DISCOURSE ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN SERBIAN ONLINE MEDIA: DOMINANT COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES

  • Irina Milutinović Institute of European Studies
  • Jovica Pavlović Institut za evropske studije
Keywords: discourse, Violence Against Women, online media, Twitter, Serbia,

Abstract


This research aims to identify dominant communication strategies which are being used by the media to shape the topic of violence against women in Serbia. The media discourse on violence against women is the subject of this investigation, and it is located within: (1) media articles published in online editions of daily newspapers, (2) supplementary media text such as readers’ comments on online news-portals and (3) post and comments on the Twitter social network (tweets). The first part of the research systematizes the main characteristics of media reporting on violence against women in Serbia that was present within last five years, which is accompanied by a review of relevant literature. The second part of the article presents the empirical findings on the conducted research which is based on an adequate sample which covers the first two months of the year 2019. The research hypothesis - which states that there is a difference between the discourse concepts utilized by traditional and social media when it comes to the subject of violence against women, as social media content is created outside of the classical editorial bounds - was tested using the discourse analysis and content analysis methods. The research specifically concentrates on verbal violence, and in that sense the research exemplifies how the recent phenomenon of open social network communication, which promotes the freedom of speech, produces the kind of communication that correlates with the misogynistic discourse that is embedded within a particular society. The following communication strategies were identified: the promotion and legitimization of misogyny as a form of public discourse; astroturfing; condemnation of misogyny as a form of public discourse; Ad hominem, and the political instrumentalization of the topic of violence against women.

Author Biographies

Irina Milutinović, Institute of European Studies
Naučni saradnik
Jovica Pavlović, Institut za evropske studije
Istraživač pripravnik

References

Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words, London: Oxford University Press.

Coleman, R., McCombs, M., Shaw, D., & D. Weaver (2009). Agenda setting. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 147–160). New York: Routledge.

Dahlberg, L. (1988). Cyberspace and the Public Sphere: Exploring the Democratic Potential of the Net. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(2): 147–62.

Deacon, D., Murdock, G., Pickering, M., & Golding, P. (2010). Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Deibert, R., & Rohozinski, R. (2010). Liberation vs. Control in Cyberspace. Journal of Democracy, 21(4): 43–57.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Arnold.

Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res, 15(9), 1277–1288.

Kunczik, M. & Zipfel, A. (2006). Uvod u znanost o medijima i komunikologiju. Zagreb: Zaklada Friedrich Ebert.

Mršević, Z. (2015). Mediji u Srbiji 2014. o rodno zasnovanom nasilju: Između stereotipa i zabave. Beograd: Program UN za razvoj.

OSCE (2019). OSCE Survey on the Well-being and Safety of Women. Posećeno 12.3.2019. URL: https://www.osce.org/projects/survey-on-the-well-being-and-safety-of-women.

Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media and Society, 4(1): 9–27.

Pavlović, J. (2017). Digitalizacija javne sfere u Srbiji: Online pritisci izvršne vlasti na ombudsmana i reakcija opoziciono opredeljene Tviter zajednice. Političke perspektive, 7(3), 51–74.

Pearce, K., & Kendzior, S. (2010). Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 283–98.

Savet Evrope (2011). Konvencija o sprečavanju i borbi protiv nasilja prema ženama i nasilja u porodici, Istanbul, 11.5.2011. Posećeno 26.3.2019. URL: https://iskljucinasilje.rs/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Savet_evrope_konvencija_o_sprecavanju_i_borbi_protiv_nasilja_nad_zenama_i_nasilja_u_porodici_cir.pdf.

Searle, J. (1976). The Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23.

Serl, Dž. (1991). Govorni činovi. Ogledi iz filozofije jezika. Beograd: Nolit

Simić, I. (2014). Diskursi o porodičnom nasilju i narativi žena žrtava partnerskog nasilja, doktorska disertacija. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet

Stojšin, S. (2014): Kvalitativna i/ili kvantitativna analiza sadržaja – specifičnosti primene. Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta u NovomSadu, 39(1), 193–210.

Thu Nguyen, D., & Jon, A. (2001). Dolazak kiberprostor vremena i kraj političkog poretka. U R. Shields (еd.), Kulture Interneta (pp. 147–184). Zagreb: Naklada Jesenski i Turk / Hrvatsko sociološko društvo.

Van Dijk, T. (1988). News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 359–383.

Van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Power. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Višnjić, J. (2016). Rodna analiza teksta u online štampanim medijima u Srbiji, doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom Sadu – ACIMSI.

Walid, A.-S. (2019). Mecodify: A tool for big data analysis & visualization with Twitter as a case study. Posećeno 15.3.2019. URL: https://mecodify.org/mecodify-whitepaper.pdf.

Published
2019/12/16
Section
Original Scientific Paper