COMMUNICATION: ANALYTICAL UNIT OF TWO SELECTIONS AND TWO CONSTRUCTIONS

  • Boris Labudović Institut za usmeravanje komunikacija
Keywords: Luhmann, impactology, communication, function, definition, selection, construction,

Abstract


The paper is inspired by the discursive-analytical strategy and communicational aspects of Niklas Luhmann 's general theory of social systems as well as the conclusions of the Arizona State University Consortium for Strategic Communication. The CSC notes that communication based on the "message influence" model has become dysfunctional and therefore they propose a "pragmatic complexity modelwhich is primarily drawn from the perspective of new systems presented by Niklas Luhmann. It is no longer a question of "how to construct a more influential message", but "what kind of reality has a particular system that we want to influence constructed for itself." For these reasons, from the broad field of communication science I differentiate the segment related to the study of strategic models for managing public communications with individuals, groups and communities (propaganda, public relations, political marketing). I suggest a distinctive name for this area - Impactology. I then elaborate on the understanding and definition of communication as a symbolic coordination of sense, which, analytically stratified, consists of two selections and two constructions. The alter selects the data and constructs the utterance, and the ego selects the utterance and constructs the understanding (by selecting meaning, contextual interpretation and attributing sense). Thus viewed, every communicational event (commevent) is bidirectional and presents a particular negotiation of sense in which both parties equally participate. This dismisses Berl's SMCR model inspired by Shannon and Weaver as inadequate in the hypercomplex and multi-contextual contemporary world.

References

Andersen, N. A. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology. New York: Chandler.

Corman, S. R., Trethewey, A., & Goodall, B. (2007). A 21st century model for communication in the global war of ideas: From simplistic influence to pragmatic complexity. Phoenix, AZ: Arisona State University.

Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.

Dance, F. E. X. (1970). The “concept” of communication. Journal of Communication, 20(2), 201–210.

Fuchs, P. (2002). The time of communication. Das gepfefferte Ferkel.

Gleick, J. (2011). The information : A history, a theory, a flood [Kindle Edition]. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Labudović, B. (2007a). Pojam komunikacije u opštoj teoriji društvenih sistema Niklasa Lumana. CM: Časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem, 2(2), 23–44.

Labudović, B. (2007b). Niklas Luman kao komunikolog: masmediji i javnost u opštoj teoriji društvenih sistema. CM: Časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem, 2(4), 89–110.

Labudović, B. (2016). Odnosi s javnošću kao usmeravanje komunikacija sa grupama i zajednicama. Doktorska disertacija. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.

Luhmann, N. (1992). Autopoiesis: What is Communication? Communication Theory, 2(3), 251–259.

Luhmann, N. (2000). Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Luman, N. (2001). Društveni sistemi: Osnovi opšte teorije. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.

Radojković, M. (2014). Komunikacija. U Pijanović, P. (ur.), Leksikon obrazovnih termina. Beograd: Učiteljski fakultet.

Radojković, M., & Đorđević, T. (2001). Osnove komunikologije. Beograd: Čigoja.

Schiltz, M. (2007). Space is the Place: The Laws of Form and Social Systems. Thesis Eleven, 88(1), 8–30.

Sciulli, D. (1994). An Interview with Niklas Luhmann. Theory Culture Society, 11(2), 37–68.

Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Spencer Brown, G. (1977). Laws of form. New York: Julian Press.

Thyssen, O. (2005). The Invisibility of the Organization. Ephemera, 5(3), 519–536.

Published
2019/12/16
Section
Review Paper