Слобода судијског изражавања у Босни и Херцеговини

  • Igor M Milinković Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci
Ključne reči: слобода изражавања, инструменти за заштиту људских права, судије, ограничења, непристрасност, друштвене мреже, судијска етика

Sažetak


Слобода изражавања представља фундаментално људско право, заштићено основним међународним инструментима о људским правима и националним уставима. Право на слободу изражавања третира се као један од кључних елемената демократског друштва и од суштинског је значаја за остваривање људског достојанства. Међутим, наведено право нема апсолутни карактер и може се, под одређеним условима, подвргнути ограничењима, на шта указују и одредбе Европске конвенције о људским правима, као и пракса Европског суда за људска права.

Судије такође уживају право на слободу изражавања. Иако се учешће судија у расправама о питањима од јавног интереса сматра веома значајним, нарочито када је у питању регулисање статуса судства, природа судијске функције налаже ограничавање слободе изражавања носилаца судијске функције, у циљу очувања повјерења јавности у судску власт и њеног угледа. Јавно изражавање личних ставова може изазвати дилеме у погледу непристрасности судије. У раду ће бити указано на значај заштите слободе изражавања судија, али и на неопходност и легитимност њеног ограничавања. Испитаће се законске одредбе којима се регулише право на слободу изражавања судија у Босни и Херцеговини, као и примјери из праксе дисциплинских органа који се односе на остваривање наведеног права. Законска рјешења усвојена у Босни и Херцеговини биће упоређена са одредбама усвојеним у другим земљама и подвргнута критичкој евалуацији.

Biografija autora

Igor M Milinković, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci

Redovni profesor

Šef Katedre za državnopravne nauke

Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banjoj Luci

 

Reference

Attila Badó, “’Fair” Selection of Judges in Modern Democracies”, Fair Trial and Judicial Independence: Hungarian Perspectives (ed. Attila Badó), Springer, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London 2013, 27-58.


Eric Barendt, “Freedom of Expression”, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (eds. Michel Rosenfeld, András Sajó), Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012, 891-908.


David Brink, “Millian principles, freedom of expression, and hate speech”, Legal Theory 7.2/2001, 118-157.


Sandra Coliver, “The Right of Access to Information Held by Public Authorities”, Regardless of Frontiers: Global Freedom of Expression in a Troubled World (eds. Lee C. Bollinger, Agnés Callamard, Columbia University Press, New York 2021, 57-79.


Sietske Dijkstra, S, “The Freedom of the Judge to Express his Personal Opinions and Convictions under the ECHR”, Utrecht Law Review 13.1/2017, 1-17.


Charles R.M. Dlamini, “Towards a regional protection of human rights in Africa: the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights”, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa24.2/1991, 189-203.


María Elósegui, „The Independence of the Judiciary in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights”, The Rule of Law in Europe: Recent Challenges and Judicial Responses (eds. María Elósegui, Alina Miron, Iulia Motoc), Springer, Cham 2021, 69-87.


Peter Gilles, “Germany: Judicial Independence and the Involvement of Judges in Party Politics and Trade Union Activities”, Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate (eds. Shimon Shetreet, Jules Dechenes), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht – Boston – Lancaster 1985, 96-116.


Daniel Halliday, Helen McCabe, “John Stuart Mill on Free Speech”, The Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology (eds. David Coady, James Chase), Routledge, London – New York 2019, 71-87.


Richard Gittleman, “The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: A Legal Analysis”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 22.4/1982, 667-714.


Alan Haworth, Free Speech, Routledge, London – New York 1998.


Jannika Jahn, “Social Media Communication by Judges: Assessing Guidelines and New Challenges for Free Speech and Judicial Duties in the Light of the Convention”, The Rule of Law in Europe: Recent Challenges and Judicial Responses (eds. María Elósegui, Alina Miron, Iulia Motoc), Springer, Cham 2021, 137-153.


Matthew Kramer, Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2021.


David Klein, Lawrence Baum, Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections”, Political Research Quarterly 54.4/2001.


Richard Moon, The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Expression, University of Toronto Press, Toronto – Buffalo – London 2000.


Roy Peled, Yoram Rabin, The constitutional right to information”, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 42/2010, 357-401.


William A. Schabas, The European convention on human rights: a commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.


Anja Seibert-Fohr, “Judges’ Freedom of Expression and Their Independence: An Ambivalent Relationship”, The Rule of Law in Europe: Recent Challenges and Judicial Responses (eds. María Elósegui, Alina Miron, Iulia Motoc), Springer, Cham 2021, 89-110.


Jörg Philipp Terhechte, “Judicial Ethics for a Global Judiciary – How Judicial Networks create their own codes of conduct”, German Law Journal 10.4 /2009, 501-514.


Robert Trager,  Donna L. Dickerson, Freedom of Expression in the 21st Century, SAGE Publications, 1999.


Dirk Voorhoof, Hannes Cannie, “Freedom of Expression and Information in a Democratic Society", International Communication Gazette 72.4-5/2010, 407-423.


Jacob Weinrib, “What is the Purpose of Freedom of Expression”, University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 67/2009, 165-190.


 


*  *  *


 


Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, ECtHR (2001), https://www.lawpluralism.unimib.it/en/oggetti/153-association-ekin-v-france-no-39288-98-e-ct-hr-third-section-17-july-2001


Baka v. Hungary, Application no. 20261/12, ECtHR (2016), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-163113%22]}


Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany (https://www.btg-bestellservice.de/pdf/80201000.pdf)


Buscemi v. Italy, Application no. 29569/95, EctHR, 1999, https://jurinfo.jep.gov.co/normograma/compilacion/docs/pdf/CASE%20OF%20BUSCEMI%20v.%20ITALY.PDF.


Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (https://www.ustavnisud.ba/ public/down/USTAV_ BOSNE_I_HERCEGOVINE_engl.pdf)


Constitution of the Republic of North Macedonia (https://www.sobranie.mk/the-constitution-of-the-republic-of-macedonia-ns_article-constitution-of-the-republic-of-north-macedonia. nspx)


Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 1/94, 13/97, 16/02, 22/02, 52/02, 60/02, 18/03, 63/03, 9/04, 20/04, 33/04, 71/05, 72/05, 88/08.


Constitution of the Italian Republic (https://www.senato.it/documenti/repository/ istituzione/costituzione_inglese.pdf)


Constitution of the Republic of Srpska, Official Gazette of Republic Srpska, no. 6/92, 8/92, 15/92, 19/92, 21/92, 28/94, 8/96, 13/96, 15/96, 16/96, 21/96, 21/02, 26/02, 69/02, 31/03, 98/03, 115/05, 117/05, 48/11.


Constitution of the Slovak Republic (https://www.prezident.sk/upload-files/46422.pdf)


Cumhuriyet Vakfi and Others v. Turkey, Application no. 28255/07, ECtHR (2014), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-126797%22]}


Decision no. 04-02-897-3/2013, the Second Degree Disciplinary Commission of the B&H HJPC, https://vstv.pravosudje.ba/vstvfo/B/141


European Charter on the statute for judges (https://rm.coe.int/16807473ef)


General Comment No. 34, Article 19, Freedoms of opinion and expression. UN Doc. CCPR/ C/GC/34, Article 11, UN Human Rights Committee (2011) (https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no34-article-19-freedoms-opinion-and)


Miller v. Carroll, The court of Appeals of the State of Wiskonsin, 2019, https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/court-of-appeals/2019/2017ap002132.html


Opinion no. 3 on ethics and liability of judges, CCJE (2002) ( https://rm.coe.int/16807475bb)


Opinion no. 25 on freedom of expression of judges, CCJE (2022), (https://www.coe.int/en/web/ccje/ccje-opinions-and-magna-carta)


Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe: „ Judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities“ (https://rm.coe.int/16807096c1)


The African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, https://www.achpr.org/legalinstruments/detail?id=49


The American Convention on Human Rights (chromeextension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladda cbdfmadadm/https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201144/volume-1144-i-17955-english.pdf)


The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct (https://www.unodc.org /pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf)


The Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-independence-judiciary)


The Code of Judicial Ethics of Bosnia and Herzegovina (https://vstv.pravosudje.ba/)


The Convention on the Rights of the Child (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child)


The European Convention on Human Rights (https://www.ustavnisud.ba/en/european-convention-on-human-rights)


The German Judiciary Act (https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_drig/englisch _drig.html)


The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights)


The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial)


In re the Paternity of B. J. M.: Miller v. Carroll, The Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2020, (доступно https://law.justia.com/cases/wisconsin/supreme-court/2020/2017ap002132.html


The Judiciary System Act of the Republic of Bulgaria (http://www.vss.justice.bg/ en/root/f/upload/5/judiciary_system_act.pdf)


The Law on Courts of Brcko District, Official Gazette of Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 12/20 – refined text.


The Law on Courts of the FB&H (Official Gazette of the FB&H, no. 38/2005, 22/2006, 63/2010, 72/2010 - correction, 7/2013, 52/2014, and 85/2021)


The Law on Courts of the Republic of Srpska – unofficial refined text (https://www.vladars.net/sr-sp-cyrl/vlada/ministarstva/mpr/Documents/закон%20о%20 судовима%20рс,%20интегрални%20 текст-.pdf)


The Law on Courts of the Republic of Croatia, Official Gazette, no. 28/13, 33/15, 82/15, 82/16, 67/18, 126/19, 130/20, 21/22, and 60/22.


The Law on Freedom of Access to Information, Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 28/00, 45/06, 102/09, 62/11, and 100/13.


The Law on Freedom of Access to Information, Official Gazette of the FB&H, no. 32/01 and 48/11.


The Law on Freedom of Access to Information, Official Gazette of the Republic of Srpska, no. 20/01.


The Law on High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council, Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 25/2004, 93/2005, and 48/2007.


The Law on Protection against Defamation of the Brcko District, Official Gazette of the Brcko District, no. 14/2003.


The Law on Protection against Defamation of the FB&H, Official Gazette of the FB&H, no. 59/2002, 19/2003 and 73/2005.


The Law on Protection against Defamation of the Republic of Srpska, Official Gazette of the Republic of Srpska, no. 37/2001.


The Statute of the Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina (chrome-extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/https://skupstinabd.ba/images/dokumenti/ba/statut-brcko-distrikta.pdf)


The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights)


Todorova v. Bulgaria, Application no. 40072/13, ECtHR (2021), https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22display%22:[2],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22002-13441%22]%7D


 

Objavljeno
2023/06/12
Rubrika
Originalni naučni rad