Freedom of expression or violation of the honor and reputation?
Abstract
In the nature of human beings there is a need for mutual exchange of information, ideas, opinions, knowledge. Telling in a simple language, this is the need for communication. It is not an exaggeration to attribute a much stronger function to communication in modern society. It is the basis for connecting individuals, groups and even social communities. Communication is, in addition, a necessary means of civilizational achievements (as an exchange of knowledge and ideas), but also of social and political changes. Although communication is not a process inherent only in modern society, there is no doubt that its explosive significance in the 21st century is directly related to the emergence of the Internet and, in particular, the various Internet platforms through which it takes place in a fast and cheap way. More importantly, information exchanged over the Internet can be learned by an audience of millions at the same time. Of particular importance in this process of expansion of Internet communication certainly belongs to numerous social networks. Among them, the most popular are certainly Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok. Today, there is almost no Internet user who is not at the same time a user of some of the planet's popular social networks.
Apart from the advantages of communication in the digital environment and the fact that the Internet has made everyday life much more comfortable, the new era in communication has reopened the question of where the line is between freedom of expression and violation of rights, but also who is responsible for the violation. Although at first glance it may seem that legal science has long given an answer to the questions posed, this paper aims to, by analyzing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and domestic courts, point out that insufficiently developed legal framework for communication via the Internet can jeopardize the seemingly solid acquis, especially when it comes to the basic rights of man and citizen. We pay special attention to the right to the dignity of the person, i.e. honor and reputation. After analyzing the case law, we will set out the criteria for the delimitation of freedom of expression and the violation of the right to dignity, which provide the necessary legal certainty, especially in times of dominant communication via the Internet.
References
Zakon o obligacionim odnosima, Sl. list SFRJ", br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 - odluka USJ i 57/89, "Sl. list SRJ", br. 31/93, "Sl. list SCG", br. 1/2003 - Ustavna povelja i "Sl. glasnik RS", br. 18/2020,
Zakon o javnom informisanju i medijima, Sl. glasnik RS", br. 83/2014, 58/2015 i 12/2016 - autentično tumačenje
Ivan Klajn – Milan Šipka, Veliki rečnik stranih reči i izraza, treće dopunjeno i ispravljeno izdanje, Novi Sad: Prometej, 2008
Zakon o parničnom postupku, Sl. glasnik RS", br. 72/2011, 49/2013 - odluka US, 74/2013 - odluka US, 55/2014, 87/2018 i 18/2020
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of Lingens vs Austria (Application no. 9815/82), Strasbourg, 8 July 1986
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of Castells v. Spain (Application no. 11798/85), Strasbourg, 23 April 1992
European Court of Human Rights, judgement incase of Sürek vs Turkey, (Application no. 24735/94), Strasbourg, 8 july, 1999
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of Lopes Gomes Da Silva v. Portugal (Application no. 37698/97), Strasbourg, 28 September 2000
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of Pedersen nad Baadsgaard vs Denmark (Application no. 49017/99), Strasbourg, 17 December 2004
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium (7/1996/626/809), Strasbourg, 24 February 1997
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of Tammer vs Estonia (Application no. 41205/98), Strasbourg, 06 February
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of Andreas Wabl vs Austria (Application no. 24773/94), Strasbourg, 21 March 2000
Zakon o ratifikaciji Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, izmenjene u skladu sa Protokolom broj 11, Protokolom uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Protokolom broj 4 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda kojim se obezbeđuju izvesna prava i slobode koji nisu uključeni u Konvenciju i prvi protocol uz nju, Protokolom broj 6 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda o ukidanju smrtne kazne, Protokolom broj 7 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Protokolom broj 12 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda i Protokolom broj 13 uz Konvenciju za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda o ukidanju smrtne kazne u svim okolnostima, Sl. list SCG - Međunarodni ugovori", br. 9/2003, 5/2005 i 7/2005 - ispr. i "Sl. glasnik RS - Međunarodni ugovori", br. 12/2010 i 10/2015
European Court of Human Rights, judgement in case of White vs Sweden (Application no. 42435/02), Strasbourg, 19 september 2006
Odluka Ustavnog suda, br. Už – 7387/2015, objavljena u “Službenom glasniku RS”, br. 19/2018 od 14. marta 2018. godine, iz pravne baze Paragraflex.
Mitrović, M., “Sloboda izražavanja i zaštita podataka o ličnosti na internetu: Perspektiva internet korisnika u Srbiji”, Komunikacija i mediji, br. 47/2020, 5-34.
Matović, M., Zunić Pavlović V., “Povezanost restriktivnih strategija roditeljskog nadzora i digitalnog nasilja u adolescenciji”, Komunikacija i mediji, br. 47/2020, 35-56;
Silajdžić L, Dudić A, “Mladi i ovisnost o informacijsko-komunikacijskim tehnologijama: internet, društvene mreže i mobilni telefoni”, Komunikacija i mediji, br. 47/2020, 57-84;
Obradović N, “Uticaj upotrebe društvenih mreža na političko informisanje i političko znanje studenata u Srbiji”, Komunikacija i mediji, br. 48/2020, 3-36.
Nikolić D., Uvod u sistem građanskog prava, Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Novi Sad 2010,
Orlović S., Ustavno pravo, Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu, Novi Sad 2019,
Krivični zakonik, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 85/2005, 88/2005 - ispr., 107/2005 - ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016 i 35/2019, čl. 170, st. 4.
Zakon o elektronskim medijima, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 83/2014 i 6/2016.
Zakon o elektronskoj trgovini, Službeni glasnik RS, 41/2009, 95/2013, 52/2019. Universal declaration of human rights, https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/udhr.pdf, 01. oktobar 2021.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
Licensing
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in CM: Communication and Media and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Self-archiving policy
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the Editors and the Editorial Staff. The authors take legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the articles. Publisher shall have no liability in the event of issuance of any claims for damages. The Publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.