LAWFUL LIMITATION OF THE RIGHT TO WORK IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FRIES JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Sažetak
The present paper examines two main recent issues of the social policy of the European Union (EU). The legal basis of the analysis includes some of the most significant areas of labour law and social law in the European Union. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently has decided some cases regarding the fundamental rights of workers based on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and these judgments can mostly raise several concerns related to the interpretation of these rights. It is important that the CJEU has such judgments and it is of high importance that fundamental social rights are considered in these cases. Although, the subject of this paper is the judgment C-190/16, the reasoning and conclusions on the following pages apply to not only this case but also in general regarding the right to work and the prohibition of age discrimination. The lawful or unlawful limitation of these fundamental rights are highlighted because nowadays they mean more than meets the eye, keeping in mind the labour market challenges in the European Union. Consequently, the CJEU has come to important conclusions that have to be interpreted in the context of the recent changes of the social policy of the EU. The paper contains a short outline of the national case and the judgment of the CJEU. The main part of the paper consists of a merit analysis with comments and criticism concerning the limitation to the two emphasised fundamental rights. Conclusions are also included highlighting the importance of the right to work and equal employment in the social and employment policy of the European Union focusing mainly on the freedom to choose an occupation.
Reference
Gyula Berke: “Az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartájának alkalmazása munkajogi (szociálpolitikai) ügyekben”, HR & Munkajog, 11/2013, 8-14.
Massimiliano Delfino, “The Court and the Charter – A »Consistent« Interpretation of Fundamental Social Rights and Principles”, European Labour Law Journal, 1/2015, 86-99.
Stefano Guibboni, “Social Rights and Market Freedom in the European Constitution: A Re-Appraisal”, European Labour Law Journal, 2/2010, 161-184.
Tamás Gyulavári, Gábor Kártyás, “Effective international enforcement of employee rights? Challenging Hungarian ‘unorthodox’ laws”, European Labour Law Journal, 2/2018, 116-143.
Frank Hendrickx, “The European Social Pillar: A first evaluation”, European Labour Law Journal, 1/2018, 3-6.
Frank Hendrickx, “Editorial: The European pillar of social rights – Interesting times ahead”, European Labour Law Journal, 3/2017, 191-192.
Bob Hepple, “Fundamental Social Rights since the Lisbon Treaty”, European Labour Law Journal, 2/2011, 150-154.
Antoine Jacobs, “Labour Law, Social Security Law and Social Policy After the Entering Into Force of the Treaty of Lisbon”, European Labour Law Journal, 2/2011, 119-141.
Nóra Jakab, “On the significance of the employee status and of the personal scope of labour law regulation”, Novi Sad Faculty of Law Collected Papers, 3/2016. 989-1001.
Edit Kajtár, Franz Marhold, “The Principle of Equality in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Age Discrimination”, European Labour Law Journal, 4/2015, 321-342.
György Kiss, Alapjogok kollíziója a munkajogban, JUSTIS, Pécs 2010.
Virginia Mantouvalou, “Are Labour Rights Human Rights?”, European Labour Law Journal, 2/2012, 151-172.
Veronica Papa, “The Dark Side of Fundamental Rights Adjudication? The Court, the Charter and the Asymmetric Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in the AMS Case and Beyond”, European Labour Law Journal, 3/2015, 190-214.
Sara Iglesias Sánchez, “The Court and the Charter: The Impact of the Entry into Force of the Lisbon Treaty on the ECJ’s Approach to Fundamental Rights”, Common Market Law Review, 5/2012, 2565-2611.
Dagmar Schiek, “The ECJ Decision in Mangold: A Further Twist on Effects of Directives and Constitutional Relevance of Community Equality Legislation”, Industrial Law Journal, 3/2006, 329-341.
Christophe Vigneau, “7. Freedom to Choose an Occupation and Right to Engage in Work (Article 15)”, European Labour Law and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (ed. Brian Bercusson), Nomos, Baden-Baden 2006.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation.
European Pillar of Social Rights, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/social-summit-european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en.pdf, 30 July 2018.
C-284/15. Office national de l'emploi (ONEm) v M and M v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) and Caisse auxiliaire de paiement des allocations de chômage (CAPAC) [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:220.
C-332/13. Weigel v Nemzeti Innovációs Hivatal (ECLI: EU: C:2014:31)
C-614/12. and C-10/13. joined cases Dutka v Mezogazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal and Sajtos vs Budapest Főváros VI. Kerületi Önkormányzata (ECLI: EU: C:2014:30)
C-488/12., C-489/12., C-490/12., C-491/12. and C-526/12. joined cases Nagy v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal, Böszörményi Gálóczhi-Tömösváry and Szabadosné Bay v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejélesztési Hivatal, Ványai v Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatala (ECLI: EU: C:2013:703).
C-190/16. Werner Fries v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH [2017] ECLI:EU:C:2017:513.
C-236/09. Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres [2011] I 00773.
C-286/12. European Commission v Hungary [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:687.
C-141/11. Torsten Hörnfeldt v Posten Meddelande AB [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:421
C-45/09. Gisela Rosenbladt v Oellerking Gebäudereinigungsges. mbH [2010] I 09391.
C-341/08. Domnica Petersen v. Berufungsausschuss für Zahnärzte für den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe [2007] ECR I 0047.