Neobladder “Belgrade pouch”: Metabolic consideration

  • Vladimir Bančević Urology Clinic, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Predrag Aleksić Urology Clinic, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dusica Stamenkovic Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Military Medical Academy, Medical Faculty/ Univerisity of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Tomislav Pejcic Urology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia
  • Novak Milovic Urology Clinic, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Božidar Kovačević Institute for Pathology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Snežana Cerović Institute for Pathology, Military Medical Academy, Medical Faculty, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: urinary bladder neoplasms, urologic surgical procedures, colonic pouches, serbia, metabolism,

Abstract


Background/Aim. The ileal neobladder should be a low-pressure reservoir with acceptable volume and relatively small resorptive surface. A larger inner surface of the ileal pouch is associated with the high resorption of urine metabolites through intestinal mucosa and systemic metabolic disturbances, while a too small pouch results in a higher frequency of voiding and incontinency. The aim of this study was to investigate it is possible to create a neobladder from a shorter ileal segment compared to standard surgical techniques, and reduce metabolic complications. Methods. This prospective study included 77 male patients, scheduled for radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder derivation. The patients were divided into two groups: the standard pouch (SP) group of 37 patients scheduled for standard orthotopic neobladder, using a 50−70 cm long terminal ileum segment; the “Belgrade pouch” (BP) group of 40 patients scheduled for original,  orthotopic urinary reservoir, using a 25−35 cm long terminal ileum segment. We measured neobladder capacity, acidosis, base excess and bicarbonate concentration in the postoperative month 3rd, 6th, 12th and 15th. Results. At the end of the study, the patients from the SP group had much higher neobladder capacity than the natural bladder − 750 mL (range 514−2,050 mL); in contrast, the patients from the BP group had average capacity of 438 mL (range 205−653 mL) (p < 0.001). At the end of the study, there were more patients with acidosis (37.8% : 2.5%), base excess (35.1% : 7.5%) and low bicarbonate level (40.5% : 20.0%) in the SP group, than in the BP group, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion. “Belgrade pouch”, make from 25−35 cm long terminal ileum segment may obtain adequate capacity and lower rate of metabolic disturbances than standard, high capacity orthotopic neobladders.

Author Biography

Vladimir Bančević, Urology Clinic, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defence, Belgrade, Serbia
Dept of Urology

References

Coffey RC. Phisiologic implantation of the severed ureter or common bileduct into the intestine. JAMA 1911; 56(6): 397.

Chin JL. The quest for a better bladder from bowel. Eur Urol 2011; 59(4): 524−5.

Witjes JA, Compérat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, et al. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol 2014; 65(4): 778−92.

Stein JP, Skinner DG. Orthotopic urinary diversion. In: Walsh P, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology, 8th ed. Philadelphia: W.b. Saunders; 2002. p. 3835−64.

Hautmann RE, Egghart G, Frohneberg D, Miller K. The ileal neobladder. J Urol 1988; 139(1): 39−42.

Kulkarni JN, Pramesh CS, Rathi S, Pantvaidya GH. Long-term results of orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2003; 91(6): 485−8.

Burkhard FC, Kessier TM, Mills R, Studer UE. Continent uri-nary diversion. Cit Rev Oncol Hem 2006; 57(3): 255−64.

Thurairaja R, Burkhard FC, Studer UE. The orthotopic neobladder. BJU Int 2008; 102(9 Pt B): 1307−13.

Hautmann RE, Botto H, Studer UE. How to obtain good results with orthotopic bladder substitution: the 10 commandments. Eur Urol Suppl 2009; 8: 712–7.

Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M, Kessler TM, Thoeny H, Fleischmann A, et al. Twenty years experience with an ileal or-thotopic low pressure bladder substitute-lessons to be learned. J Urol 2006; 176(1): 161−6.

Sevin G, Soyupek S, Armağan A, Hoşcan MB, Oksay T. Ileal or-thotopic neobladder (modified Hautmann) via a shorter detu-bularized ileal segment: experience and results. BJU Int 2004; 94(3): 355−9.

Constantinides C, Manousakas T, Chrisofos M, Giannopulos A. Or-thotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy: 5 years of experience with nowel personal modification of the ileal pouch. J Urol 2001; 166(2): 532−7.

Bančević V, Aleksić P, Milović N, Košević B, Čampara Z, Stamenković D. Post-voiding residual urine and capacity increase in orthotopic urinary diversion-standard vs. modified technique. Vojnosanit Pregl 2010; 67(7): 558−61. (Serbian)

Aleksic P, Bancevic V, Milovic N, Kosevic B, Stamenkovic DM, Karanikolas M, et al. Short ileal segment for orthotopic neobladder: a feasibility study. Int J Urol 2010; 17(9): 768−73.

Stein JP, Dunn MD, Quek ML, Miranda G, Skinner DG. The or-thotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: experience with 209 pa-tients. J Urol 2004; 172(2): 584−7.

Fletcher S, Dhrampal A. Acid-Base Balance and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis. Surgery (Oxford) 2003; 21(3): 61−5.

Fujisawa M, Nakamura I, Yamanaka N, Gotoh A, Hara I, Okada H, et al. Changes in calcium metabolism and bone deminerali-zation after orthotopic intestinal neobladder creation. J Urol 2000; 163(4): 1108−11.

Published
2017/03/20
Section
Original Paper