Reformed Gatekeeping
Abstract
This essay explores the state of gatekeeping theory at present. We discuss whether gatekeeping theory has a future, how gatekeeping – as it has evolved – still offers theoretical and explanatory value, and how gatekeeping must be reformed to maintain its worth and relevance. The notion is approached from its purpose, nature, temporality, agents and context. The article argues that gatekeeping theory will remain relevant pending a process of reform that must accompany that of journalism and news media.
References
Ambrose, M. L. & Ausloos, J. (2013). The Right to be Forgotten across the Pond. Journal of Information Policy, 3: 1–23.
Anderson, C. W. (2013). Towards a Sociology of Computational and Algorithmic Journalism. New Media & Society, 15(7) : 1005–1021.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Political Field, the Social Science Field, and the Journalistic Field. In R. Benson & E. Neveu (eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29–47). Malden, MA: Polity.
Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: P. Lang.
Bruns, A. (2011). Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism. Brazilian Journalism Research, 7(11): 117-135.
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K. & White, R. A. (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Clark, A. (2015). How an Investigative Journalist Helped Prove a City was Being Poisoned with Its Own Water. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/flint_water_lead_curt_guyette_aclu_michigan.php.
Curran, J. (2010). Technology Foretold. In N. Fenton (Ed.), New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age (pp. 19–34). London: Sage.
English, K. (2009). The Longtail of News: To Unpublish or Not to Unpublish. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/apme.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/online_journalism_credibility/a_suggested_script.pdf
Gieber, W. (1956). Across the Desk: A Study of 16 Telegraph Editors. Journalism Quarterly, 33: 423–432.
Harcup, T., & O'Neill, D. (2001). What is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2): 261–280.
Heinderyckx, F. (2015). Gatekeeping Theory Redux. In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 253–267). New York: Routledge.
Hiner, J. (2016). Letter to the Editor: Local Media didn't Whiff on Flint Coverage. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/2016/letter-to-the-editor-national-not-local-media-whiffed-on-flint-coverage/393583/.
Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional Models in Journalism: The Gatekeeper and the Advocate. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 52(4): 618–626.
Kaye, J. & Quinn, S. (2010). Funding Journalism in the Digital Age: Business Models, Strategies, Issues and Trends. New York: Peter Lang.
Le Cam, F. & Domingo, D. (2015). The Tyranny of Immediacy: Gatekeeping Practices in French and Spanish Online Newsrooms. In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 123–140). New York: Routledge.
Lehmann, H. (2010). The Dynamics of International Information Systems: Anatomy of a Grounded Theory Investigation. New York: Springer.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper.
Moore, M. (2016). 10 Things They Won't Tell You about the Flint Water Tragedy, but I Will. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/10-things-about-flint-water-tragedy_b_9132150.html?utm_hp_ref=media&ir=Media.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being Digital (1st ed.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Pearson, G. D. H. & Kosicki, G. M. (2016). How Way-finding is Challenging Gatekeeping in the Digital Age. Journalism Studies, 1–19. doi:0.1080/1461670X.2015.1123112
Phillips, A. (2015). Low-paid Piecework or Global Brands? In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 65–81). New York: Routledge.
Pool, I. D. S. & Shulman, I. (1959). Newsmen's Fantasies, Audiences, and Newswriting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 23: 145–158.
Powers, M. (2014). The Structural Organization of NGO Publicity Work: Explaining Divergent Publicity Strategies at Humanitarian and Human Rights Organizations. International Journal of Communication, 8(1): 90–107.
Reese, S. D. & Ballinger, J. (2001). The Roots of a Sociology of News: Remembering Mr. Gates and Social Control in the Newsroom. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4): 641–658.
Schudson, M. (2012). The Sociology of News (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Shoemaker, P. J. (1991). Gatekeeping. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Shoemaker, P. J. & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.
Shoemaker, P. J. Vos, T. P., & Reese, S. D. (2008). Journalists as Gatekeepers. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 73–87). New York: Routledge.
Starkman, D. (2014). The Watchdog that didn't Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Reporting. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stencel, M., Adair, B. & Kamalakanthan, P. (2014). The Goat must be Fed: Why Digital Tools are Missing in Most Newsrooms. Duke Reporter’s Lab. Retrieved from http://www.goatmustbefed.com/.
Sullivan, M. (2016). Should the Times have been a Tougher Watchdog in Flint? Retrieved from http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2016/01/27/flint-water-margaret-sullivan-new-york-times-public-editor/?_r=0.
Tandoc, E. C. (2014). Journalism is Twerking? How Web analytics is Changing the Process of Gatekeeping. New Media & Society, 16(4): 559–575.
Tandoc, E. C. (2015). Why Web Analytics Click: Factors Affecting the Ways Journalists Use Audience Metrics. Journalism Studies, 16(6): 782–799.
Tandoc, E. C. & Vos, T. P. (2015). The Journalist is Marketing the News: Social Media in the Gatekeeping Process. Journalism Practice, 1–17. doi:10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811
Thorson, K. & Wells, C. (2015). How Gatekeeping still Matters: Understanding Media Effects in an Era of Curated Flows. In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 25–44). New York: Routledge.
Vos, T. P. (2015). Revisiting Gatekeeping Theory in a Time of Transition. In T. P. Vos & F. Heinderyckx (eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.
Warren, J. (2016). How the Media Blew Flint. Retrieved from http://www.poynter.org/2016/how-the-media-blew-flint/392662/.
White, D. M. (1950). The 'Gate Geeper:' A Case Study in the Selection of News. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4): 383–390.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
Licensing
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in CM: Communication and Media and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Self-archiving policy
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the Editors and the Editorial Staff. The authors take legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the articles. Publisher shall have no liability in the event of issuance of any claims for damages. The Publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.