Perceived parental acceptance/rejection, some family characteristics and conduct disorder in adolescents
Abstract
Background/Aim. Conduct disorder is characterized by repetitive and persistent presence of dissocial, aggressive and defiant behavioral patterns, thus represents important public issue with comprehensive and far-reaching consequences both for the individual and society. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in sociodemographic family characteristics and the prominence of parental acceptance/rejection dimensions in groups of adolescents with and without conduct disorder, as well as to examine the connection between parental acceptance/rejection dimensions and externalizing symptoms in the group of adolescents with conduct disorder. Methods. This research was conducted on 134 adolescents, aged 15 to 18, using the Parental Acceptance/Rejection Questionnaire (PARQ child), Youth Self-Report (YSR), and a questionnaire constructed for the purpose of this survey. Results. The results showed that the number of adolescents with conduct disorder coming from divorced families was significantly higher than from complete families (44.8% vs 13.4%, respectively; p < 0.001). Also, in this group of adolescents there was a statistically significantly higher number of parents suffering from psychiatric disorders compared to the controls (31.3% vs 8.9%; respectively; p = 0.001). The perceived rejection dimension and the total index of maternal acceptance/rejection were significantly higher in adolescents with conduct disorder than in those with no such disorder (132.30 ± 38.05 vs 93.91 ± 26.29 respectively; p < 0.001). Similar results were found for paternal acceptance/rejection dimension (129.40 ± 39.58 vs 86.10 ± 15.95 respectively; p < 0.001). Adolescents with conduct disorder and severe perceived maternal and paternal rejection showed a significantly higher average score on the subscale of externalizing symptoms (14.55 ± 4.45 and 13,27 ± 5,05) compared to adolescents with conduct disorder and lower total index of parental acceptance/rejection (8.32 ± 5.05 and 8.28 ± 5.08). Conclusion. The results suggest that adolescents with conduct disorder perceive their parents as more rejecting and less warm and supportive compared to adolescents without conduct disorder. The perception of significant and severe parental rejection was associated with a significantly higher averaged score on the subscale of externalizing symptoms in the group of adolescents with conduct disorder compared to those with no such disorder. It was found that adolescents with conduct disorder most often come from large families, have divorced parents or parents with multiple psychiatric disorders.
References
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneve: World Health Organization; 1992.
American Psychiatric Associacion. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington: American Psy-chiatric Association; 1994.
Moffitt TE. Life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited anti-social behavior: A 10-year research review and a research agenda. In: Lahey BB, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, editors. Causes of conduct disorders and juvenile delinquency. New York: Guil-ford Press; 2003. p. 49−75.
Moffitt TE, Caspi A. Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Dev Psychopathol 2001; 13(2): 335−75.
Piquero AR, Farrington DP, Blumstein A. Key Issues in Criminal Career Research: New Analyses of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
Loeber R, Burke JD, Lahey BB. What are adolescent antecedents to antisocial personality disorder. Crim Behav Ment Health 2002; 12(1): 24−36.
Piquero AR, Daigle LE, Gibson C, Piquero NL, Tibbetts SG. Re-search Note: Are Life-Course-Persistent Offenders At Risk for Adverse Health Outcomes. J Res Crime Delinq 2007; 44(2): 185−207.
Maughan B, Rutter M. Antisocial children grown up. In: Hill J, Maughan B, editors. Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge child and adolescent psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 507−52.
Rothbaum F, Weisz JR. Parental caregiving and child externaliz-ing behavior in nonclinical samples: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1994; 116(1): 55−74.
Frick PJ, Lahey BB, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Christ MA, Hanson K. Familial risk factors to oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: parental psychopathology and maternal parenting. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992; 60(1): 49−55.
Huurre T, Junkkari H, Aro H. Long-term psychosocial effects of parental divorce: a follow-up study from adolescence to adulthood. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2006; 256(4): 256−63.
Goldstein SE, Davis-Kean PE, Eccles JS. Parents, peers, and prob-lem behavior: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of rela-tionship perceptions and characteristics on the development of adolescent problem behavior. Dev Psychol 2005; 41(2): 401−13.
Rohner RP, Britner PA. Worldwide mental health correlates of parental acceptance-rejection: Review of cross-cultural and intracultural evidence. Cross-Cult Res 2002; 36: 16−47.
Rohner R, Khaleque A, Cournoyer DE. Introduction to Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory, methods, evidence, and implica-tions. 2009. [cited 2011 December 27]. Available from: http://www.cspar.uconn.edu/
Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Re-search Center for Children, Youth and Families; 2001.
Meltzer H, Gatward R, Goodman R, Ford T. Mental health of children and adolescents in Great Britain. Int Rev Psychiatry 2003; 15(1−2): 185−7.
Farrington DP. The integrated cognitive antisocial potential (ICAP) theory. In: Farrington DP, editor. Integrated Deve-lopmental and Life-Course Theories of Offending. New Brunswick: Transaction; 2005. p. 73−92.
Kim-Cohen J, Moffitt TE, Taylor A, Pawlby SJ, Caspi A. Maternal depression and children's antisocial behavior: nature and nur-ture effects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62(2): 173−81.
Muris P, Meesters C, Morren M, Moorman L. Anger and hostility in adolescents: Relationships with self-reported attachment style and perceived parental rearing styles. J Psychosom Res 2004; 57(3): 257−64.
Papazian B. Brief analytic essay on unconscious forces facilitat-ing transgenerational repetition of physical or sexual abuse. Psychiatr Enfant 1994; 37(2): 353−60. (French)
Bandura A. Social learning theory. New York: General Learn-ing Press; 1977.
Gallimore T. Unresolved Trauma: Fuel for the Cycle of Vi-olence and Terrorism. In: Stout C, editor. Psychology of Ter-rorism: Coping With the Continuing Threat. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2004. p. 67−93.
Ajduković M. The impact of neglect and abuse in the family on psychosocial development of children. Dijete i društvo 2001; 3(1−2): 59−75. (Serbian)
Muris P, Meesters C, van den Berg S. Internalizing and externalizing problems as correlates of self-reported attachment style and perceived parental rearing in normal adolescents. J Child Family Studies 2003; 12(2): 171−83.
Frick PJ, Cornell AH, Barry CT, Bodin DS, Dane HE. Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report of delin-quency. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2003; 31(4): 457−70.
Frick PJ, Marsee MA. Psychopathy and developmental path-ways to antisocial behavior in youth. In: Patrick CJ, editor. Handbook of psychopathy. New York: Guilford; 2006. p. 355−74.
Viding E, Blair JR, Moffitt TE, Plomin R. Evidence for substantial genetic risk for psychopathy in 7-year-olds. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2005; 46(6): 592−7.
Eremsoy CE. How do parental, familiar, and child characteristic differentiate conduct disorder children with and without psy-chopathic tendencie [thessis]. Ankara: Middle East Technical University; 2007.
Pardini DA, Lochman JE, Powell N. The development of callous-unemotional traits and antisocial behavior in children: are there shared and/or unique predictors J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2007; 36(3): 319−33.