Основни кораци у развоју јавне управе у Мађарској
Sažetak
After a brief outline of the past, the study focuses on the three main elements of public administration: the organization, the tasks and competences and the characteristics of the staff.
Different but complementary research methods (historical, comparative and dogmatic) show the changes in the management and operation of official administration over historical periods. The formalized, subordinated public administration is increasingly replaced by a customer friendly, service-like administration. The corresponding organizational framework is the government window system, while the institutions the Act of General Administrative Procedures provide the opportunity to implement fast, cheap and efficient services. The commitment, skills, and professionalism of the public administration staff remain the most important factor for the realisation of a modern, service-oriented state.
Changes in the nature of official administration is not straight-line, but the tendency is the strengthening of the help and service image.
Reference
1. Almássy, Gy.,Development of Public Administration and Technology, Ph.D. Thesis, Budapest, 2012, p. 55.
2. Árva, Zs., Balázs, I., Barta, A., and Veszprémi, B., Public Administration Theory, 2nd Edition, Debrecen: University Press, 2012, p. 193.
3. Balázs, I., Changes in Public Administration in Hungary and Europe form the Change of Regime to the Present Day, Debrecen: University Press, 2011, p. 59.
4. Balázs, I., ‘Alternatives of Organising State Services by Administrative Authorities’ 2015, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol, 8, no. 3, pp. 2-13.
5. Barta, A., Territorial State Administration in Hungary, Budapest: Gondolat, 2013, pp. 133-136.
6. Barta, A. ‘Changes of Territorial State Administration 201-2014’ 2014, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol.7, no. 4, pp. 1-8.
7. Barta, A., ‘Intergation Processes for Territorial Administration in 2015’, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 14-20.
8. Berényi, S., Szamel, L., Baracka, R., and Ivancsics I., Hungarian State Administration Law. General Chapter, Budapest: Ministry of Home Affaires, 1984, pp. 138-153.
9. Boros, A., ‘The Third Generation of the Hungarian Administrative Procedural Law is Ákr. (I)’ 2018, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-8.
10. Csizmadia, A., Bureaucracy and Administrative Reforms in Hungary, Budapest: Gondolat, 1979, pp. 8-9.
11. Demmke, C., ‘Governmental, Organisational and Individual Performance’, 2006, Eipascope, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5-12.
12. Dudas, F., ‘Effective Information, Improving, by means of e-public administration, the level of information provided to cliens, with special regard to call centers’ 2004a, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 12.
13. Dudas, F., ‘Administrative Costumer Support Charter’, 2004b, Notary and Public Administration, vol, 6, no. 4, pp. 6-7.
14. Dudas, F., Improvement of the Administrative Service System in the Light of a Survey’ 2004c Notary and Public Administration, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 11-15.
15. Dudas, F., ‘On Improving of the Performance of the Public Administration’2006, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 8, no.3, pp. 10-11.
16. Fonyó, Gy.,Handbook of Local Councillors, Budapest: MTTH, 1985, pp. 25-61.
17. Gajduschek, Gy.,Civil Service. Personnel and Personnel System of Hungarian Administration in the Light of Empirical Data, Budapest, 2008, p. 176.
18. General Administrative Order, Ákr. 2016—Ket. 2014, (ed.) Juhász, Z., Budapest, Wolters Kluwer, 2017, pp. 223-227.
19. Hajas, B., at al, Rules of Administrative Procedure I. Explanation of General Administrative Order, (ed.) Petrik, F., Budapest: HVG ORAC, 2017, pp. 27-28.
20. Imre, S., ‘The Influence of Offices on the Public’, in Martonffy (ed.), Hungarian Public Administration Nowadays, The Path of Modern Public Service 2,. Lectures of the 1936 Continuing Education Course, Hungarian Royal State Publisher, 1936, pp. 27-44.
21. Kasza, M., Mezey, L., Mitták, T., ‘Three Blows to the Clerks’ I-II. 2015, Notary and Public Administration, vol.17, no. 5. pp. 16-24.
22. Kilényi, G., Commentary on the Administrative Procedure Act, Budapest: Complex Wolters, 2009, pp. 23-33.
23. Kiss P., ‘De-Government and /or Municipal Empowerment in the Village? How to Continue Local Administration? Questions of the Division of Powers between District and Local Authorities.’ 2015, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 17, Special issue, pp. 5-7.
24. Koltányi, G., ‘Carrier Model in the Serve of the Public’ 2013, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 5-7.
25. Lőrincz, L., Basic Instituion of Public Administration, Budapest: HVG ORAC, 2010, pp. 172-175.
26. Magyary, Z., The Rationalisation of Hungarian Public Administration, Budapest: Royal Hungarian University Press, 1930, p. 167.
27. Magyary, Z., Hungarian Public Administration, Budapest: Royal Hungarian University Press, 1942.
28. Magyary Zoltán Public Administration Development Program (MP 11.0) Ministry for Public Administration and Justice, Budapest, 10 June 2011.
29. Martonffy, K., The Renewal of Hungarian Public Administration, Royal Hungarian University Press, 1940.
30. Pálné Kovács, I., ‘Difficulties in Reforming the Middle Level’ 2006, Hungarian Public Administration, vol. 56, no. 3-4, p. 228.
31. Pálné Kovács, I.’Transformation of Local Government System and Territorial Administration’ 2010-2013, MTA Law Working Paper 2014/2. (Online) at http://jog.tk.mta.hu/mtalwp, accessed on September 1st, 2019.
32. Pilz, T., ‘Organization and Opoeration of the CaÍpital Offices and County Government Offices’ AROP-1.1.26-2013-0001 Training of Government Office Staff, Manucript, pp. 24-25.
33. Soós, G., Local Government Institutionalization in Hungary, Frankfurt am Main, Academic Research: 2015, pp. 31-75.
34. Szabó, L., ‘The Goal is to Serve Costumer Better’ 2004, Notary and Public Administration, vol.6, no. 2, p. 20.
35. Szabó, L., ‘New Law to Serve Costumers’ 2005, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6-7.
36. Szekeres, A., ‘Changes in the Notary’s Administrative Powers’ 2012, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 5-7.
37. Toth, Z., ‘Characteristics of Service State in the Administrative Procedures Act’ 2005, Notary and Public Adminsitration, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5-7.
38. Zöld Nagy, V., ‘Districts and Formation of Districts Offices’, 2012, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4-5.
Act IV of 1957 on General Rules of Administrative Procedure
Act of 1957 as amended by Act of 1981 Law
Act XXIII of 1992 on the Status of Civil Servants
Government decree No.1113/2003. (XI. 11.) Korm. on the Modernization of Administrative Services
Act of CXL of 2004 on General Rules of Administrative Proceedings and Services
Government decree No 1191/2010. (IX.14.) Korm. on the Transformation of the Territorial Administration
Act LVIII of 2010 on the Status of Government Officials
Act CXCIX of 2011 on Civil Servants
Act CLXXXVI of 2015 on Changes to the Law Related to the Reduction of Administrative Bureaucracy
2016/123 EC Directive on Market Services
Act CL of 2016 on General Public Administration Procedure
Act CL of 2016 on General Administrative Order
Act LII of 2016 on State Officials
Government Decree No. 86/2019 (IV. 23.) Korm. on Capital, County Goverenment Offices and District (discrict capital) Offices
Act CXXVof 2018 on Government Administration
http://www.kormany.hu/download/8/42/40000/Közigazgatás_fejlesztesi¬_stratégia_pdf accessed on 2nd September 2018.
2. Árva, Zs., Balázs, I., Barta, A., and Veszprémi, B., Public Administration Theory, 2nd Edition, Debrecen: University Press, 2012, p. 193.
3. Balázs, I., Changes in Public Administration in Hungary and Europe form the Change of Regime to the Present Day, Debrecen: University Press, 2011, p. 59.
4. Balázs, I., ‘Alternatives of Organising State Services by Administrative Authorities’ 2015, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol, 8, no. 3, pp. 2-13.
5. Barta, A., Territorial State Administration in Hungary, Budapest: Gondolat, 2013, pp. 133-136.
6. Barta, A. ‘Changes of Territorial State Administration 201-2014’ 2014, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol.7, no. 4, pp. 1-8.
7. Barta, A., ‘Intergation Processes for Territorial Administration in 2015’, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 14-20.
8. Berényi, S., Szamel, L., Baracka, R., and Ivancsics I., Hungarian State Administration Law. General Chapter, Budapest: Ministry of Home Affaires, 1984, pp. 138-153.
9. Boros, A., ‘The Third Generation of the Hungarian Administrative Procedural Law is Ákr. (I)’ 2018, New Hungarian Public Administration, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-8.
10. Csizmadia, A., Bureaucracy and Administrative Reforms in Hungary, Budapest: Gondolat, 1979, pp. 8-9.
11. Demmke, C., ‘Governmental, Organisational and Individual Performance’, 2006, Eipascope, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5-12.
12. Dudas, F., ‘Effective Information, Improving, by means of e-public administration, the level of information provided to cliens, with special regard to call centers’ 2004a, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 12.
13. Dudas, F., ‘Administrative Costumer Support Charter’, 2004b, Notary and Public Administration, vol, 6, no. 4, pp. 6-7.
14. Dudas, F., Improvement of the Administrative Service System in the Light of a Survey’ 2004c Notary and Public Administration, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 11-15.
15. Dudas, F., ‘On Improving of the Performance of the Public Administration’2006, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 8, no.3, pp. 10-11.
16. Fonyó, Gy.,Handbook of Local Councillors, Budapest: MTTH, 1985, pp. 25-61.
17. Gajduschek, Gy.,Civil Service. Personnel and Personnel System of Hungarian Administration in the Light of Empirical Data, Budapest, 2008, p. 176.
18. General Administrative Order, Ákr. 2016—Ket. 2014, (ed.) Juhász, Z., Budapest, Wolters Kluwer, 2017, pp. 223-227.
19. Hajas, B., at al, Rules of Administrative Procedure I. Explanation of General Administrative Order, (ed.) Petrik, F., Budapest: HVG ORAC, 2017, pp. 27-28.
20. Imre, S., ‘The Influence of Offices on the Public’, in Martonffy (ed.), Hungarian Public Administration Nowadays, The Path of Modern Public Service 2,. Lectures of the 1936 Continuing Education Course, Hungarian Royal State Publisher, 1936, pp. 27-44.
21. Kasza, M., Mezey, L., Mitták, T., ‘Three Blows to the Clerks’ I-II. 2015, Notary and Public Administration, vol.17, no. 5. pp. 16-24.
22. Kilényi, G., Commentary on the Administrative Procedure Act, Budapest: Complex Wolters, 2009, pp. 23-33.
23. Kiss P., ‘De-Government and /or Municipal Empowerment in the Village? How to Continue Local Administration? Questions of the Division of Powers between District and Local Authorities.’ 2015, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 17, Special issue, pp. 5-7.
24. Koltányi, G., ‘Carrier Model in the Serve of the Public’ 2013, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 5-7.
25. Lőrincz, L., Basic Instituion of Public Administration, Budapest: HVG ORAC, 2010, pp. 172-175.
26. Magyary, Z., The Rationalisation of Hungarian Public Administration, Budapest: Royal Hungarian University Press, 1930, p. 167.
27. Magyary, Z., Hungarian Public Administration, Budapest: Royal Hungarian University Press, 1942.
28. Magyary Zoltán Public Administration Development Program (MP 11.0) Ministry for Public Administration and Justice, Budapest, 10 June 2011.
29. Martonffy, K., The Renewal of Hungarian Public Administration, Royal Hungarian University Press, 1940.
30. Pálné Kovács, I., ‘Difficulties in Reforming the Middle Level’ 2006, Hungarian Public Administration, vol. 56, no. 3-4, p. 228.
31. Pálné Kovács, I.’Transformation of Local Government System and Territorial Administration’ 2010-2013, MTA Law Working Paper 2014/2. (Online) at http://jog.tk.mta.hu/mtalwp, accessed on September 1st, 2019.
32. Pilz, T., ‘Organization and Opoeration of the CaÍpital Offices and County Government Offices’ AROP-1.1.26-2013-0001 Training of Government Office Staff, Manucript, pp. 24-25.
33. Soós, G., Local Government Institutionalization in Hungary, Frankfurt am Main, Academic Research: 2015, pp. 31-75.
34. Szabó, L., ‘The Goal is to Serve Costumer Better’ 2004, Notary and Public Administration, vol.6, no. 2, p. 20.
35. Szabó, L., ‘New Law to Serve Costumers’ 2005, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6-7.
36. Szekeres, A., ‘Changes in the Notary’s Administrative Powers’ 2012, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 5-7.
37. Toth, Z., ‘Characteristics of Service State in the Administrative Procedures Act’ 2005, Notary and Public Adminsitration, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5-7.
38. Zöld Nagy, V., ‘Districts and Formation of Districts Offices’, 2012, Notary and Public Administration, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4-5.
Act IV of 1957 on General Rules of Administrative Procedure
Act of 1957 as amended by Act of 1981 Law
Act XXIII of 1992 on the Status of Civil Servants
Government decree No.1113/2003. (XI. 11.) Korm. on the Modernization of Administrative Services
Act of CXL of 2004 on General Rules of Administrative Proceedings and Services
Government decree No 1191/2010. (IX.14.) Korm. on the Transformation of the Territorial Administration
Act LVIII of 2010 on the Status of Government Officials
Act CXCIX of 2011 on Civil Servants
Act CLXXXVI of 2015 on Changes to the Law Related to the Reduction of Administrative Bureaucracy
2016/123 EC Directive on Market Services
Act CL of 2016 on General Public Administration Procedure
Act CL of 2016 on General Administrative Order
Act LII of 2016 on State Officials
Government Decree No. 86/2019 (IV. 23.) Korm. on Capital, County Goverenment Offices and District (discrict capital) Offices
Act CXXVof 2018 on Government Administration
http://www.kormany.hu/download/8/42/40000/Közigazgatás_fejlesztesi¬_stratégia_pdf accessed on 2nd September 2018.
Objavljeno
2021/01/11
Rubrika
Originalni naučni rad