) in hot conditions (40ºC) in climatic chamber, wearing NBC isolating impermeable protective suits. One of the tests was performed without any additional cooling solution (NOCOOL), and four tests were performed while using different types of cooling systems: three in a form of vests and one as underwear. Physiological strain was determined by the mean skin temperature (Tsk), tympanic temperature (Tty), and heart rate values (HR), while sweat rates (SwR) indicated changes in hydration status. Results. In all the cases EHST induced physiological response manifested through increasing Tty, HR and SwR. Compared to NOCOOL tests, when using cooling vests, Tty and Tsk were significantly lower (on 35th min, for 0.44 ± 0.03 and 0.49 ± 0.05ºC, respectively; p < 0.05), as well as the average SwR (0.17 ± 0.03 L/m2/h). When using underwear, the values of given parameters were not significantly different compared to NOCOOL tests. Conclusions. Using a body cooling system based on PCM in the form of vest under NBC protective clothes during physical activity in hot conditions, reduces sweating and alleviates heat stress manifested by increased core and skin temperatures and heart rate values. These effects directly improve heat tolerance, hydration state, decrease in the risk of heat illness, and extends the duration of soldiers’ exposure to extreme conditions.
References
Mekjavic IB, Banister EW, Morrison JB. Environmental Ergo-nomics. London: Taylor & Francis; 1987.
Donaldson GC, Keatinge WR, Saunders RD. Cardiovascular res-ponses to heat stress and their adverse consequences in healthy and vulnerable human populations. Int J Hyperthermia 2003; 19(3): 225−35.
Cian C, Barraud PA, Melin B, Raphel C. Effects of fluid ingestion on cognitive function after heat stress or exercise-induced dehydration. Int J Psychophysiol 2001; 42(3): 243−51.
Hadid A, Yanovich R, Erlich T, Khomenok G, Moran DS. Effect of a personal ambient ventilation system on physiological strain during heat stress wearing a ballistic vest. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 104(2): 311−9.
Montain SJ, Sawka MN, Cadarette BS, Quigley MD, Mckay JM. Physiological tolerance to uncompensable heat stress: effects of exercise intensity, protective clothing, and climate. J Appl Physiol 1994; 77(1): 216−22.
Krausman AS. Effects of wearing chemical protective clothing on task performance when using wearable input devices. Blacksburg: Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2004.
Teal W. Microclimate Cooling. Proceedings of the Chemical Biological Individual Protection Conference Massachusetts, USA; 2006 March 7−9; Massachusetts: US Army Natick Sol-dier Center; 2006.
Mottinger B. Phase Change Materials (PCMs) and Applications. Space Hardware Design Final Project. University of Colorado. 2003. Available from: http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/ASEN/asen5519/1999-Files
Radaković SS, Marić J, Šurbatović M, Raden S, Stefanova ED, Stanković N, et al. Effects of acclimation on cognitive perfor-mance in soldiers during exertional heat stress. Milit Med 2007; 172(2): 133−6.
Radaković SS, Marić J, Rubežić V, Šurbatović M, Raden S. Effects of acclimation on water and electrolitic disbalance in soldiers during exertional heat stress. Vojnosanit Pregl 2007; 64(3): 199−204. (Serbian)
ISO 12894: 2001 - Ergonomics of the thermal environment – Medical supervision of individuals exposed to extreme hot or cold environment. Available from: www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber [cited 2008 June 25].
ISO 9886: 2004 - Ergonomics evaluation of thermal strain by physiological measurements. Available from: www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber [cited 2008 June 25].
Selkirk GA, Mclellan TM. Influence of aerobic fitness and body fatness on tolerance to uncompensable heat stress. J Appl Physiol 2001; 91(5): 2055−63.
Nag PK, Ashtekar SP, Nag A, Kothari D, Bandyopadhyay P, Desai H. Human heat tolerance in simulated environment. Indian J Med Res 1997; 105: 226−34.
Newsham KR, Saunders JE, Nordin ES. Comparison of rectal and tympanic thermometry during exercise. South Med J 2002; 95(8): 804−10.
Technical Bulletin. Technical bulletin MED 507/AFPAM (I): 48−152. Washington, DC: Dept of the Army and Air Force; 2003.
Sawka MN, Latzka WA, Montain SJ, Cadarette BS, Kolka MA, Kraning KK, et al. Physiologic tolerance to uncompensable heat: intermittent exercise, field vs laboratory. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33(3): 422−30.
Cheung SS, McLellan TM. Heat acclimation, aerobic fitness, and hydration effects on tolerance during uncompensable heat stress. J Appl Physiol 1998; 84(5): 1731−9.
Ftaiti F, Grelot L, Coudreuse JM, Nicol C. Combined effect of heat stress, dehydration and exercise on neuromuscular func-tion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 84(1−2): 87−94.
