ЗНАЧАЈ ИНАТА У ЕКОНОМСКОЈ АНАЛИЗИ ПАРНИЦЕ
Ključne reči:
инат, парница, поравнање, економска анализа
Sažetak
Предмет овог рада јесте инат, као појам и посебна друштвена преференција и инаџијско понашање. Рад разматра значај ината и његове импликације у анализи парничног поступка и избора између суђења и поравнања. Инат и инаџијско понашање се посматрају из угла различитих дисциплина економске науке (бихевиористичке и експерименталне економије, економске анализе праве), као и психологије и еволуционе биологије. Примат се даје дефиницији ината из бихевиористичко-економског аспекта, као спремности на наношење штете другом по цену сношења сопствених трошкова. У раду се приказују статистички подаци о броју парничних поступака у Србији, заједно са упоредним подацима, и притом се расправљају могуће импликације ината, односно инаџијског понашања на број парничних поступака. Рад поставља концептуални оквир за даља емпиријска истраживања ината и његовог значаја у доношењу одлуке о покретању парничног поступка и/или избора између суђења и поравнања како би се добио одговор на питање да ли грађани Србије воле да се парниче и која је улога ината у томе.
Reference
Almakias, S. Weiss, A. (2012). Ultimatum Game Behavior in Light of Attachment Theory. Journal of Economic Psychology. 33(3). 515-526.
Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy. 97(6). 1447-1458.
Andreoni, J. Miller, Ј. (2002). Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Rationality of Altruism. Econometrica. 70(2). 737-753.
Bolton, G. Ockenfels, A. (2000). A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition. The American Economic Review. 90(1). 166-193.
Cooter, R. Marks, S. Mnookin, R. (1982). Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior. The Journal of Legal Studies. 11(2). 225-251.
Cross, F. (2000). In Praise of Irrational Plaintiffs. Cornell Law Review. 86(1). 1-32.
Cullis, J. Jones, P. Soliman, A. (2012). ‘Spite effects’ in Тax Еvasion Еxperiments. Journal of Socio-Economics. 41(4). 418-423.
Dufwenberg, M. Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior. 47(2). 268-298.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2018). European Judicial Systems Efficiency and Quality of Justice. Cepej Studies No. 26.
Falk, A. Fehr, E. Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions. Econometrica. 73(6). 2017-2030.
Falk, A. Fehr, E. Fischbacher, U. (2008). Testing Тheories of Fairness – Intentions Matter. Games and Economic Behavior. 62(1). 287-303.
Falk, А. Fischbacher, U. (2005). Modeling Strong Reciprocity. In Gintis, H. Bowles, S. Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (Ed.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 193-214.
Fehr, E. Fischbacher, U. (2002). Why social preferences matter: The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. The Economic Journal. 112(478). C1-C33.
Fehr, E. Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 114(3). 817-868.
Fehr, E. Schmidt, K. (2006). The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories. In Kolm, S-K. Ythier, J.M. (Ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Elsevier. 1. 1-886.
Fehr, Е. Fischbacher, U. (2005). The Economics of Strong Reciprocity. In Gintis, H. Bowles, S. Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (Ed.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 151-192.
Gardner, A. West, S.A. (2004). Spite and the Scale of Competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 17(6). 1196-1203.
Gintis, H. (2000). Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 206(2). 169-179.
Guth, W. van Damme, E. (1998). Information, Strategic Behavior, and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 42(2-3). 227-247.
Hamburger, H. (1979). Games as Models of Social Phenomena. San Francisco: W H Freeman & Co.
Hamilton, W.D. (1970). Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model. Nature. 228. 1218-1220.
Harrison, J.L. (2018). Spite: Legal and Social Implications. Lewis & Clark Law Review. 22(3). 991-1026.
http://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/86209/Inat-kao-srpski-brend
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/spite
https://www.the-scientist.com/research/spite-evolution-finally-gets-nasty-49213
Jolls, C. Sunstein, C. Thaler, R. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. Stanford Law Review. 50. 1471-1550.
Jovanović, B. (2008a). Psihologija inata. Polja – časopis za književnost i teoriju. 2008(454). 116-122.
Kirchsteiger, G. (1994). The Role of Envy in Ultimatum Games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 25(1994). 373-389.
Lehmann, L. Bargum, K. Reuter, M. (2006). An Evolutionary Analysis of the Relationship Between Spite and Altruism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 19(5). 1507-1516.
Levine, D. (1998). Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics. 1(3). 593-622.
Marcus, D.K. Zeigler-Hill, V. Mercer, S.H. Norris, A.L. (2014). The Psychology of Spite and the Measurement of Spitefulness. Psychological Assessment. 26(2). 563-574.
Мarcus, D.K. Norris, A.L. (2016). Spite. In Zeigler-Hill, V. Marcus, D.K. (Ed.). The Dark Side of Personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Offerman, T. (2002). Hurting Hurts More than Helping Helps. European Economic Review. 46(8).1423-1437.
Orr, H.A. (2009). Fitness and Its Role in Evolutionary Genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 10. 531-539.
Paulhus, D.L, Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality. 36(6). 556-563.
Pillutla, M. Murnighan, K. (1996). Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 68(3). 208-224.
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. American Economic Review. 83(5). 1281-1302.
Ramseyer, J.M. Rasmusen, E.B. (2013). Are Americans More Litigious? Some Quantitative Evidence. In Buckley, F.H. (Ed.). The American Illness. Essays on the Rule of Law. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Roth, A.E. Prasnikar, V. Okuno-Fujiwara, M. Zamir, M.S. (1991). Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study. The American Economic Review. 81(5). 1068-1095.
Shabad, P. (2000). Giving the devil his due: Spite and the struggle for individual dignity. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 17. 690-705.
Trebješanin, Ž. (2001). Rečnik psihologije. Beograd: Stubovi kulture.
West, S. Griffin, S. Gardner, A. (2007). Social Semantics: Altruism, Cooperation, Mutualism, Strong Reciprocity and Group Selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 20(2). 415-432.
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
Zamir, Е. Teichman, D. (2008). Behavioral Law and Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Žunić Pavlović, V. Kovačević Lepojević, M. (2011). Prevalencija i razvoj poremećaja ponašanja u detinjstvu. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija (Beograd). 10(4). 725-742.
Беговић, Б. Лабус, М. Јовановић, А. (2013). Економија за правнике. Београд: Правни факултет Универзитет у Београду.
Годишњи извештаји Врховног касационог суда о раду судова, https://www.vk.sud.rs/sr-lat/godi%C5%A1nji-izve%C5%A1taj-o-radu-sudova
Јовановић, Б. (2008б). Пркос и инат: етнопсихолошке студије. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
Клајн, И. Шипка, М. (2008). Велики речник страних речи и израза, Нови Сад: Прометеј.
Рот, Н. (2010). Основи социјалне психологије. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy. 97(6). 1447-1458.
Andreoni, J. Miller, Ј. (2002). Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Rationality of Altruism. Econometrica. 70(2). 737-753.
Bolton, G. Ockenfels, A. (2000). A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition. The American Economic Review. 90(1). 166-193.
Cooter, R. Marks, S. Mnookin, R. (1982). Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior. The Journal of Legal Studies. 11(2). 225-251.
Cross, F. (2000). In Praise of Irrational Plaintiffs. Cornell Law Review. 86(1). 1-32.
Cullis, J. Jones, P. Soliman, A. (2012). ‘Spite effects’ in Тax Еvasion Еxperiments. Journal of Socio-Economics. 41(4). 418-423.
Dufwenberg, M. Kirchsteiger, G. (2004). A Theory of Sequential Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior. 47(2). 268-298.
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2018). European Judicial Systems Efficiency and Quality of Justice. Cepej Studies No. 26.
Falk, A. Fehr, E. Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions. Econometrica. 73(6). 2017-2030.
Falk, A. Fehr, E. Fischbacher, U. (2008). Testing Тheories of Fairness – Intentions Matter. Games and Economic Behavior. 62(1). 287-303.
Falk, А. Fischbacher, U. (2005). Modeling Strong Reciprocity. In Gintis, H. Bowles, S. Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (Ed.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 193-214.
Fehr, E. Fischbacher, U. (2002). Why social preferences matter: The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives. The Economic Journal. 112(478). C1-C33.
Fehr, E. Schmidt, K. (1999). A theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 114(3). 817-868.
Fehr, E. Schmidt, K. (2006). The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories. In Kolm, S-K. Ythier, J.M. (Ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Elsevier. 1. 1-886.
Fehr, Е. Fischbacher, U. (2005). The Economics of Strong Reciprocity. In Gintis, H. Bowles, S. Boyd, R. and Fehr, E. (Ed.). Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 151-192.
Gardner, A. West, S.A. (2004). Spite and the Scale of Competition. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 17(6). 1196-1203.
Gintis, H. (2000). Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 206(2). 169-179.
Guth, W. van Damme, E. (1998). Information, Strategic Behavior, and Fairness in Ultimatum Bargaining: An Experimental Study. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 42(2-3). 227-247.
Hamburger, H. (1979). Games as Models of Social Phenomena. San Francisco: W H Freeman & Co.
Hamilton, W.D. (1970). Selfish and Spiteful Behaviour in an Evolutionary Model. Nature. 228. 1218-1220.
Harrison, J.L. (2018). Spite: Legal and Social Implications. Lewis & Clark Law Review. 22(3). 991-1026.
http://www.politika.rs/sr/clanak/86209/Inat-kao-srpski-brend
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/spite
https://www.the-scientist.com/research/spite-evolution-finally-gets-nasty-49213
Jolls, C. Sunstein, C. Thaler, R. (1998). A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics. Stanford Law Review. 50. 1471-1550.
Jovanović, B. (2008a). Psihologija inata. Polja – časopis za književnost i teoriju. 2008(454). 116-122.
Kirchsteiger, G. (1994). The Role of Envy in Ultimatum Games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 25(1994). 373-389.
Lehmann, L. Bargum, K. Reuter, M. (2006). An Evolutionary Analysis of the Relationship Between Spite and Altruism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 19(5). 1507-1516.
Levine, D. (1998). Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments. Review of Economic Dynamics. 1(3). 593-622.
Marcus, D.K. Zeigler-Hill, V. Mercer, S.H. Norris, A.L. (2014). The Psychology of Spite and the Measurement of Spitefulness. Psychological Assessment. 26(2). 563-574.
Мarcus, D.K. Norris, A.L. (2016). Spite. In Zeigler-Hill, V. Marcus, D.K. (Ed.). The Dark Side of Personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Offerman, T. (2002). Hurting Hurts More than Helping Helps. European Economic Review. 46(8).1423-1437.
Orr, H.A. (2009). Fitness and Its Role in Evolutionary Genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics. 10. 531-539.
Paulhus, D.L, Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality. 36(6). 556-563.
Pillutla, M. Murnighan, K. (1996). Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 68(3). 208-224.
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics. American Economic Review. 83(5). 1281-1302.
Ramseyer, J.M. Rasmusen, E.B. (2013). Are Americans More Litigious? Some Quantitative Evidence. In Buckley, F.H. (Ed.). The American Illness. Essays on the Rule of Law. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Roth, A.E. Prasnikar, V. Okuno-Fujiwara, M. Zamir, M.S. (1991). Bargaining and Market Behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An Experimental Study. The American Economic Review. 81(5). 1068-1095.
Shabad, P. (2000). Giving the devil his due: Spite and the struggle for individual dignity. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 17. 690-705.
Trebješanin, Ž. (2001). Rečnik psihologije. Beograd: Stubovi kulture.
West, S. Griffin, S. Gardner, A. (2007). Social Semantics: Altruism, Cooperation, Mutualism, Strong Reciprocity and Group Selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 20(2). 415-432.
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
Zamir, Е. Teichman, D. (2008). Behavioral Law and Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Žunić Pavlović, V. Kovačević Lepojević, M. (2011). Prevalencija i razvoj poremećaja ponašanja u detinjstvu. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija (Beograd). 10(4). 725-742.
Беговић, Б. Лабус, М. Јовановић, А. (2013). Економија за правнике. Београд: Правни факултет Универзитет у Београду.
Годишњи извештаји Врховног касационог суда о раду судова, https://www.vk.sud.rs/sr-lat/godi%C5%A1nji-izve%C5%A1taj-o-radu-sudova
Јовановић, Б. (2008б). Пркос и инат: етнопсихолошке студије. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
Клајн, И. Шипка, М. (2008). Велики речник страних речи и израза, Нови Сад: Прометеј.
Рот, Н. (2010). Основи социјалне психологије. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
Objavljeno
2020/08/25
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Pregledni članak