Value of bacterial culture of vaginal swabs in diagnosis of vaginal infections
Abstract
Bacground/Aim. Vaginal and cervical swab culture is still very common procedure in our country’s everyday practice whereas simple and rapid diagnostic methods have been very rarely used. The aim of this study was to show that the employment of simple and rapid diagnostic tools [vaginal fluid wet mount microscopy (VFWMM), vaginal pH and potassium hydroxide (KOH) test] offers better assessment of vaginal environment than standard microbiologic culture commonly used in Serbia. Methods. This prospective study included 505 asymptomatic pregnant women undergoing VFWMM, test with 10% KOH, determination of vaginal pH and standard culture of cervicovaginal swabs. Combining findings from the procedures was used to make diagnoses of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and vaginitis. In addition, the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) was determined in each sample and analyzed along with other findings. Infections with Candida albicans and Trichomonas vaginalis were confirmed or excluded by microscopic examination. Results. In 36 (6%) patients cervicovaginal swab cultures retrieved several aerobes and facultative anaerobes, whereas in 52 (11%) women Candida albicans was isolated. Based on VFWMM findings and clinical criteria 96 (19%) women had BV, 19 (4%) vaginitis, and 72 (14%) candidiasis. Of 115 women with BV and vaginitis, pH 4.5 was found in 5, and of 390 with normal findings 83 (21%) had vaginal pH 4.5. Elevated numbers of PMN were found in 154 (30%) women – in 83 (54%) of them VFWMM was normal. Specificity and sensitivity of KOH test and vaginal pH determination in defining pathological vaginal flora were 95% and 81%, and 79% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion. Cervicovaginal swab culture is expensive but almost non-informative test in clinical practice. The use of simpler and rapid methods as vaginal fluid wet mount microscopy, KOH test and vaginal pH offers better results in diagnosis, and probably in the treatment and prevention of sequels of vaginal infections.
References
Wiesenfeld HC, Macio I. The infrequent use of office-based di-agnostic tests for vaginitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181(1): 39−44.
Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, Davis CC, Islam MR, Forney LJ. Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Mi-crobiology 2004; 150(Pt 8): 2565−73.
Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Lillis R, Martin DH, Ferris MJ. Quantitative PCR assessments of bacterial species in women with and without bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48(5): 1812−9.
Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM. Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353(18): 1899−911.
Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Liu C, Matsen FA, Hoffman NG, Fiedler TL, et al. More than meets the eye: associations of vaginal bacteria with gram stain morphotypes using molecular phylogenetic analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8(10): e78633.
Hammerschlag MR, Alpert S, Rosner I, Thurston P, Semine D, McComb D, et al. Microbiology of the vagina in children: nor-mal and potentially pathogenic organisms. Pediatrics 1978; 62(1): 57−62.
Hammerschlag MR, Alpert S, Onderdonk AB, Thurston P, Drude E, McCormack WM, et al. Anaerobic microflora of the vagina in children. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 131(8): 853−6.
Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, Nansel TR, Yu K, Andrews WW. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vagino-sis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104(2): 267−72.
Jaquiery A, Stylianopoulos A, Hogg G, Grover S. Vulvovaginitis: clinical features, aetiology, and microbiology of the genital tract. Arch Dis Child 1999; 81(1): 64−7.
Larsen B, Monif GR. Understanding the bacterial flora of the female genital tract. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32(4): e69−77.
Donders GG, Vereecken A, Dekeersmaecker A, Van Bulck B, Spitz B. Wet mount microscopy reflects functional vaginal lactobacillary flora better than Gram stain. J Clin Pathol 2000;53(4):308-13.
Hemalatha R, Ramalaxmi BA, Swetha E, Balakrishna N, Mas-tromarino P. Evaluation of vaginal pH for detection of bacterial vaginosis. Indian J Med Res 2013; 138(3): 354−9.
Thulkar J, Kriplani A, Agarwal N. Utility of pH test & Whiff test in syndromic approach of abnormal vaginal discharge. Indian J Med Res 2010; 131:445-8.
Pavletic AJ, Hawes SE, Geske JA, Bringe K, Polack SH. Experience with routine vaginal pH testing in a family practice setting. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2004; 12(2): 63−8.
Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KC, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74(1): 14−22.
Donders GG, Vereecken A, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Salembier G, Spitz B. Definition of a type of abnormal vaginal flora that is distinct from bacterial vaginosis: aerobic vaginitis. BJOG 2002; 109(1): 34−43.
Hemalatha R, Ramalaxmi BA, Swetha E, Balakrishna N, Mas-tromarino P. Evaluation of vaginal pH for detection of bacterial vaginosis. Indian J Med Res 2013; 138(3): 354−9.
Sobel JD. Vaginitis. N Engl J Med 1997; 337(26): 1896−903.
Donders GG. Definition and classification of abnormal vaginal flora. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21(3): 355−73.
Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, van Simaey L, de Ganck C, et al. Comparison between Gram stain and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora: definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora. BMC Microbiology 2005; 5(1): 61.
Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, Mcculle SL, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(Suppl 1): 4680−7.
Brotman RM, Ravel J, Cone RA, Zenilman JM. Rapid fluctuation of the vaginal microbiota measured by Gram stain analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86(4): 297−302.
Zhou X, Brown CJ, Abdo Z, Davis CC, Hansmann MA, Joyce P, et al. Differences in the composition of vaginal microbial communities found in healthy Caucasian and black women. ISME J 2007; 1(2): 121−33.