The impact of training on operational performance: the case of the customs service at Nikola Tesla airport in Belgrade

  • Sanja Dalton Faculty of organizational sciences

Abstract


In this paper the impact of risk analysis and assessment training of the customs officers on improvement of their operational performances at Nikola Tesla airport in Belgrade is presented. The aim of the research is to measure the perception of the customs officers at the airport about the operational effectiveness of the risk analysis training program. The research was conducted through survey, by collecting data from the questionnaire disseminated to the customs officers who were divided into experimental (the officers who attained the training) and control group (the officers who have not attained the training). Both groups of the officers evaluated the statements about their performance contribution in effective collection of revenue, facilitation of trade and passengers, border control and protection level and reputation of the customs unit at the airport. The results of the research show that there is a significant difference between the groups, which confirms the hypothesis that the risk analysis and assessment training has a positive impact on the customs officers’ operational efficiency.

References

Adeniji, A.A., Osibanjo, O.A., & Abiodun, A.J. (2013). Organizational change and human resource management interventions: an investigation of Nigerian banking industry. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2),139-154.

Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, London, UK: Kogan Page, Ltd.

Beh, Loo-See., & Loo, Leap-Han. (2013). Human resource management best practices and firm performance: a universalistic perspective approach. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2),135-167.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. London: Pearson.

Gilley, J. W., & Maycunich, A. (2000). Beyond the Learning Organization: Creating a Culture of Continuous Growth and Development through State-Of-The-Art Human Resource Practices. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

Hameed, A., & Waheed, A. (2011). Employee Development and Its Affect on Employee Performance Framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2 (13), 224-229.

Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resources architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment and resource configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4), 517-543.

Mahyuddin, M. Y. (2009). The Effectiveness of Training in the Public Service, American Journal of Scientific Research, 6 (2009), 39-51.

Management as a Competitive Tool in Europe, working paper, London: Henley College.

Mura, L. (2012). Performance of Human Resource Management in an internationally operating company. Serbian Journal of Management, 7(1),115-129.

Niazi. A.S., (2011). Training and Development Strategy and Its Role in Organizational Performance, Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 1(2),42-57.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research &evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Salas. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Kraiger K. (2012). The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice, University of Center Florida.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

Sims, R. (2002). Organizational Success through Effective Human Resources Management. Westport CT: Quorum Books.

Sims, R. S. (2006). Human Resource Development: Today and Tomorrow. IAP.

Stavrou, E., Brewster, C., & Charalambous, C. (2004). Human Resource.

Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R.. (1998). In-depth interviewing. Introduction to qualitative research methods: a guidebook and resource, 87-116.

Published
2016/10/12
Section
Original Scientific Paper