THE IMPACT OF MEDIA WORKERS' ATTITUDES ON THE ETHICS OF REPORTING ON MEDICALLY DIFFERENT PERSONS

  • Ognjen Radović Banja Luka College of Communications
Keywords: Bosnia and Herzegovina, stigma, disability, medically different persons, TV, journalism, media, ethics,

Abstract


The way media represents the Other is the result of combination of various factors that directly or indirectly affect media workers during the production of media content about the Other. An essential and decisive factor is the personal conviction of media worker (attitudes and prejudices). Given this fact and that the media reporting on the medically different persons (MDP) is stereotypical (frame of the victim, hero or burden), it was necessary to conduct a research with reporters and editors in relation to the current level of stigma towards MDP. The research was conducted in Republic of Srpska (B&H) among reporters and editors from four leading TV stations in RS (ELTA TV, ATV, BN TV and RTRS). Using a method of in-depth interview, 19 reporters and editors responded to questions concerning: (1) their views on MDP, (2) familiarity with the specifics of various health conditions, (3) their interactions with MDP, (4) self-evaluation of reporting on MDP, (5) self-regulation and (6) applying the existing codes of ethics when reporting on MDP. The results  indicate that media workers possess only basic knowledge about health differences and they primarily represent MDP on the basis of existing social stereotypes and media frames. Reporters and editors, even self-critical, tried to be socially correct, but had an ambivalent attitude and felt that self-regulation should not be used when reporting on MDP. In conclusion, it is clear that media workers use a combination of personal views on the ethics of reporting on MDP and rules of journalistic discourse, and not ethical principles and codes of reporting on the Other.

References

Cross, S. (1999). Mediating Madness: Mental Illness and Public Discourse in Current Affairs Television. Doktorska teza.

Dej, A. L. (2004). Etika u medijima - primeri i kontroverze. Beograd: Medija centar.

Frey, R. F. & Cissna, N. K. (2009). Routledge Handbook of Applied Communication Research. New York: Routledge.

Halilović, M. & Džihana, A. (2012). Medijsko pravo u Bosni i Hercegovini. Sarajevo: Sarajevo Internews u Bosni i Hercegovini.

Harper, S. (2009). Madness, Power and the Media Class, Gender and Race in Popular Representations of Mental Distress. New York: Palmgrave MacMillan.

Jaeger, T. P. & Bowman, A. C. (2005). Understanding Disability: Inclusion, Access, Diversity, and Civil Rights. London: Praeger.

Kušljugić, B. & Prohić, I. (2008). Socijalno isključeni u BiH danas, a sutra. Tuzla - Banja Luka: Biro za ljudska prava - Helsinški parlament građana Banja Luka.

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, M. K., Guest, G. & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector's Field Guide. Research Triangle Park: Family Health International.

Milošević, M. (2003). Novinarstvo i etika. Beograd: Media Centar.

Minoa, Ž. (2008). Istorija samoubistva. Novi Sad: Mediterran.

Murray, S. (2008). Representing Autism: Culture, Narrative, Fascination. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Nikolić, M. (2004). Etika radio talasa. Zbornik radova Fakulteta dramskih umetnosti, 8/9: 311-330.

Osteen, M. (2007). Autism and Representation. New York: Routledge.

Patterson, P. & Wilkins, L. (2014). Media Ethics – Issues and Cases (8th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Schiappa, E. (2008). Beyond Representational Correctness: Rethinking Criticism of Popular Media. New York: State University of New York Press.

SHIA (2012). Kodeks o načinu predstavljanja osoba s invaliditetom u medijima. Sarajevo: SHIA.

Snyder, L. S. & Mitchell, T. D. (1997). The Body and Pyhisical Difference: Discourses of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Snyder, L. S. & Mitchell, T. D. (2006). Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Terzić, Z. & Dragčo, I. (2011). O diskriminaciji – priručnik za novinarke i novinare. Sarajevo: Fondacija Mediacentar Sarajevo.

Vacić, Z. (2004). Etika javne reči u medijima i politici. Beograd: Centar za liberalno-demokratske studije.

Tasevska, D. (2012). The Role of the Media in Decreasing the Stigma at the People with Mental Illnesses. In Valić-Nedeljković, D. (ed.), Media Discourse of Poverty and Social Exclusion (pp. 171-180). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu.

Vučina, I., Musa, S., Dizdarević-Maksumić, A., Niškanović, J., Popović, T. & Lakić, B. (2012). Istraživanje stavova javnosti prema osobama sa mentalnim poremećajima (BiH). Sarajevo - Banjaluka: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC.

Williams, K. (2003). Understanding Media Theory. New York: Arnold Publishers.

Published
2017/12/17
Section
Original Scientific Paper