Central European preparation for the European integration, lessons for the Western Balkans, in particular Serbia

  • Zsolt László Becsey Károli Reformist University, Budapest
Keywords: CEFTA, EU accesion, current account, Visegrad, Central Europe

Abstract


In addition to the author’s scientific work, the study -based on pragmatic experiences  -analyzes  the factors that characterized Central European countries before the change of regime (1990) and then the foreign economic model through which Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia reached EU membership in 2004. The study highlighted that ,with different depths, in all countries concerned  economic policies were characterized by liberal bankruptcy regulations and strict conditions of competition, so that they could  prove their ability to meet the condition of a functioning market economy for EU membership  . The export-oriented model, built on  efficient inflow of foreign direct investment and high-tec in the early 1990s, was implemented by the late 1990s to demonstrate that these states were ready to meet another condition of EU membership , namely to meet the challenges of the internal market. This transformation represented a problem for the current account balance in the 1990s (mainly due to the loss of traditional national export capacities) only in the middle of the decade, and it was only at the end of the decade that trade balances became active with the EU. The total external equilibrium of the Visegrad countries was maintained  by the fact that the inflow of FDI had not yet started to conclude in the withdrawal of profits from recent investments in Central Europe, and the countervailing effect of EU net transfers, which began to arrive  later paralelly with the start of the withdrawal of FDI dividends. The CEFTA co-operation concluded in 1992 followed the economic liberalization timetable  of that of the Visegrad Four with the EU paralelly, but did not go beyond its depth for  political prudence, thus providing full opening to each other only after and through EU membership, concretely the liberalisation  in services or in sensitive agricultural trade. The CEFTA treaty was expanded to the Balkans after 1995 and has been and is a good example for countries that do not want to stay in an ex-Soviet or ex-Yugoslav economic integration, but is a good method to prepare for the earliest possible EU membership. Therefore, in the preparation of the Serbian EU acession, it is worthwhile to study the Visegrad experience and lessons - a decade before membership

References

1. Adam,Antonis- Kosma,Theodora S. - McHugh, Jimmy: Trade-Liberalization Strategies: What Could Southeastern Europe Learn from the CEFTA and BAFTA? IMF Studies, 03/239, 2003.
2. Berend, T. Iván-Ránki, György: The Development of Central and Eastern Europe in the 19th Century, Economics and Law Publishing House, Budapest, 1976
3. Blahó, András-János Szita, János: Economic Cooperation of Socialist Countries in the Framework of the CMEA, MKKE, Textbook Publisher, 1984.
4. Becsey,Zsolt : The weight of opening to the East in the Hungarian foreign economy. Polgári Szemle,Budapest, 2014 / 1-2.
5. Bod ,Péter Ákos: Hungarian economic policy between 1989 and 2019. Economy and Finance, Budapest,March 6, 2019
6. Domonkos,Endre: The economic history of Central and Eastern Europe between the two world wars. Apostrophe,Budapest, 2017.
7. Domonkos,Endre: Economic History of Central and Eastern Europe between 1945-53, Apostrophe, 2019.
8. European Commission: Economic Forecast, Autumn 2015
9. Farkas,Beáta: Market economies in the European Union. Akadémiai Kiadó, 2017.
10.Gagrain Institute: Can CEFTA membership be a lifeboat for Georgia and Ukraine in the illiberal world order? February 2019 https://gagrainstitute.org/cefta-eu-enlargement-safeboat-for-georgia-and-ukraine
11.Gerőcs,Tamás - Pinkasz,András: Conflicting interest in the Comecon Integration East Central Europe (45), Leiden, 2018.
12. Gray, Gvain: Poland-European Tiger. Euromoney Publications, 1995.
13. Horváth,Jenő - Paragi, Beáta - Csicsmann, László: History of International Relations, 1941-1991, József Antall Knowledge Center, Budapest,2014.
14. Jeszenszky,Géza: An attempt to remedy the Trianon trauma. Osiris, 2016.
15.Kiss, Judit: Hungary’s agricultural trade with CEFTA .Hungarian Academy of Sciences World Economic Research Institute Challenges No. 131, Budapest,August 2000.
16. Kolodko, Grzegorz W.: Ten years of post-socialist transformation - lessons from economic policy reforms. Economic Review, Budapest, March 2000.
17.Kozma,Ferenc: Foreign Economic Strategy, Aula, Budapest, 2001.
18. Köves,András: From COMECON trade to EU accession. Economic Review, Budapest, July – August 2003 (pp. 635–653)
19.Mostetschnig, Anna Maria The Cefta and the Single Market, College of Europe, Natolin, 2011.
20.Oblath,Gábor: Foreign trade exchange rates, gross domestic real income and gross domestic product. Changes and levels in international comparison. KRTK-KTI, Budapest,2019/17.
21. OECD ,Economic Studies, Hungary 1997, OECD, 1997.
22. Pogátsa,Zoltán: The political economy of Hungary. Osiris, Budapest,2016.
23. Program of the Antall Government . 1990. Antall government's foreign policy program. https://www.parlament.hu/naplo34/005/0050004.html
24. Renewable Europe - Statistical Database, 1990-2001. KSH, Budapest,2003.
25. Réti,Tamás: Trade in Central Europe , Economic Survey,Budapest, January 2000
26. Rosati,Dariusz (ed.): New Europe - Report on transformation. Institute of Wschodni, Warsaw,2005.
27. Schultz, Siegfried : Countries in transition and GATT / WTO: Issues, expectations, prospects, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 121, Deutsches Institut für
Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin.1995
28.Siljak, Dzenita: Challenges and opportunities for the CEFTA countries, Institute of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Economics, Budapest,09/2019.
29.World Integrated Trade Solutions, World Bank. https://wits.worldbank.org/
Published
2022/06/09
Section
Professional Paper