Challenges in the introduction of AGVS in production lines: case studies in the automotive industry
Abstract
Increasing customers´ requirements together with the current trend of digitization in the spirit of Industry 4.0 puts pressure on manufacturing companies to increase both the flexibility and the performance of their manufacturing and logistic processes. This work presents the challenges in the introduction of AGV (Automatically Guided Vehicles) technology in production lines through two case studies from two different countries, Portugal and the Czech Republic. Both companies are from the automotive industry. Case study research aims to explore and understand complex phenomena. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the limitations and necessary conditions that must be considered when implementing AGV technology for automating selected logistic processes. Based on the data collected through multiple observations, a three-phase methodology considering technological, organizational and safety aspects is proposed as the main output. The basic scheme also includes the proposal of some critical success factors and key performance indicators that should be monitored in order to evaluate the efficiency of implementing this technology in future projects.
References
Arifin, R., & Egbelu, P. (2000). Determination of vehicle requirements in automated guided vehicle systems: A statistical approach. Production Planning & Control, 11 (3), 258–270.
Damašková, G., Nedjalkov, L., Novotný, J., & Vierik, J. (2017). Implementation of AGV as a pilot logistic project in selected company. Logistic course – seminar work. Zlín, Czech Republic: TBU in Zlín.
Farling, B.E., Mosier, C.T., & Mahmoodi, F. (2001). Analysis of automated guided vehicle configurations in flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 39 (18), 4239–4260.
Ganesharajah, T., Hall, N.G., & Sriskandarajah, C. (1998). Design and operational issues in AGV-served manufacturing systems. Annals of Operations Research, 76, 109–154.
Hrbáčková, L. (2016). Risk-based thinking in the production process using the Methods of Quality Assurance Matrix and the FMEA process. Journal of System Integration, 7 (1), 1–28.
Hu, C.H., & Egbelu, P.J. (2000). A framework for the selection of idle vehicle home locations in an automated guided vehicle system. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (3), 543–562.
Kesen, S.E., & Baykoç, O.F. (2007). Simulation of automated guided vehicle (AGV) systems based on just-in-time (JIT) philosophy in a job-shop environment. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15 (3), 272–284.
Kodym, O., Sedlacek, M., & Kavka, L. (2016). Information support for logistic modelling. Proceedings of the 2016 17th International Carpathian Control Conference. ICCC 2016, 335–340.
Lazányi, K. (2017). Innovation: The role of trust. Serbian Journal of Management, 12 (2), 331–344.
Lee, J., Choi, R., & Khaksar, M. (1990). Evaluation of automated guided vehicle systems by simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 19 (1–4), 318–321.
LR Intralogistik. (2017, May 10). Automatisierter Routenzug mit dem Still LiftRunner® [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=L0gIUHnB8qs
O’Byrne, R. (2017). KPI Key performance indicators in supply chain & logistics. Logistics Bureau, Oct 31. Retrieved from: https://www.logisticsbureau.com/kpi-key-performance-indicator/
Rollcart Transport System. (2018). Routenzug E-frame. Retrieved from https://rollcart. de/logistikoptimierung/e-frame-routenzug/
Sabattini, L., et al. (2018). The PAN-Robots Project: Advanced automated guided vehicle systems for industrial logistics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 25 (1), 55–64.
Schulze, L., & Wullner, A. (2006). The approach of automated guided vehicle systems. Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics (SOLI), 522–527.
Synáková, L. (2017). Production smoothing and cost performance in a production-inventory system. Journal of Competitiveness, 9 (1), 117–133.
Um, I., Cheon, H., & Lee, H. (2009). The simulation design and analysis of a flexible manufacturing system with automated guided vehicle system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 28 (4), 115–122.
Vis, I. (2006). Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 170 (3), 677–709.
Vosniakos, G.C., & Mamalis, A.G. (1990). Automated guided vehicle system design for FMS applications. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 30 (1), 85–97.
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (2), 195–219.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.