Determinants of capital structure: An empirical study on Vietnamese listed firms
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the capital structure of listed Vietnamese companies in an updated context of financial development (the recent situation of domestic equity and debt capital market). By applying Random Effect model for panel data, we analyze 05 firm-specific and 01 country-specific determinants of capital structure based on the data set of 228 firms listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange during the period 2010 – 2014. The results indicated that The Pecking Order theory better explains the financing behaviors of Vietnamese listed firms. Accordingly, although in recent years, Vietnam’s equity market and corporate debt capital market have evolved considerably, the capital structure of Vietnamese companies are still dominated by the use of short-term financing sources. High-growth firms or large-sized firms still rely heavily on external debt rather than equity issuance while State-owned enterprises (SOE) are reported to have positive association with the use of long-term financing sources. This study proposed some recommendations to the policymakers in two dimensions: improving the efficiency and role of capital markets to mitigate the reliance on short-term funds and ensuring that bank finance is allocated on a commercial basis.
References
Asian Development Bank. (2014). Asia Bond Monitor - September 2014. from http://www.adb.org/publications/asia-bond-monitor-september-2014
de Jong, A.D., Kabir, R., & Nguyen, T.T. (2007). Capital Structure around the World: The Roles of Firm- and Country- Specific Determinants. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32 (9), 1954-1969.
Drobetz, W., & Fix, R. (2005). What are the Determinants of the Capital Structure? Some Evidence for Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 141 (1), 71-133.
Homaifar, G., Zietz, J., & Benkato, O. (1994). An Empirical Model of Capital Structure: Some new Evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21 (1), 1-14.
Jensen, M.C. (1986). Agency costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, 76 (2), 323-329.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Menagerial behavior, Agency costs and the ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305-360.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M.H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48 (3), 261-297.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M.H. (1963). Corporate Income Tax and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53 (3), 433-443.
Myers, S.C. (1984). The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39 (3), 575-592.
Myers, S.C., & Majluf, N.S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (2), 187-221.
Nguyen, D.T.T., Diaz-Rainey, I., & Gregorious, A. (2014). Financial Development and the Determinants of Capital Structure in Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 31 (3), 412-431.
Nguyen, T.D.K., & Ramachandran, N. (2006). Capital Structure in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: The case of Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 23 (2), 192-211.
Okuda, H., & Lai, T.P.N. (2012). Capital Structure and Investment Behavior of Listed Companies in Vietnam: An Estimation of the Influence of Government Ownership. International Journal of Business and Information, 7 (2), 137-164.
Titman, S., & Wessels, R. (1988). The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice. Journal of Finance, 43 (1), 1-19.
ViettinBankSc. (2013). Industry Report: Commercial banking in Vietnam. from http://www.vietinbanksc.com.vn/News/2013/11/30/294174.aspx#
Wald, J.K. (1999). How firm characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Research, 22 (2), 161-187.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.